• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Steelers select Dri Archer in Round 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Idioteque said:
LOL. You read 20+ pages and copy/pasted my posts in 3-5 minutes? Never **** a *******!
Click to expand...
No, I didn't read 20+ pages, just skimmed through looking for posts written by an idiot, err, I mean written by idioteque, copy/pasted that into a text doc. Then of course I needed to quickly edit-out all the filler/b.s. crap which was like 75% of it, then hit the post button. So yes, I did that in under 5 minutes, probably not worth the effort.
 
Kordell Stewart won't be considered an even decent Quarterback UNTIL he has (whatever that number was). He gets the number, people hop on the board, and the OP says "He meant UNTIL in a different way". Always funny how as soon as someone might be held to a statement, no matter how solid they were (For instance "THERE WILL BE 10 GUYS WE WILL WISH WE HAD TAKEN" then suddenly someone says "Well, name em" and it turns into well, kinda wish we might have taken if things don't quite go the way we wish they had in a certain amount of time, all things considered, blah blah blah).

Joe
 
t-man said:
I'm sorry, so you are saying, in fact, that when you said he'd wash out, what you really meant to say was he has a chance of washing out. Right?
Click to expand...

Correct. Re-read my post.

Me said:
I think Archer will be something of a washout.
Click to expand...

I think.. I think.. I think.. I think.. sounds like an opinion.. but since your nose is lodged in my colon, I can see why you'd be so eager to call it a rock-solid, slam-dunk guarantee that I'm betting my life on.

Tell me, if you will, the difference between "I think Archer will be something of a washout" and "I think we'll beat the Ravens today"?

And when you said there WOULD be 10 guys we WOULD wish we had taken, and then went on to LIST those 10 guys, and I happened to mention I planned to call you on it, you then decided you meant there MIGHT be 10 guys, and he MIGHT wash out, and hell, you have no way of knowing after all, I mean jeezuz, don't put you on the spot like that, it's not like you've spent the entire ******* thread harping on how very very very very very unlikely it will be that this guy makes it though one season with us. Nah, we're all the ones misunderstanding what you're saying. It's not you.
Click to expand...

Re-read my posts.

BTW, WILL your list or WON'T it be correct in time?
Click to expand...

The fate of Idioteque's internet self-esteem depends on it!!
 
Idioteque said:
Correct. Re-read my post.



I think.. I think.. I think.. I think.. sounds like an opinion.. but since your nose is lodged in my colon, I can see why you'd be so eager to call it a rock-solid, slam-dunk guarantee that I'm betting my life on.

Tell me, if you will, the difference between "I think Archer will be something of a washout" and "I think we'll beat the Ravens today"?



Re-read my posts.



The fate of Idioteque's internet self-esteem depends on it!!
Click to expand...

I get it you "think" it, but you're in now way certain enough of it to actually stand behind it. You are, however, certain enough of it to say it 300 different ways in the same thread. Just not quite enough to actually make a statement.

Because, then, you might actually have to admit you were wrong, so, rather than nut the **** up and state it and take your chances, you'll play the typical "I said MIGHT" game, so you can claim you were right either way.

Seems like you wasted a LOT of time on something you're not all that sure on all the sudden.

Joe
 
beat-around-the-bush.jpg

.................................
 
Vader said:
How is that any worse than people bitching about long threads on a message board? Don't like the subject? Don't like the thread? I think you know how to rectify that situation right?
Click to expand...

If you read my original post, and the post I quoted (spike's), you'd see we weren't complaining about it, just laughing at the fact that it's gone on this long. Then Idioteque chimed in because he thought it was all about him, AND THEN came the post you are replying to. Nice try tho cupcake
 
Idioteque said:
I gave up on the Archer debate long, long ago. Now I'm trying to wade through t-man's and andrew's bullshit accusations. But you're right: it doesn't matter. Time to walk away.

High horse. LOL. Only on SN do we have such sensitive, whiny pussiness.
Click to expand...

509 posts.

400 in this thread, no???
 
Tibs said:
Idioteque, not sure why everyone around here thinks you're a Debbie Downer who's been piling-on the negativity re Archer starting from page 1 of this thread. I stopped midway, around page 20, but this is a decent rundown of your "fair and balanced" analysis of the Archer pick:
Click to expand...

That sir, was an uppercut...
 
insaniti said:
If you read my original post, and the post I quoted (spike's), you'd see we weren't complaining about it, just laughing at the fact that it's gone on this long. Then Idioteque chimed in because he thought it was all about him, AND THEN came the post you are replying to. Nice try tho cupcake
Click to expand...

Doesn't take away from the point that YOU are complaining about it. But nice spin fruitloop.
 
t-man said:
I get it you "think" it, but you're in now way certain enough of it to actually stand behind it. You are, however, certain enough of it to say it 300 different ways in the same thread. Just not quite enough to actually make a statement.

Because, then, you might actually have to admit you were wrong, so, rather than nut the **** up and state it and take your chances, you'll play the typical "I said MIGHT" game, so you can claim you were right either way.

Seems like you wasted a LOT of time on something you're not all that sure on all the sudden.

Joe
Click to expand...

Oh I absolutely stand behind it. My opinion of Archer hasn't wavered. My question is why is that suddenly a guarantee? When did I claim that my predictions were ironclad and always correct? And why are you pissing your pants over the idea of it being wrong? And why am I taking up so much of your day(s)?
 
poor idiot. gets called on his attention-whoring ways and his ***** gets bruised.
 
Vader said:
Doesn't take away from the point that YOU are complaining about it. But nice spin fruitloop.
Click to expand...

If you say so, I was making a point. This thread could go to 400 pages, considering who is posting in it, and it's not going to bother me at all. The direct response to Idioteque was because he assumed it was about him and immediately went to his hyperbole excuses that he loves to throw out there. If you can tell me that this hasn't been the same arguments over and over, I'll concede. This thread is no longer a discussion, it's a pissing contest that no one can win. But I guess you'll always back up your buddy right?
 
Idioteque said:
Oh I absolutely stand behind it. My opinion of Archer hasn't wavered. My question is why is that suddenly a guarantee? When did I claim that my predictions were ironclad and always correct? And why are you pissing your pants over the idea of it being wrong? And why am I taking up so much of your day(s)?
Click to expand...

I stand firmly behind my prediction that Archer either will or will not be successful in the NFL!

That's amazing right there. Truly amazing.

I enjoy coming here, I have time between installs, and it helps pass the day. I'm always amazed at how fixated people get on how much time other people spend doing things.

At any rate, yes, you will most certainly be right if you don't make any bold statements. And you've done a great job at showing your level of confidence in your own predictions, ****, if you don't believe them why the hell should anyone else?

Joe
 
insaniti said:
If you say so, I was making a point. This thread could go to 400 pages, considering who is posting in it, and it's not going to bother me at all. The direct response to Idioteque was because he assumed it was about him and immediately went to his hyperbole excuses that he loves to throw out there. If you can tell me that this hasn't been the same arguments over and over, I'll concede. This thread is no longer a discussion, it's a pissing contest that no one can win. But I guess you'll always back up your buddy right?
Click to expand...

Changing the point I see. The fact is that you were complaining about it. I don't care about the circumstances, it doesn't take away the fact that you willing came into a thread and started bitching about it.

There is a reason this is no longer a discussion about Archer... some of your "buddies" turned it into a ***** fest about the word "guarantee". Which is ridiculous on a message board.
 
t-man said:
I stand firmly behind my prediction that Archer either will or will not be successful in the NFL!

That's amazing right there. Truly amazing.

I enjoy coming here, I have time between installs, and it helps pass the day. I'm always amazed at how fixated people get on how much time other people spend doing things.

At any rate, yes, you will most certainly be right if you don't make any bold statements. And you've done a great job at showing your level of confidence in your own predictions, ****, if you don't believe them why the hell should anyone else?

Joe
Click to expand...

The ****? Exactly how much bolder should I be? I've actually been pretty specific in fact. When did I waver? When have I predicted success? I'm sorry you can't grasp the difference between a prediction and a guarantee.

You have spent entirely too much time (and created too many Google docs, LOL) on me.

Yip yip yip
 
Bigappleyinzer said:
If we are going to dedicate a thread of mindless and monotonous arguments, then I want to see it reach 50 pages dammit!!
Click to expand...
Ah, I see. That's what I thought you meant, I wanted to add a post or two just to make sure. ;)
 
Let's get our collective focus back on --- the Golden Flash!

Dri-Archer-Cover.jpg


flash_secretfiles_cover1.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top