What the hell happened to two feet down or one knee with possession equals a catch, there was no confusion then
Sent from my XT1585 using Steeler Nation mobile app
Sent from my XT1585 using Steeler Nation mobile app
[video]http://m.steelers.com/videos/videos/HIGHLIGHT-Grimble-dives-for-a-20-yard-touchdown/e2f3aa3f-afc7-47df-a8e1-f46ed91171fc[/video]
What's the difference?????
Are you ******* high?My 5 Wide did its job.
What the hell happened to two feet down or one knee with possession equals a catch, there was no confusion then
Sent from my XT1585 using Steeler Nation mobile app
It's ******, the NFL guy that explains it on Twitter begins by saying Ben COMPLETES the pass, they don't even know what the **** they're looking at. And there's still no clear view to over rule iti think it all started with some coach on the competition committee lost a game because his WR caught a ball with 2 feet down and he was hit almost immediately and it was called a fumble. So then they made the push that there has to be something else beyond just the 2 feet so that it's not a fumble if the hit come so quickly.
That's when we got the "football move". That was the start of it going downhill. Then there were complaints about what constitutes a football move. So they just kept defining it again and again, adding to it. Now we have this nonsense.
Does anyone see anything in the rule about crossing the plane after the catch was already made and diving into the endzone? I do not see it. Only article 3, item 1 that is irrelevant because by the Rule of TD the TD was already scored.
Item 1 states catches made in the endzone, not a runner/receiver diving for a TD that already established a catch.
We where robbed.
Ok. That is wrong. TD rule overrides that as the TD was scored before control of football come into question.