I don't know why I have to do all the work. I'm not the one getting paid $7M a year.
But since you asked, I've given this opinion a few times now regarding yesterday. My thought from yesterday is that the offensive coaching had a terrible game plan that played right into the strength of the defense and simultaneously prevented the QB from knocking the rust off after missing time. I felt yesterday they should have come out with an array of high percentage passing plays on early downs to get Ben into a rhythm and give him confidence. The Ravens strength is their run D anyway. Even if Ben were healthy, we should have approached this game with a pass-first mentality to help open things up for Le'Veon. With Ben needing to knock the rust off, we DEFINITELY needed to do that. The offensive game plan was a complete failure.
So if I'm the guy making $7M a year, I look at our poor play on the road, and I look at the fact that, admittedly, the coaching is "the same" for both home and road games, I'm asking "what can I do differently for road games as opposed to home games?" My answer is a greater focus on getting our QB confidence EARLY in the game, and a greater focus on game-planning the opponent. I believe that this coaching staff is very stubborn, and at times arrogant, and forces what THEY want to do believing that they can impose their will on the opponent. At home, this tends to work. Our offense is a well-oiled machine at home and we are often able to move up and down the field with ease playing OUR game doing what we came in wanting to do. But maybe, if you're going to switch up your philosophy on the road, you take less focus off what YOU want to come in and do, how YOU think YOU will impose your will, and focus instead on to a more nuanced and detailed analysis of what the opponent is likely to give you. For instance, the Ravens have the 2nd best rush D in the league yet we ran Bell straight into the teeth of the defense OVER AND OVER. Meanwhile, against the Dolphins who have the 4th WORST run D in the league, Ben threw 34 passes and Le'Veon had 10 carries. And the game was pretty close throughout the entire first half and even thru some of the 3rd. We were not forced to throw. But Le'Veon was barely involved. Why? Do we have no awareness of the opponents weaknesses? Remember when Belichick used to dink and dunk us and not even attempt a run for an entire game because he knew spreading us out was how to beat us? If you observe that you don't impose your will on the road the way you do at home, then you learn what that opponent is likely to give you and you kill them thru 1,000 cuts of whatever is their weak point. And if that doesn't work, be prepared to adjust what you are doing instead of stubbornly continuing to pound your head against the wall doing what isn't working.
I believe I have satisfactorily answered your question. Now if you would please humor me and do the same, what would need to happen on the field for you to blame Tomlin for something? We all know bad challenges, bad clock management, or a bad 4th down decision is on the head coach, so I'm hoping you don't take that low-hanging fruit.