Looks like the Steelers didn't want a repeat of last year. No *glaring* need now in the first round. Interesting this happened after Bush's pro day.
It likely means Bush is gone before pick #20, and Barron is the staring ILB / nickel solution.
Allen is a guaranteed nothing. Edmunds will stay in the more traditional SS position.
ILB used to be such an easy position to find because of its responsibilities. With the passing offenses and changing defenses, there aren't a lot of guys who can play well in this role now.
Agreed on both accounts.. I’m just trying to figure out why we like these “tweener” players so much. If we’re going to go after a S, get a FS who can run and cover. If we’re going after an ILB, get a pure ILB who can stay on the field for 3 downs
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
As if plucking a DB off a team with the worst pass defense in the NFL wasn't enough, Tombert has to one up that and sign a player off a team with one of the worst run defenses in the NFL. Is that a SB I smell?
Man on a mission. Hungry to play with a winnah!Mark Barron calls out his doubters on Twitter
![]()
The Los Angeles Rams had one of the worst run defenses in the NFL last season, ranking 28th in yards allowed. That falls on a number of players, from the linebackers to the defensive linemen, but a big portion of that blame was put on Alec Ogletree and Mark Barron.
https://theramswire.usatoday.com/20...k-barron-twitter-pff-stat-linebacker-ranking/
-------------------------------
Ever since they lost Ryan Shazier to a tragic injury late during the 2017 season, the Steelers have yet to find a way to adequately replace him on the football field.
Barron, a former first-round pick of the Buccaneers, was cut by the Rams earlier this month.
Over the past four seasons, he averaged roughly 70 solo tackles, one sack, and one interception per season.
He ended his run with the Rams on a high note with strong performances in the playoffs and the Super Bowl
The signing of Barron, a very flawed player, should not prohibit the Steelers from drafting a linebacker at No. 20 if one of the top prospects -- like Devin Bush -- is available. He should not be viewed as a long-term solution. He graded out poorly by Pro Football Focus' metrics, getting labeled as "one of Los Angeles' liabilities defensively."
But if a linebacker isn't available at No. 20, the Steelers have given themselves a bit of cover by signing Barron.
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...pick-mark-barron-to-two-year-12-million-deal/
Barron's play plummeted last season and will need to be much better if he expects to compete for reps ahead of ILB Jon Bostic.
I'm sure he's already better than Jason Worilds, Jarvis Jones, and Jarvis Durpee.
Two-years, $12 million
Are we done yet?
The Rams initially released Barron in early March with the idea they could re-sign him in the open market.
He'll instead play behind Vince Williams in the middle of DC Keith Butler's modified version of the 4-3 defense.
30 in October, Barron's play plummeted last season and will need to be much better if he expects to compete for reps ahead of ILB Jon Bostic.
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1107396056046817281
I get so tired of you bitching in every thread. You sound like a *****.
I get so tired of you bitching in every thread. You sound like a *****.
WTF???
Im posting articles!!!
I didnt say ******* ****!!!!
U want me to stop posting?
fine im done
also, he was last listed at 230 pounds, 6'1" frameAlabama safety Mark Barron performed well in front of judging eyes. Barron is recovering from bilateral sports hernia surgery, but it didn't show. His 40-yard dash time of 4.53 is just fine for safeties, and he posted a 10'2" broad jump.
WTF???
Im posting articles!!!
I didnt say ******* ****!!!!
U want me to stop posting?
fine im done
Two article that state how bad the Rams run defense was, how bad he is etc. Then you ask "are we done yet" .. I'm taking that you mean you think all their moves suck and you want them to stop making bad moves.
I only ever see your posts saying how everyone sucks etc. So no idea you weren't trying to be negative