• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Dri 2.0

Dri Archer will be a 500yd + 4 TD player this year (rushing + receiving).

If it happens then I will say I told you so. If it does not happen then I shall not speak of it again and pretend I never said it.

if that happens someone should buy you a beer (it won't be me cause I live too far away)
 
I apologize ... I thought I was having a discussion with someone who could actually pay attention to the flow of the conversation and understand what was being said. The last few posts and responses between us have made me reassess.

Haley was brought into the discussion because I don't believe the pick is made without his input and evaluation. That's why.

So you didn't mean to blame him for the draft pick but you wanted to make it known that he has input... ok

My point, and perhaps the sarcasm was lost, is that some on this board immediately play the "Tomlin card" whenever anything goes wrong or doesn't work out with this team. Hence "Tomlin is da debil".

This was the point I talked about first. So you admit Tomlin is responsible but Haley had a hand in it to.. maybe... because you have no evidence at all that Haley wanted Archer or any other RB at all. Got it. Crystal clear.
 
I know right? Cowher didn't mention them either when he said it was a "collaborative effort" a "consensus" type of thing and not a one person has "final say" type of thing.

http://www.Invalid Link - Check SN Home Page/2014/05/final-say-draft-picks-process-collaboration-steelers-says-bill-cowher/

Which is exactly why Donahoe wasn't allowed to leave. He didn't draft Troy Edwards.. oh wait.... The entire power struggle between Cowher and Donahoe was draft related. Even in that "clipped" interview he says "Cowher did say that if the head coach doesn't want a specific player then the team isn't going to draft him". Sounds like the HC has a lot of say doesn't it?

Again nobody is saying there isn't input. I also noticed Bill said nothing about coordinators. He mentioned the FO and scouts.

BTW this article was written specifically to take blame away from Tomlin. That's what the Pittsburgh press does these days. They are lap dogs. They wanted to make sure people knew that Tomlin wasn't really to blame because others had "input"..... sound familiar?
 
Or it was Haley's pick, seeing as how he has liked to employ similar sized players in his offense in the past. Maybe it was Colbert's pick. Possibly they all agreed on the pick. But hey, blaming EVERYTHING on Tomlin makes a better narrative right? Dude has made a lot of mistakes, for sure, but not EVERYTHING is his fault. "Tomblin is da debil" lol

I'm sure you didn't miss that part in my earlier statement. That would imply that Haley had some input in the decision.

So you didn't mean to blame him for the draft pick but you wanted to make it known that he has input... ok

This was the point I talked about first. So you admit Tomlin is responsible but Haley had a hand in it to.. maybe... because you have no evidence at all that Haley wanted Archer or any other RB at all. Got it. Crystal clear.

He deserves blame proportional to his input. So does the scouting department. There's enough blame to go around. Final "responsibility" for the pick? That's Colbert and Tomlin. I know, the idea that everyone who has input on a bad decision deserves blame, but the responsibility for making that decision falls on the leaders is a hard concept to perceive isn't it. As for evidence that Haley wanted Archer ... Google it.
 
Last edited:
Which is exactly why Donahoe wasn't allowed to leave. He didn't draft Troy Edwards.. oh wait.... The entire power struggle between Cowher and Donahoe was draft related. Even in that "clipped" interview he says "Cowher did say that if the head coach doesn't want a specific player then the team isn't going to draft him". Sounds like the HC has a lot of say doesn't it?

Again nobody is saying there isn't input. I also noticed Bill said nothing about coordinators. He mentioned the FO and scouts.

BTW this article was written specifically to take blame away from Tomlin. That's what the Pittsburgh press does these days. They are lap dogs. They wanted to make sure people knew that Tomlin wasn't really to blame because others had "input"..... sound familiar?

Thanks for your opinion and input. I've considered it.
 
I'm sure you didn't miss that part in my earlier statement. That would imply that Haley had some input in the decision.

He deserves blame proportional to his input. So does the scouting department. There's enough blame to go around. Final "responsibility" for the pick? That's Colbert and Tomlin. I know, the idea that everyone who has input on a bad decision deserves blame, but the responsibility for making that decision falls on the leaders is a hard concept to perceive isn't it. As for evidence that Haley wanted Archer ... Google it.

But you've put no proportions on any of it. What is Haley's share? I also don't need to google Haley talking about Archer after the fact. Of course he is going to be on board. Show me one before the draft. If Archer was Haley's pick then why didn't he get more playing time? Why would Haley bench his own guy with very little playing time to evaluate him?

I understand that you think Tombert is ultimately responsible. However you throw out often that Haley is partially responsible because of a guy he had for 1 year in KC. Again there is no evidence for this at all... anywhere.
 
So let me get this right... Haley (a guy just fired from KC) comes in and has enough pull to change the way Tombert drafts? But when I suggested that the HC, Tomlin came in and changed the way defense was drafted I was told he didn't have that much power early on? Can you explain why in the hell DL would want to change from powerful run stopping LBs that can rush the passer to a lighter softer LB?

Truly amazing indeed. The proof is in the pudding. You are assuming that Haley likes small fast RBs. You have no idea who controlled the draft in KC. You don't even know if he liked McCluster. But somehow in all your knowledge and wisdom you pin all these small RBs on him as an OC? Talk about words being right there for you to read... Do you have any quotes or proof?

I have never said that many people don't have input. That's a typical strawman. I never said that coordinators have NO input. But to make up things just because you believe them to be true doesn't make it true. You have no evidence at all that Haley wants small fast RBs... NONE.

I would think that Dick MIGHT want lighter faster guys due to qb's like Manning and Brady *** raping his ******* defense every damn time they hit the field. That's just a guess, maybe St LeBeau liked Tommy ******* him every time they played, but I doubt it. Turns out big slow run stopping lb's can't do **** when you run a TE over the middle, especially when the ******* prick running the NFL says you're no longer allowed to knock them the **** out for doing it.

Joe
 
But you've put no proportions on any of it. What is Haley's share? I also don't need to google Haley talking about Archer after the fact. Of course he is going to be on board. Show me one before the draft. If Archer was Haley's pick then why didn't he get more playing time? Why would Haley bench his own guy with very little playing time to evaluate him?

I understand that you think Tombert is ultimately responsible. However you throw out often that Haley is partially responsible because of a guy he had for 1 year in KC. Again there is no evidence for this at all... anywhere.

You do realize that one key part of the draft is to NOT show other teams you are interested in particular players right?

Besides the fact that you are insinuating (again) that I'm saying Archer was solely Haley's pick, Archer was benched because he SUCKED last year.

I said Haley was partially to blame for the pick .... and Tomlin and Colbert have to face the ultimate responsibility. Two different things. I can partially blame you for this discussion deteriorating to where we are essentially repeating the same things over and over ... However, I bear ultimate responsibility for my actions/decision to continue engaging with you in this matter.

So, thanks for the discussion, it's been an invaluable experience. I've read your opinions and input on the matter and rest assured they will be considered.
 
I would think that Dick MIGHT want lighter faster guys due to qb's like Manning and Brady *** raping his ******* defense every damn time they hit the field. That's just a guess, maybe St LeBeau liked Tommy ******* him every time they played, but I doubt it. Turns out big slow run stopping lb's can't do **** when you run a TE over the middle, especially when the ******* prick running the NFL says you're no longer allowed to knock them the **** out for doing it.
:rolleyes:
Joe

So now we have smaller faster guys that get beat on pass plays and can't stop the run or beat an offensive tackle, makes perfect sense.
 
I would think that Dick MIGHT want lighter faster guys due to qb's like Manning and Brady *** raping his ******* defense every damn time they hit the field. That's just a guess, maybe St LeBeau liked Tommy ******* him every time they played, but I doubt it. Turns out big slow run stopping lb's can't do **** when you run a TE over the middle, especially when the ******* prick running the NFL says you're no longer allowed to knock them the **** out for doing it.

Joe

We had all that last year and got *** raped by almost every team with a QB. We had Shazier, Timmons, Jones and Worilds. You can't get much smaller at LB than that. They were at the tail end of every single passing category. So I guess the *** raping will continue with the added benefit of not being able to stop the run either... wonderful.
 
We had all that last year and got *** raped by almost every team with a QB. We had Shazier, Timmons, Jones and Worilds. You can't get much smaller at LB than that. They were at the tail end of every single passing category. So I guess the *** raping will continue with the added benefit of not being able to stop the run either... wonderful.
I'm not saying you're wrong that we finished last, but how many games did we have that combination in?
 
I'm not saying you're wrong that we finished last, but how many games did we have that combination in?

Shazier was hurt a lot so they added in Spence and Williams. Jones was hurt so Harrison played some. Spence is small and Williams started only 2 games. They have drafted mostly smallish LBs so no matter the combination they are all (except for Harrison) of that ilk. Williams is 6' 240 lbs. All of them were drafted because of their athleticism and ability to cover RBs and TEs.

Remember the picture of Shazier, Jones, Harrison, Williams and Spence? They all look like average guys who work out except for Harrison. Jones looks more like an IT guy than a football player. His arms are small. They were all drafted to help in the passing game. The problem is that it hasn't worked and now they struggle with both the pass and the run.
 
Williams was in his second year, and for all intents and purposes, Spence was too.
You can't fault a guy for dislocating a wrist. that's not quite the same as nicks and dings.

you still didn't answer my question, which I asked because that is what you based your assessment on - the combination of Shazier, Timmons, Worilds and Jones.
to then change that parameter and say we're using Spence and Williams due to injury is changing how you should look at the problem and how we shifted in attempt to solve it. Williams nor Spence are really starting material. So you're stating that our backups should be gauged the same as other teams' starters. Which, I can understand, since we're using players available, but you can't focus all of that blame on the combination of Jones, Timmons, Shazier and Worilds. ****, apparently Worilds didnt have his head in the game last year. Shazier was a rookie and Jones was a second year guy playing decently well until his injury.
 
Williams was in his second year, and for all intents and purposes, Spence was too.
You can't fault a guy for dislocating a wrist. that's not quite the same as nicks and dings.

you still didn't answer my question, which I asked because that is what you based your assessment on - the combination of Shazier, Timmons, Worilds and Jones.
to then change that parameter and say we're using Spence and Williams due to injury is changing how you should look at the problem and how we shifted in attempt to solve it. Williams nor Spence are really starting material. So you're stating that our backups should be gauged the same as other teams' starters. Which, I can understand, since we're using players available, but you can't focus all of that blame on the combination of Jones, Timmons, Shazier and Worilds. ****, apparently Worilds didnt have his head in the game last year. Shazier was a rookie and Jones was a second year guy playing decently well until his injury.

It doesn't matter how many games they played together. You can give excuses all you want. The fact is that the entire LB unit is small and fast by design. They wanted Jones, Shazier, Timmons and Worilds as starters. Even if they play every game together they are small. Their backups are small. That's the issue. Spence and Williams played well IMHO. But again they aren't good against the pass. None of them are even when they are all healthy.

So if everyone is healthy who is the pass covering LB? Who is it? Remember that is the most important thing to keep from being destroyed by RBs and TEs and to make sure Brady doesn't kill them. So who are you putting on the field and are they good enough?
 
Shazier and Timmons are quite obviously our pass-covering LBs vs TEs.
I seriously doubt we see Deebo out there covering TEs or RBs by design.
 
Remember the picture of Shazier, Jones, Harrison, Williams and Spence? They all look like average guys who work out except for Harrison. Jones looks more like an IT guy than a football player. His arms are small. They were all drafted to help in the passing game. The problem is that it hasn't worked and now they struggle with both the pass and the run.

Who's the guy on the far left of that picture (Williams?), because he's built like a brick **** house! Shazier is cut as well. I will admit that Jones and Spence look like they're still in college. Hopefully the after pics will be better!
 
Shazier and Timmons are quite obviously our pass-covering LBs vs TEs.
I seriously doubt we see Deebo out there covering TEs or RBs by design.

If he gets to chuck him at the line he might be able to cover him, just keep knocking him down.
 
If he gets to chuck him at the line he might be able to cover him, just keep knocking him down.

just posting that gave Rog a shiver up his reptilian ginger spine and made him call Rob Kraft to consult on what sort of fine should be levied.
 
Shazier and Timmons are quite obviously our pass-covering LBs vs TEs.
I seriously doubt we see Deebo out there covering TEs or RBs by design.

Timmons had 1 PD last year... 1... he is straight ahead fast but struggle to cover TEs and RBs. Shazier may turn into that player but right now we don't know that.
 
Who's the guy on the far left of that picture (Williams?), because he's built like a brick **** house! Shazier is cut as well. I will admit that Jones and Spence look like they're still in college. Hopefully the after pics will be better!

Williams has bulked up some but he played at around 240 last year. Williams is closer to the typical ILB the Steelers had. The problem is that he can't cover in the passing game. He is also in Shazier's spot. As Shazier gets more playing time Williams will just be a backup. Shazier is cut but he is not very big. He's only 6'1 240 (he came out at 235).
 
Williams has bulked up some but he played at around 240 last year. Williams is closer to the typical ILB the Steelers had. The problem is that he can't cover in the passing game. He is also in Shazier's spot. As Shazier gets more playing time Williams will just be a backup. Shazier is cut but he is not very big. He's only 6'1 240 (he came out at 235).

I'd hope one of them would eventually replace Timmons when he declines.
 
I'd hope one of them would eventually replace Timmons when he declines.

Timmons still has several years left. I wouldn't look for his replacement on the team right now. Their real problems are on the outside. Jones and whoever the LOLB is going to be (Moats probably) scare no one on the outside.
 
Wow just like old times. All of the old gang is here. I missed you guys. Nothing like a Dri Archer/tomlin sucks thread to get the blood boiling. Rome wasn't built in a day. Dri has time to grow(no pun intended) and learn the game. Not ready to call him a bust by any means. For those saying he was passed up by Harris in the playoff game. He was never drafted to be a every down back so that's not a surprise. If Blount doesn't turn out to be a jackass that point is moot. I hope he can nail down the return duties next year. He sucked at It last year but so did the blocking. Besides a ankle injury he proved he can take a hit and not die on the field also didn't fumble. Hopefully a year in the weight room and experience will benefit him this year and he can make contribution
 
Top