Why not personal Howitzers Tim, or bazookas, or RPG's for the soccer moms? How dare anyone limit citizens' right to bear arms?
Why not? Seriously, exactly why should lawful, non-criminal citizens be denied the right to own a bazooka or RPG? 100% serious question here.
Do you feel the same about restrictions on other Constitutional rights, say, abortion?
That is what I mean by common sense gun laws,
Liberals and their stupid, inane tropes. "Common sense" gun laws. Oh **** off. Like 10-way waiting periods? So ten days is common sense, but nine days? Right-wing extremism. And precluding buying ammunition in the mail. Cuz making a guy drive to a sporting goods shop or gun store is a proven method to preventing gun violence, right?
You want "common sense" gun laws that would actually do something about the ongoing mass murders in our city? Then target those laws only at the population in Chicago, New York, Newark, Los Angeles, Miami, etc. that is doing the killing, since that is where the gun murders are happening. Why the **** does every ******* gun law target suburban and rural gun owners??
Oh, wait, Chicago, New York, Newark, Los Angeles, Miami, etc. already HAVE such gun laws?!? Huh. Almost as if you moron dicksuckers want to take guns only away from non-criminals in suburban and rural areas with these "common sense" gun laws.
Every law-abiding citizen has full 2nd amendment rights. That's inalienable, it's right there in the Constitution. I dare say, for the common good, certain high-caliber, military-grade weapons should be available to those with a special permit.
Where exactly do you find that restriction in the Constitution?
Oh, and what caliber exactly? 5.56 (common in the AR-15)? That is the grown-up relative to the .22 since the AR-15 can also fire .223 rounds. Or so my neighbor tells me. .308? You mean one of the most common rounds for hunting deer, moose, other big game? So you want to ban common hunting ammunition because ... why exactly? Mass murder of moose?
Further, what is "military-grade"? Liberals are such devoted liars and are so mind-numbed and stupid that they repeat these mantras like some buzzed Hare Krishna at an airport circa 1982. Do you mean scary looking barrel shrouds, designed to keep us from burning our hands on a hot barrel? Folding stocks so we can fit the rifle into a carrying case? What exactly? Automatic weapons, which is actually the characteristic of a "military weapon"? Already outlawed except for very limited circumstances involving FFL dealers.
Liberals ... stupid people who think they know more than others.
Call me a limp-wristed liberal all you want,
You are a limp-wristed liberal who enjoys the taste of semen.
And I support universal background checks.
Already in place for any retail location that sells firearms. The ONLY effect is to prevent private parties from selling guns to each other, or making a gift of guns to family members.
Why? Exactly what crime statistics do you have, Mr. "Common Sense," that private party sales and gifts are involved in any significant part of gun crimes? Yeah, thought so. Liberals ... too stupid to know how dumb they are,
Other than that, you can arm yourselves to the teeth, as I'm sure most of you have.
Not me. Guns scare me.
And "other than that"? As in, "other than that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln"? Liberals ... too stupid to understand that joke. Somebody explain it to Tibsy.
Nobody's gonna take away your ******* guns.
So banning certain calibers and making ownership of those guns would not constitute "taking away" guns? And imposing an $800 yearly fee for every firearm and a registration fee for every firearm, totaling thousands upon thousands of dollars every year and making ownership incredibly expensive, far too expensive for the vast majority of Americans, would not be "taking away" guns?
Stop being such a stupid ******* idiot for one minute and read the detailed post I provided on the proposed gun legislation, HR 127. I show you are 100% wrong.
As usual.
