- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,047
- Reaction score
- 5,164
- Points
- 113
Learn yourself the difference between “definitive” and “potential causal association”.
Learn yourself the difference between “definitive” and “potential causal association”.
😂 17 million killed by the vaccine! 1,300 side effects including deja vu!
So Pfizer is wrong to suggest that the vaccines may not have a causal relationship to deja vu? HTFG, Tim!
When you post 11 paragraphs to respond to 4 sentences, you have been epically owned.
Somewhere in those 830+ pages are multiple people attempting to educate Tim that VAERS data only includes POSSIBLE side effects. Simple minded and juvenile is dismissing that FACT and considering the side effects listed as verified.
😂 So you have logically concluded that the vaccine has killed people 1,223 different ways? Or was that just fanaticism?Including - documented by Pfizer - 1,223 events with a fatal outcome
You're severe inability to comprehend the English language and comprehend logic never ceases to astound.
Pfizer submitted a BLA saying including nine pages of adverse event reports for their vaccine.
Pfizer then said (when called out on it) 'they may not be linked to the vaccine.
Which is the truth and which is the lie?
The only thing you've ever owned are those dogs you kill when your fat *** walks 437 miles a week.
I tirelessly try to provide you facts, logic and sense. Your one sentence replies are empty, dodging, topic-changing deflections. We know you don't read. Try it at some point. Once. Maybe once?
What? You can’t be THAT clueless. Go back and read the Reuters article slowly.
Tim said they were definitive because, well, who knows why?
Pfizer very professionally and politely explained that they may not have any causal relationship.
😂 So you have logically concluded that the vaccine has killed people 1,223 different ways? Or was that just fanaticism?
WTF? I said YOU believe all AEs are confirmed.Your superior, your Alpha, has never indicated that all reported AEs are confirmed side effects. Go prove it Beta.
If you’re not saying it’s definitive, what the **** is your point? Another milk toast “I’m not saying, I’m just saying” walk back.It would appear you need to. This is from Pfizer's BLA.
View attachment 12502
Suggest you go to page 16 and start reading the table 7. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/upload...bFmMO_QQS5eGQAV7feZ9RP8mRqniiZR7sD0CMeRGryWfg
Take some time, there's a lot.
Example:
View attachment 12503
Again, InspectorFlogg, provide evidence that I said definitive about that list.
Didn't the board idiot say may not = may?
no, dipshit. we're saying precisely what Pfizer did do be said say.WTF? I said YOU believe all AEs are confirmed.
(Hint: it's the fourth goddamned sentence)The document was submitted by Pfizer as part of its Biological License Application (BLA) to the United States Federal Drug Administration (FDA) (here).
😂 So you think Pfizer reports AEs to itself and then shares them with others?no, dipshit. we're saying precisely what Pfizer did do be said say.
if you were to slowly click that Reuters article... located here: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2VK1G1/
then find this sentence:
(Hint: it's the fourth goddamned sentence)
click where it says (here) - which is the last goddamned word in the ******* sentence and be taken to a PDF.
this is the PDF summation of what Pfizer submitted to the FDA.
Not @Tim Steelersfan. Not @Steeltime. Not @Confluence. Not me.
(though we are, far and away, your absolute primary superiors and you'll never amount to as much as the bits of corn or cashews in our ****)
when you find yourself on that PDF, then click on the magnifying glass at the top of the screen
this is "Find"
type "deja vu" in the search field and hit enter.
on page 3fucking2 you'll see that PFIZER listed deja vu as an adverse event.
not Reuters. not your primary superiors. not the barista at Starbucks with your grande vive soy banana milk oat churned sunflower latte with 18 triple pumps of caramel.
Reuters reported what Pfizer said.
your issue is with Pfizer. and the Starbucks barista. Wilford Brimley telling you about dibeetus, hershey's and your picture plastered at county kennels saying "do not let ze adopt ANY ******* animal"
d.i.p.s.h.i.t.
i'll type this as slowly as ******* possible😂 So you think Pfizer reports AEs to itself and then shares them with others?
Report Prepared by:
Worldwide Safety
Pfizer
Wrong. Some nut job associated his deja vu with getting the vaccine and reported it to Pfizer. Pfizer was required to share it with the FDA regardless of its comical nature. Tim unwittingly (I hope) tried to use it to validate his anti-vax fanaticism. That is epically comical.i'll type this as slowly as ******* possible
p
f
i
z
e
r
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
t
h
i
s
t
o
t
h
e
F
D
A
oh, well, close the thread. Inspector Flogseau has solved the case!Wrong. Some nut job associated his deja vu with getting the vaccine and reported it to Pfizer. Pfizer was required to share it with the FDA regardless of its comical nature. Tim unwittingly (I hope) tried to use it to validate his anti-vax fanaticism. That is epically comical.
Wrong. Some nut job associated his deja vu with getting the vaccine and reported it to Pfizer. Pfizer was required to share it with the FDA regardless of its comical nature. Tim unwittingly (I hope) tried to use it to validate his anti-vax fanaticism. That is epically comical.
Physical examination is the process of evaluating objective anatomic findings through the use of observation, palpation, percussion, and auscultation. The information obtained must be thoughtfully integrated with the patient's history and pathophysiology.
The vax spiders are eating his cerebrum.You really, genuinely are this dumb, aren't you?
WTF? I said YOU believe all AEs are confirmed.
If you’re not saying it’s definitive, what the **** is your point? Another milk toast “I’m not saying, I’m just saying” walk back.
Tim unwittingly (I hope) tried to use it to validate his anti-vax fanaticism. That is epically comical.
You really, genuinely are this dumb, aren't you?
Guess how every doctor in every nation over the past 200 years obtains information about symptoms, effects, physical status, mental status, and change in health? Go ahead, I'll wait ...
Naah, you're too dumb for me to wait so let me explain: Doctors get their information about what a patient is feeling from ... hold on for this ... THE PATIENT!
"wHuT AbOuT KatMrI sKaNz, HuH?"
Know why the doctor takes a CT scan or MRI of the heart, or the brain, or the liver, or the colon? Based on what the patient says is bothering him!!
Don't take my word on it? Okay, how about the National Library of Medicine:
Reference Source for Dr. Flogstain von Booster Regarding Medicine
The "patient's history and pathophysiology" is what the patient tells the doctor about his condition.
Idiot.
This document provides an integrated analysis of the cumulative post-authorization safety data, including U.S. and foreign post-authorization adverse event reports received through 28 February 2021.
Pfizer’s safety database contains cases of AEs reported spontaneously to Pfizer, cases reported by the health authorities, cases published in the medical literature, cases from Pfizer-sponsored marketing programs, non-interventional studies, and cases of serious AEs reported from clinical studies regardless of causality assessment.
Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries.