Sevenisheaven
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2016
- Messages
- 254
- Reaction score
- 143
- Points
- 43
Every year folks rush on here to be the first to take a crap on one, two or all of the draft picks. Hell, I'm guilty of it myself because I really wanted Dobbins and was upset with the Claypool pick. But, I'll back Claypool and hope he becomes an All-Pro. I mean, you don't have to like the pick. But, at least give the kid a chance to actually suck before you say he sucks. lol
Im ok with Pool.....I would have taken Akers or JK.i think Akers is going to be great for the Rams.....he will thrive in a creative offensive system like Kamara did with the Saints. I realize with the talent on this team it's hard to get someone who will contribute when you get to 102 but we are thin at both lines, and with injury histories you can make an easy case for being thin at RB and TE too. So the chances of getting a solid backup for those positions that played against major talent in college will mean that pick will most likely contribute in 20. I dont see this kid contributing in 20 or 21. It doesnt accomplish much picking him. Hes a pet project and didn't we pick one in Ulysses last year? He too was a guy from a small school who had crazy production with a nonstop motor from a smaller school. Here's the difference between him and this kid.....he was picked really late I believe. They should have found a solid player either a lineman or TE or RB with that pick who ok had a real shot at co distributing due to I jury. This kid won't even play. Johnson played he was a 3rd Snell played he was a 4th .....they got opportunities .....we should have picked up a player of that caliber not pet project