Yea, all of the lower level college linebacker picks we've wasted by drafting them.
Kent State disagrees...
Kent State disagrees...
Yea, all of the lower level college linebacker picks we've wasted by drafting them.
Kent State disagrees...
My original point, which I clearly established way back on page 3 is:
'Tweener DE sack specialists from lower level college competition are a dime-a-dozen. In fact, the Steelers drafted one in the sixth round last year (Sutton Smith), and waived him in August.
The third round (and the team's second overall pick) is a bit early for a project player, in my opinion. The kid himself said there was only one other team interested enough in him to arrange a meeting with both the head coach and the GM. I would have taken my chances he would have been there at #135, or almost certainly #124.
.1 speed differential with Watt. One ran a 4.69 the other a 4.7. His speed or strength really isn't a concern IMO. Level of competition is to a certain degree. But that doesn't mean he would have been available later as pass rushers are in high demand. Small school prospects are always carrying concerns but that third round comp pick is alarmingly close to a 4th round pick. His production and get off was enough for me to warrant a look for where he was picked.Again, never said they were exactly the same. The concern with Highsmith is his strength. He's most likely too slow to play linebacker, and too weak to rush the passer in the NFL. That's why he's in the 'tweener category (and he clearly is not a first or second round talent like those comparisons above), so I would've preferred to have seen him taken in a later round, especially in this short-handed draft. Nothing silly about it.
So just asking for clarification is he still weak or no?My original point, which I clearly established way back on page 3 is:
'Tweener DE sack specialists from lower level college competition are a dime-a-dozen. In fact, the Steelers drafted one in the sixth round last year (Sutton Smith), and waived him in August.
There's no reason to waste the second pick of an already abbreviated draft on a player like this.
The third round (and the team's second overall pick) is a bit early for a project player, in my opinion. The kid himself said there was only one other team interested enough in him to arrange a meeting with both the head coach and the GM. I would have taken my chances he would have been there at #135, or almost certainly #124. Hopefully it works out, but unlike others, the Clemson tape doesn't do it for me.
My point in that particular quoted reply is:
Comparing the guy to Miller, Mack, Watt, and others simply because they have similar bench press reps is a stupid argument.
So just asking for clarification is he still weak or no?
So you want to compare him to TJ Watt (let's simply ignore the fact that Watt is superior in every single category you listed there except a tie in arm length, including four inches in vertical and more than a full half second better in the 3-cone, which is a huge disparity -- thanks for proving my earlier point) based on bench reps, but yet you admit that he needs to develop more strength?
Maybe Highsmith will magically turn into TJ Watt in three or four years, and you can stroke him off the next time you visit Latrobe in July.
I guess you're going way back to 1974 and Jack Lambert, because James Harrison was undrafted. Lambert was a second round talent, 46th overall, and really of no relevance to any of this, but thanks for the input.
It's a big thread, thanks for bringing this back up. Sutton Smith is a pretty bad comparison though.
SteelerFan448 said:Hard to ignore the first-round pick. The Steelers didn't package it to move up or something, they got an All-Pro player in his second year for it. A third-rounder selection is a third-round selection. Completely irrelevant which number in the draft it is for you. But I agree he very well could've been there for either fourth-round pick. Who are you taking instead?
.1 speed differential with Watt. One ran a 4.69 the other a 4.7. His speed or strength really isn't a concern IMO. Level of competition is to a certain degree. But that doesn't mean he would have been available later as pass rushers are in high demand. Small school prospects are always carrying concerns but that third round comp pick is alarmingly close to a 4th round pick. His production and get off was enough for me to warrant a look for where he was picked.
Sent from my moto g(7) power using Steeler Nation mobile app
Well, either the kid succeeds, justifying the pick; or he doesn't, justifying your disdain. We'll find out which over the course of his rookie contract.
As for the 20 bench reps, I'm sure that you remember saying that doing only 20 reps meant the kid was weak. I posted the other players' reps not to say he was as good as them (although again, time will tell that story), but rather to show that some draftees who were from big time programs and considered NFL talent posted a similar bench. Others posted Watt and Miller's to show that 20 reps doesn't make a player weak and/or ineffective. Nobody, I mean nobody, said the kid was the next coming of Watt or Miller; just that those guys succeeded at the NFL level after posting bench press reps that you qualified as belonging to someone who is weak. In any event, since the kid hasn't played one single down of NFL football, I'll reserve judgment on him until he actually has the chance to show what he is and/or can become.
So just asking for clarification is he still weak or no?
I believe what I said was that 20 bench reps is below average, which it is.
I'm pretty certain that regardless of what his bench press is, most every scouting report you can find on the guy notes that he will need to add strength, which he does.
I'm quite certain that you and others tried to cherry pick bench press numbers of successful NFL players to try and prove a straw man argument, from which you're now trying to backpedal.
Sooooo, you evidently think 20 reps is impressive? For a guy who'll be taking on skilled 320 pound NFL lineman on a regular basis?
I was comparing their size/measurables, which minus the 3-cone drill time, aren't all that different. If you're going to freak out that the one jumped 4 inches higher than the other, go right ahead. But my point still stands that their size/measurables aren't all that different. I know he's not TJ Watt. I was simply refuting an argument you were making about him being the next Sutton Smith.
Steelworth said:Go **** yourself you pompous little know-it-all. Don't ever act like you're above making grade school insults because somebody is having a disagreement with you.
You're absolutely right. There's no possible way to conclude from your prior statement that you were implying the kid is too weak to take on NFL linemen on a regular basis. None at all. *Sigh*
Notice how the haters immediately jump to hyperbole and put words in our mouths as though anyone who sees promise in Highsmith likens him to the next coming of TJ Watt??? LOL!
Yeah, minus the huge differences in 3-cone and vertical, they're like clones. Right on. You're so full of ****.
Anytime, and Harrison is even more relevant since he was undrafted and became a small school starter at LB.
*sigh*
*Yawn* .... This guy is boring. Talks in more circles than a politician at a revival.
I never get bored with kicking your sorry *** in at least one argument per year. It's fun.
I never get bored with kicking your sorry *** in at least one argument per year. It's fun.