• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

With the 102nd overall pick, the Pittsburgh Steelers select OLB Alex Highsmith

Yea, all of the lower level college linebacker picks we've wasted by drafting them.

Kent State disagrees...
 
Yea, all of the lower level college linebacker picks we've wasted by drafting them.

Kent State disagrees...

I guess you're going way back to 1974 and Jack Lambert, because James Harrison was undrafted. Lambert was a second round talent, 46th overall, and really of no relevance to any of this, but thanks for the input.
 
My original point, which I clearly established way back on page 3 is:

'Tweener DE sack specialists from lower level college competition are a dime-a-dozen. In fact, the Steelers drafted one in the sixth round last year (Sutton Smith), and waived him in August.


It's a big thread, thanks for bringing this back up. Sutton Smith is a pretty bad comparison though.

The third round (and the team's second overall pick) is a bit early for a project player, in my opinion. The kid himself said there was only one other team interested enough in him to arrange a meeting with both the head coach and the GM. I would have taken my chances he would have been there at #135, or almost certainly #124.

Hard to ignore the first-round pick. The Steelers didn't package it to move up or something, they got an All-Pro player in his second year for it. A third-rounder selection is a third-round selection. Completely irrelevant which number in the draft it is for you. But I agree he very well could've been there for either fourth-round pick. Who are you taking instead?
 
Again, never said they were exactly the same. The concern with Highsmith is his strength. He's most likely too slow to play linebacker, and too weak to rush the passer in the NFL. That's why he's in the 'tweener category (and he clearly is not a first or second round talent like those comparisons above), so I would've preferred to have seen him taken in a later round, especially in this short-handed draft. Nothing silly about it.
.1 speed differential with Watt. One ran a 4.69 the other a 4.7. His speed or strength really isn't a concern IMO. Level of competition is to a certain degree. But that doesn't mean he would have been available later as pass rushers are in high demand. Small school prospects are always carrying concerns but that third round comp pick is alarmingly close to a 4th round pick. His production and get off was enough for me to warrant a look for where he was picked.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
Well, either the kid succeeds, justifying the pick; or he doesn't, justifying your disdain. We'll find out which over the course of his rookie contract.
As for the 20 bench reps, I'm sure that you remember saying that doing only 20 reps meant the kid was weak. I posted the other players' reps not to say he was as good as them (although again, time will tell that story), but rather to show that some draftees who were from big time programs and considered NFL talent posted a similar bench. Others posted Watt and Miller's to show that 20 reps doesn't make a player weak and/or ineffective. Nobody, I mean nobody, said the kid was the next coming of Watt or Miller; just that those guys succeeded at the NFL level after posting bench press reps that you qualified as belonging to someone who is weak. In any event, since the kid hasn't played one single down of NFL football, I'll reserve judgment on him until he actually has the chance to show what he is and/or can become.
 
My original point, which I clearly established way back on page 3 is:

'Tweener DE sack specialists from lower level college competition are a dime-a-dozen. In fact, the Steelers drafted one in the sixth round last year (Sutton Smith), and waived him in August.

There's no reason to waste the second pick of an already abbreviated draft on a player like this.


The third round (and the team's second overall pick) is a bit early for a project player, in my opinion. The kid himself said there was only one other team interested enough in him to arrange a meeting with both the head coach and the GM. I would have taken my chances he would have been there at #135, or almost certainly #124. Hopefully it works out, but unlike others, the Clemson tape doesn't do it for me.

My point in that particular quoted reply is:

Comparing the guy to Miller, Mack, Watt, and others simply because they have similar bench press reps is a stupid argument.
So just asking for clarification is he still weak or no?
 
So just asking for clarification is he still weak or no?

Won’t disagree with what you got here, however this guy they grabbed a little early, is now in a three battle with what we have as back ups he is good enough to shore up the slot, allowing us to move on... hole filled. Gives Skipper and the other a fire to want to get better. Only one will emerge, it was something they had to address, maybe the feel 15 pounds of leg muscle in 9 months can make him a beast. You can’t win by picking the obvious choice every time. Realize who he really replacing its not Dud Dupree it’s his back up who is no longer on the team. I might of quoted the wrong guy Tequila!!
 
So you want to compare him to TJ Watt (let's simply ignore the fact that Watt is superior in every single category you listed there except a tie in arm length, including four inches in vertical and more than a full half second better in the 3-cone, which is a huge disparity -- thanks for proving my earlier point) based on bench reps, but yet you admit that he needs to develop more strength?

I was comparing their size/measurables, which minus the 3-cone drill time, aren't all that different. If you're going to freak out that the one jumped 4 inches higher than the other, go right ahead. But my point still stands that their size/measurables aren't all that different. I know he's not TJ Watt. I was simply refuting an argument you were making about him being the next Sutton Smith.

Maybe Highsmith will magically turn into TJ Watt in three or four years, and you can stroke him off the next time you visit Latrobe in July.

Go **** yourself you pompous little know-it-all. Don't ever act like you're above making grade school insults because somebody is having a disagreement with you.
 
Notice how the haters immediately jump to hyperbole and put words in our mouths as though anyone who sees promise in Highsmith likens him to the next coming of TJ Watt??? LOL!
 
I guess you're going way back to 1974 and Jack Lambert, because James Harrison was undrafted. Lambert was a second round talent, 46th overall, and really of no relevance to any of this, but thanks for the input.

Anytime, and Harrison is even more relevant since he was undrafted and became a small school starter at LB.
 
It's a big thread, thanks for bringing this back up. Sutton Smith is a pretty bad comparison though.

You're welcome.

I already explained the Sutton Smith comparison, though:

Again, never said they were exactly the same. The concern with Highsmith is his strength. He's most likely too slow to play linebacker, and too weak to rush the passer in the NFL. That's why he's in the 'tweener category (and he clearly is not a first or second round talent like those comparisons above), so I would've preferred to have seen him taken in a later round, especially in this short-handed draft. Nothing silly about it.

SteelerFan448 said:
Hard to ignore the first-round pick. The Steelers didn't package it to move up or something, they got an All-Pro player in his second year for it. A third-rounder selection is a third-round selection. Completely irrelevant which number in the draft it is for you. But I agree he very well could've been there for either fourth-round pick. Who are you taking instead?

Well, I'm not questioning Minkah here, so I'm not sure why you're bringing that up.

Honestly, I was hoping they'd take Jacob Eason with the pick, because I'm not confident in either of the backup quarterbacks. He's got all the physical tools to be a starting NFL quarterback, and is the perfect candidate to learn the ropes behind Ben for his last year or two. Also liked Troy Pride (good fit for their secondary) and Tyler Biadasz (and yes, I know he dropped to #146, but I still think he's NFL ready despite some injury concerns).
 
.1 speed differential with Watt. One ran a 4.69 the other a 4.7. His speed or strength really isn't a concern IMO. Level of competition is to a certain degree. But that doesn't mean he would have been available later as pass rushers are in high demand. Small school prospects are always carrying concerns but that third round comp pick is alarmingly close to a 4th round pick. His production and get off was enough for me to warrant a look for where he was picked.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Steeler Nation mobile app

One year of production at Charlotte after having 6 sacks in his first 3 seasons isn't enough for me, but I hope you're right.
 
Well, either the kid succeeds, justifying the pick; or he doesn't, justifying your disdain. We'll find out which over the course of his rookie contract.
As for the 20 bench reps, I'm sure that you remember saying that doing only 20 reps meant the kid was weak. I posted the other players' reps not to say he was as good as them (although again, time will tell that story), but rather to show that some draftees who were from big time programs and considered NFL talent posted a similar bench. Others posted Watt and Miller's to show that 20 reps doesn't make a player weak and/or ineffective. Nobody, I mean nobody, said the kid was the next coming of Watt or Miller; just that those guys succeeded at the NFL level after posting bench press reps that you qualified as belonging to someone who is weak. In any event, since the kid hasn't played one single down of NFL football, I'll reserve judgment on him until he actually has the chance to show what he is and/or can become.

I believe what I said was that 20 bench reps is below average, which it is.

I'm pretty certain that regardless of what his bench press is, most every scouting report you can find on the guy notes that he will need to add strength, which he does.

I'm quite certain that you and others tried to cherry pick bench press numbers of successful NFL players to try and prove a straw man argument, from which you're now trying to backpedal.
 
I believe what I said was that 20 bench reps is below average, which it is.

I'm pretty certain that regardless of what his bench press is, most every scouting report you can find on the guy notes that he will need to add strength, which he does.

I'm quite certain that you and others tried to cherry pick bench press numbers of successful NFL players to try and prove a straw man argument, from which you're now trying to backpedal.

Sooooo, you evidently think 20 reps is impressive? For a guy who'll be taking on skilled 320 pound NFL lineman on a regular basis?

You're absolutely right. There's no possible way to conclude from your prior statement that you were implying the kid is too weak to take on NFL linemen on a regular basis. None at all. *Sigh*
 
I was comparing their size/measurables, which minus the 3-cone drill time, aren't all that different. If you're going to freak out that the one jumped 4 inches higher than the other, go right ahead. But my point still stands that their size/measurables aren't all that different. I know he's not TJ Watt. I was simply refuting an argument you were making about him being the next Sutton Smith.

Yeah, minus the huge differences in 3-cone and vertical, they're like clones. Right on. You're so full of ****.


Steelworth said:
Go **** yourself you pompous little know-it-all. Don't ever act like you're above making grade school insults because somebody is having a disagreement with you.

Oh, I see...you can tell me to "get the **** outta here," but I can't have a little fun at your expense after that? Don't ever act like you're not a whiny little hypocrite.
 
You're absolutely right. There's no possible way to conclude from your prior statement that you were implying the kid is too weak to take on NFL linemen on a regular basis. None at all. *Sigh*

I did say he was weak, just like every other scouting report. Do you believe he can take on NFL lineman right now, or does he need to add strength?

Can't you read?
 
Notice how the haters immediately jump to hyperbole and put words in our mouths as though anyone who sees promise in Highsmith likens him to the next coming of TJ Watt??? LOL!

Well, I'm not the guy who posted anonymous combine numbers (even though several weren't even close), and followed it up with this comment:

"#1 is Pro-Bowler and beast TJ Watt. #2 is Alex Highsmith."


Yeah, nothing hyperbolic about that there. Great point.
 
Yeah, minus the huge differences in 3-cone and vertical, they're like clones. Right on. You're so full of ****.

*sigh*
 
Anytime, and Harrison is even more relevant since he was undrafted and became a small school starter at LB.

This is what you said:

"Yea, all of the lower level college linebacker picks we've wasted by drafting them."

Except by defintion, it's impossible for the Steelers to have wasted a draft pick on an undrafted player. C'mon, bro, you're making this too easy.
 
*Yawn* .... This guy is boring. Talks in more circles than a politician at a revival.

I never get bored with kicking your sorry *** in at least one argument per year. It's fun.
 
I never get bored with kicking your sorry *** in at least one argument per year. It's fun.

If you say so slick. Everyone is entitled to their own delusions. On a good note (for you), your delusion means you can continue fellating yourself for the rest of the night.
 
I never get bored with kicking your sorry *** in at least one argument per year. It's fun.

You're ******* delusional kid, but if you think coming on at night talking like a smartass know-it-all douchebag, prepare for some blowback.
 
Top