- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,293
- Reaction score
- 19,388
- Points
- 113
I'm with you, I'd like to see someone UNITE this country. I'm also however a realist. The political game has gotten worse, more sinister, for decades.
Example: The more lobbyists affect Washington and line the pockets of politicians, the greater the game becomes, the greater the dollars become and the problem grows and grows.
Another Example: Urban violence. Violence begets violence. It takes a massive force to stop those types of tides. That's why we see places like Chicago get worse, and worse, and worse. It's rare to see someone like a Rudy G. come along and turn the tides in a place like NYC.
I'm merely pointing out that the political game shifted quite a bit under Obama. He told us what was important and to be protested, and ridiculed rights and values Americans held near and dear to their hearts at the same time. And people warned, it's going to come back...worse, if we get one of ours elected. And in ways it has. I wish Trump would do more to unite personally.
But don't be one of those people saying it started with Trump. It didn't. He's just elevating the game that's been played. And it'll keep getting worse until we have some fundamental change - a new dynamic change-agent President or something drastic happening in this country.
I'm by no means 100% on board with what this man does. But I do like the shake up. Very much. And I have little problem with him telling Americans - albeit not eloquently - boycott if you have a problem with a billion dollar enterprise that reaches millions of children and Americans portraying values you disagree with. No problem with that at all.
Just stop. Tim, I agree with 99% of what you post. But you are wrong on this. Even without his language on this issue, he has no right to tell, encourage, suggest, whatever--that people boycott any kind of business, billion dollar or otherwise. He should be encouraging discourse on this very sensitive subject, not trying to stifle it. He should be figuring out ways to get the right people at the table to figure these problems out. Instead, he may as well have called the protesters ni**ers. I mean blacks are the ones protesting, mostly. Calling them sons of ******* isn't any better. You can spin it any way you want, but the guy is out of line, and flat out wrong.