• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

College Football 12/1

So is the idea that the SEC is. See the bowl record last year. The polls are a shame, inflating SEC's SOS, with artificially inflated rankings every year. Play OOC schedules that have true home and away games and quit the B.S. FCS games to inflate wins.

I don't remember the bowl record last year. Why don't you post it. Anyway one year of bowl records doesn't mean ****. I'll take a stab at it anyway... higher ranked Big 10 teams played lower ranked SEC teams would be my guess. The SEC had 2 in the playoffs and the Big 10 had zero. So that means the Big 10 leaders were playing lower ranked teams from other conferences....

Also please stop about the schedule. Who the hell has OSU played? How about Michigan? Fluff out of conference schedule and fluff in conference schedule. At least Bama played a home and home with Florida ST. last year and year before. Who the **** is OSU playing? Talk about artificial inflation. Oregon State (2-12), TCU (6-6) and ******* Tulane who I didn't even know had a football program anymore (6-6)... wow what a ******* hard schedule.
 
The Bog ten has been locked out of the playoffs 2 straight years, that tells you all you need to know.
 
Ohio Stare was ranked way to high after struggle in Indiana, Perdue and Minnesota, the experts had the perfect chance to show they were not bias towards certain conferences and names when they once more shunned UCF. The experts could rank with big boys but once more did not watch the come back and dominance by UCF and a QB that had not played. ND did not play a championship game and you have them three and Oklahoma played a championship game and they are 4. The experts don't quite look so knowledgably after their choices.
 
I don't remember the bowl record last year. Why don't you post it. Anyway one year of bowl records doesn't mean ****. I'll take a stab at it anyway... higher ranked Big 10 teams played lower ranked SEC teams would be my guess. The SEC had 2 in the playoffs and the Big 10 had zero. So that means the Big 10 leaders were playing lower ranked teams from other conferences....

Also please stop about the schedule. Who the hell has OSU played? How about Michigan? Fluff out of conference schedule and fluff in conference schedule. At least Bama played a home and home with Florida ST. last year and year before. Who the **** is OSU playing? Talk about artificial inflation. Oregon State (2-12), TCU (6-6) and ******* Tulane who I didn't even know had a football program anymore (6-6)... wow what a ******* hard schedule.

How about you SEC guys stop pretending like every single SEC conference game is some Herculean task. Texas A&M and Missouri were middle of the road teams that entered into the terrifying SEC and they’ve done OK. We were told they’d be bottom feeders every year both walked in and played for SEC titles.

Face it, Bama and Georgia are really good. The rest of the SEC is not special this year.

I said Penn State would have been 2nd in either SEC division. This year that meant 5-3 SEC record. Yes, i’m confident Penn State would have gone at least 5-3 in either SEC division.

the fact you find it laughable is all the proof of SEC homerism that’s needed.
 
Penn state would win the Pac12. I think they would win the big 12 also. They’d be second best team in ACC. I think they would have finished second in either SEC division.

They'd have a decent chance at the Pac 12. No way with the Big 12, not enough offensive firepower to keep up. Oklahoma would smoke them.
 
Top