We could resign Spence, Garvin and Todmann for less than Weddle will get...Id take some depth over an aging past prime cast off
Adding Weddle next to Mitchell makes our secondary look pretty good if we can add the right pieces at corner. Don't underestimate how much NOT having a Troy Polamalu type player showed our ****** secondary.
I was going to say, they cost that much less than Weddle for a good reason.
I'd argue that there is no good reason.
You really want to overpay for a 31 year old Safety? Hell, even Polamalu 'retired' at the age of 33.
Weddle feels to me like the name brand free agent that doesnt ever live up to the bill.. He is the wrong age to be tossing big bills at... Cheap great... But id literally rather go in to the season with golden and mitchell and a draft pick or two than spend big bills there
SS and Blake's corner was arguably the weakest areas on D.
..........Upgrade both of those spots will give the D a fighting chance to get off the field....
I don't get the fascination with Weddle, but if his price drops and he does sign here I will be the first person in line cheering him on.
Weddle is way past his prime. His tackles dropped off 30% last year with no turnovers of any kind. At 31 he's not going to find the fountain of youth so I would prefer waiting or signing Tyvon Branch at 29 who when healthy is a very good safety and with us signing Golden we can limit his snap count or at least monitor it wisely. I would take Todman, Garvin, and Spence with Branch over Weddle.
At his age he is not worth more than 5 mil/yr on a 3 year deal. Oakland has a ton of $$$, so they will outbid others and probably sign him. I have no issues with drafting a solid safety in rds 2-3 and have him be behind Golden. I would love to get Weddle, but not for more than 5 mil/yr.