Shula was 138-39-5 all 14 game seasons a winning percentage of 78 % with 2 Super Bowl wins in 4 attempts.
Tomlin is at 133-74-1 with a winning percentage of 64 percent huge advantage Shula He has 5 less wins and 35 more losses in 26 less games and has NEVER had a season with even just 2 losses. He also has not been to the Super Bow in 10 years and counting.
Your math is off:
Shula: 138+39+5 = 182 games
Tomlin: 133+74+1 = 206
Shula, not Tomlin had fewer games under your criteria. Also interesting to note that Shula had a HOF QB from '83 to '95 and got one trip to the SB during that time period ('84). After the '84 season, Shula's post season record was pretty pedestrian (when they made it to the post season). Now, to be fair, he made it more often with an in his prime Marino than Tomlin has with Ben over the last few seasons. So, there's that. But, let's not act as if what he failed to accomplish having Marino for 13 years wasn't a disappointment (at least for Dolphins fans. I could care less because Shula never coached the Steelers).
Last edited: