READ post 171
good luck
Salute the nation
lol.post 171 still refused to answer the question.
why dont you try?
READ post 171
good luck
Salute the nation
lol.post 171 still refused to answer the question.
why dont you try?
EASY ANSWER if you read
I would take BEN ROETHLISBERGER over Mathew Stafford any day of the week. PRETTY ******* simple. I'm glad we signed EBRON to a very friendly back up TE contract that is cap friendly should he NOT pan out.
I could care less what you think of stafford vs BEN because stafford isn't my beloved STEELERS starting QB. EBRON has the makings to be a definite up-grade over Vannett. Again pretty simple answer.
Salute the nation
omg...what does taking ben over stafford have to do with this?
how is this so hard for you to understand.
YOU said ebron had 'iffy' qbs. I provided stats that absolutely prove otherwise.
now both of you guys start adding in stuff like playoffs, division titles etc to change the subject
so no, nothing was explained regarding how edbron would have been better if it wasnt for stafford and luckl being iffy qbs
making or winning in the playoffs dont change their stats(which are better than bens).
i still dont grasp it.
please explain to me how those two qbs not making/winning playoff games or division titles negatively affected ebrons stats.
just back up your claim with relevant information. ITS NOT THAT HARD if true
can you please address the 4 wrs that i showed you that stafford "raised", when you said he didnt do any?
making or winning in the playoffs dont change their stats(which are better than bens)
This thread ...
![]()
Adding playoffs and SB conversation isn't changing the subject that is all a part of playing QB. You are judged on your regular season and post season success or failures.
Again we can go around and around. He is a good fantasy league QB but that is all I am giving him. He hasn't even won one division title, one.
You are banking way too much on regular season stats instead of the stats that matter.
ZERO division wins
ZERO playoff wins.
And I will say this one more time try to grasp it
Ebron's stats aren't bad,
This right here proves you aren't too bright. .So we will agree to disagree.
You fancy yourself intelligent do you? Then you know that fantasy QB isn't in Ben's league it is a ****** comparison and that SBs, playoff wins, and division titles matter. You won lulz what a maroon. I am sure you have won many window licking contests congrats.when the person you are arguing with cant answer a few simple questions, you know you have won.
when a guy blames someone else as not being bright, smart etc etc.because they cant argue intelligently, you know you have won
when a person changes narratives, you know you have won.
I WIN
omg...what does taking ben over stafford have to do with this?
how is this so hard for you to understand.
YOU said ebron had 'iffy' qbs. I provided stats that absolutely prove otherwise.
now both of you guys start adding in stuff like playoffs, division titles etc to change the subject
so no, nothing was explained regarding how edbron would have been better if it wasnt for stafford and luckl being iffy qbs
making or winning in the playoffs dont change their stats(which are better than bens).
i still dont grasp it.
please explain to me how those two qbs not making/winning playoff games or division titles negatively affected ebrons stats.
just back up your claim with relevant information. ITS NOT THAT HARD if true
can you please address the 4 wrs that i showed you that stafford "raised", when you said he didnt do any?
wow, two dumb ......ers right above me..............
wow, two dumb ......ers right above me..............
I think Ben is probably themost excited about the Ebron pick. If both Ebron and Mcdonald stay healthy, we will have a very different 2 tight end set that we have had in forever
when the person you are arguing with cant answer a few simple questions, you know you have won.
when a guy blames someone else as not being bright, smart etc etc.because they cant argue intelligently, you know you have won
when a person changes narratives, you know you have won.
I WIN
Not even my friends who are Deepthroat Lions fans consider Stafford a good QB. Though he is statistically. We've had plenty of them over the years. Vinnie Testaverde, Phillip Rivers, Tony Romo, etc..
Stafford's best years was when he had a HOF receiver. Without Megatron, he wasn't as good, though I'll admit 2016 was his best year of distributing the football. With Tate, Bolden, Jones, and Ebron. Though that team was one dimensional as ****. Top rusher had 357 yards. Of course you're putting up passing yards if you can't move it on the ground. This is the definition of fantasy passing stats. Pick a QB that is good, that has a terrible rushing attack. They will put up numbers.
If you aren't here to talk football hit the road fuckface.
Sent from my moto g(7) power using Steeler Nation mobile app
Excellent post Cope4 and then add this in, Stafford lifetime 69-82 for a .457 win percentage. That means he is playing from behind more often than not. That translates to fantasy football stats.
You mention friends well I've go a good buddy is diehard red wings / lions and a few years back he said to me, why was I born into a lions fan........ ****, I'd much rather be a STEELERS fan. The year before Stafford was drafted they went winless and I felt so bad for my friend. The next year they got Stafford and when they won their first game we HOOPed and HOLLerd for him you'dA thought it was a STEELERS super bowl win..!!! I think the Stafford led Lions only won 2 games that season. **** Stafford.
Salute the nation
i am here to talk football. now i know what ******* to avoid that dont know the game.
when the person you are arguing with cant answer a few simple questions, you know you have won.
when a guy blames someone else as not being bright, smart etc etc.because they cant argue intelligently, you know you have won
when a person changes narratives, you know you have won.
I WIN