I just rammed facts up your ***. This is your response?
Go back to some ****** left-wing site and see if you can copy an actual response.
The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
I just rammed facts up your ***. This is your response?
Go back to some ****** left-wing site and see if you can copy an actual response.
But, but, but ... I identify as an aged, withered, dried-up, nasty, cantankerous, bitter old lesbian.
The noose is tightening!
This is it!! Avenatti brings him down! Russia brings him down! No, Mueller, that's it, brings him down! Cohen finishes him!! Ukraine, yeah, that's the ticket, Ukraine is the tipping walls closing in and tightening!!!
Please don't demean true American patriots. It dilutes your argument.
Oh wait. Here it comes........ a timeline of everything bad Trump has done over 3 years from Tibs. Amounting to nothing. 3...2...1....
Still Trump is only guilty of winning the election.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 10,264
- Reaction score
- 13,830
- Points
- 113
I can't figure out if you are racist/sizist/pantsist or if this is really about XXX porn.Oh, and I am seriously going to take advice about anything - ANYTHING - from this guy?
Jesus Christ, his pants have more "X's" than the 2002 Super Bowl.
please clarify.
With pics.
Sent from my SM-N950W using Steeler Nation mobile app
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,571
- Reaction score
- 6,246
- Points
- 113
I'd appreciate it if you kept your gay sex fantasies in check and not include me in your homoerotic longings. I have no issues with you being who you are. I won't judge or demean you, just don't project your own perverse sexual desires onto others. That's not cool, man.
I guess my question to you and your brilliant, unparalleled legal mind, is if Trump, Giuliani and Nunes are all so clearly innocent of any wrongdoing, that they were simply doing their jobs and acting in good faith by looking into 1. general corruption in Ukraine, and 2. possible criminal activity by the former Vice President and his son, why in the world have they been so secretive about it? Why has the WH refused to hand over legally subpoened documents? Why has Trump barred members of his cabinet and his government from testifying? Why did Nunes keep all of his contacts with Parnas secret? Why did Trump and those working for him go around the normal governmental channels to achieve these goals? Then deny and lie about all of it?
Rather odd, wouldn't you say, from the President on down, given they were perfectly in their right to do what they did - as you suggest - and were serving the best interests of the country and our national security.
He did it just to piss you off.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
You cant just make up accusations and use them as reasons for a fishing expedition, especially against the President. Come with evidence of a crime and let that compel discovery.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,252
- Reaction score
- 19,259
- Points
- 113
Apparently, the Washington Post thinks that Melania talks in code through the outfits she wears.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-melania-trump-coded-messages
https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-melania-trump-coded-messages
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
BOOM!
LOL
Rasmussen: Trump Approval Up 6 Points from November
President Donald Trump’s approval rating has risen to 52 percent among likely voters in the latest Presidential Tracking Poll from Rasmussen Reports.
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/a...onth=12&date=05&id=944662&oref=m.facebook.com
LOL
Rasmussen: Trump Approval Up 6 Points from November
President Donald Trump’s approval rating has risen to 52 percent among likely voters in the latest Presidential Tracking Poll from Rasmussen Reports.
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/a...onth=12&date=05&id=944662&oref=m.facebook.com
Not sure why anyone bothers with a response anymore.
Actually this is Tib's motivation with every word he posts. TDS, it's all he has.
MAGA!
Jim Cramer: These are the best jobs numbers of our lives
CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Friday no matter your view on President Donald Trump there’s no denying we’re living in the best labor market in more than a generation.
“You can’t contradict that these are the best numbers of our lives. You can’t,” Cramer, 64, said following the government report showing the U.S. economy created a better-than-expected 266,000 nonfarm jobs in November, with the unemployment rate dipping to 3.5%, matching a 50-year low. Economists had expected the jobless rate to hold steady at 3.6% last month.
“People don’t want to say good things” about the economy, said Cramer, echoing comments he made Thursday evening on “Mad Money,” telling investors: “Don’t let the armageddonists and the negativists and the hucksters scare you away from owning stocks.”
Referring to Trump, Cramer said Friday on “Squawk Box,” shortly after the jobs report was released, “It doesn’t matter whether you hate him or like him, these are real numbers.”
“This is the best number I’ve ever seen in my life,” Cramer said, zeroing in on the unemployment rate. “Fifty years ago, that number was a curse. Now it’s a blessing.” He added, “I don’t see inflation. I don’t see recession.”
Cramer said the strong U.S. job market is going to allow America to win the trade war with China. “The president can walk away from the table with this number.” He added: “In the end, the Chinese are going to have to put jobs here.”
Jim Cramer: These are the best jobs numbers of our lives
CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Friday no matter your view on President Donald Trump there’s no denying we’re living in the best labor market in more than a generation.
“You can’t contradict that these are the best numbers of our lives. You can’t,” Cramer, 64, said following the government report showing the U.S. economy created a better-than-expected 266,000 nonfarm jobs in November, with the unemployment rate dipping to 3.5%, matching a 50-year low. Economists had expected the jobless rate to hold steady at 3.6% last month.
“People don’t want to say good things” about the economy, said Cramer, echoing comments he made Thursday evening on “Mad Money,” telling investors: “Don’t let the armageddonists and the negativists and the hucksters scare you away from owning stocks.”
Referring to Trump, Cramer said Friday on “Squawk Box,” shortly after the jobs report was released, “It doesn’t matter whether you hate him or like him, these are real numbers.”
“This is the best number I’ve ever seen in my life,” Cramer said, zeroing in on the unemployment rate. “Fifty years ago, that number was a curse. Now it’s a blessing.” He added, “I don’t see inflation. I don’t see recession.”
Cramer said the strong U.S. job market is going to allow America to win the trade war with China. “The president can walk away from the table with this number.” He added: “In the end, the Chinese are going to have to put jobs here.”
Dumbest.
Response.
Ever.
Jesus, and that is a high bar given numerous of your other rants - "Russian agent!! Controlled by Russian mob!! Controlled by PUTIN!! Aaaaaahhhhh ..."
FINALLY you get something right.
Respond to my points with facts, please, not, "Oh yeah, what about ..." from some donkey **** leftist site. In reply:
- The White House and Presidents - ALL OF THEM - are universally secretive about communications with foreign leaders. What did Bammy tell Ukraine about concerns of corruption and Burisma? What did H.W. Bush tell the Chinese about Tiananmen square? What did Bammy tell the Israelis about Syria? We don't know, right, since those conversations ARE KEPT PRIVILEGED, BECAUSE THEY ARE, OH, I DON'T KNOW, PRIVILEGED.
- Why has Trump not "cooperated" with a corrupt, sleazy, lying, scheming House? You're serious? Did you know that 16 of the 24 Dims on the Judiciary panel have voted to impeach Trump BEFORE a ******* phone call?? Jesus Christ, yeah, he should turn over 100,000 pages and expect fair treatment. Or more likely 1/4 of a paragraph of 100,000 pages taken out of context and leaked by the lying leaker, Schiff.
- As to "legally subpoenaed documents." You are in over your head, Go back to Think Progress or Media Matters or some other Soros site and try to cobble together some drooling, irrelevant reply. Why do parties object to subpoenas which invade privilege, including attorney-client privilege and Executive privilege? Two reasons. First, as a matter of policy, those holding the privilege will assert the privilege to protect it. The fact that a subpoena meets the slim requirements to be "legal" means **** for invading privilege. I supoena your wife's medical records, or your kid's school records. The subpoena is "legal." Would you just sit idly by and let me obtain those records? Hey, maybe - MAYBE - something dispositive is contained, right? SO WHAT ARE YOU HIDING!?!? That is the first point.
- Second, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, if a party waives a privilege - which a party can do - the party runs the risk of waiving the privilege for all similar communications - a terrible idea for Executive privilege, a very long-held and recognized privilege that allows the Executive branch to have frank discussions with other world leaders and internally with staff. (See, e.g., Maldonado v. New Jersey, 225 F.R.D. 120, 128 (D.N.J. 2004) [waiver of the privilege can occur where privileged information is disclosed to a third party].)
- Why did Nunes keep communications with Parnes secret? Oh, I don't know, MAYBE BECAUSE DISCLOSING SUCH INFORMATION WOULD VIOLATE FEDERAL ******* LAW. Why didn't Schiff reveal all of the testimony in the SCIF before it was deemed non-privileged? Oh, I don't know, MAYBE BECAUSE DISCLOSING SUCH INFORMATION WOULD VIOLATE FEDERAL ******* LAW. You should change your name to "Rodney King" for purposes of this discussion.
- Why did Trump go around "normal government channels"? You mean, the people who spied on him beginning in 2016, who lied about Russia collusion, who twice tried to place a spy IN HIS CAMPAIGN, who tried to browbeat and threaten witnesses to turn over evidence against Trump, who have been in power as unelected State department lackeys for 30+ years and operate under the assumption that Presidents don't matter since "we'll be here long after he's gone," who leak information to hurt the President, who lie about the President? You mean, why didn't the President trust those people? Oh, and why did Kennedy "go around normal government channels" in dealing with the Russians in a spy exchange, and during the Cuban missile crisis? Those were okay, I guess, right? Using a private industry lawyer to trade a Russian spy for Gary Powers was all hunky-dory, right? He did that because he frankly did not trust a lot of his State Department, believing they were far too aggressive with Russia and would not get the job done as they were more worried about their own careers than actual results in the process. Sound familiar??
Back to you, Rodney.
Yes Obama, you piece of ****, Trump does have a magic wand and those jobs have been coming back regularly since he took office. He's proving you to be the incompetent imbecile that you are. GTFO of DC and stay at new place in Martha's Vineyard and never come back. Don't let the door hit 'ya where Moose splits 'ya. ************.
Rush nailed it. The Dims are consumed with TDS hatred, including hatred of us pro-Americans who elected him.