Because he drafted Ben and Heath and signed Deebo and Greg Warren. (j/k)
If they make a serious SB run I'm waiting for everyone who boycotted team over the signing of Dog Killer to come back.
Where's all my Tomin haters who were talking all that "5 years w/o playoff win" ****
- Thread starter Steel Vanguard
- Start date
Because he drafted Ben and Heath and signed Deebo and Greg Warren. (j/k)
If they make a serious SB run I'm waiting for everyone who boycotted team over the signing of Dog Killer to come back.
Who is bitching??? An accurate pass and all of a sudden its a good call..like any other play that doesn't work whether because of a missed block wrong cut dropped pass when those things happen its a bad play call. When the play is executed its a great call..that's my point. Not bitching at all..
Steel Vanguard
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2015
- Messages
- 1,175
- Reaction score
- 540
- Points
- 113
The scary thing is: Ron Mexico may actually have to start that game should we get that far. Landry is horrid.
I think I used the words "not great".. he played decent the past two games, NOT GREAT. The Ravens game he was TERRIBLE.
Stop putting words in people's mouths and calm the **** down..you get very defensive when someone mentions Ben not playing great.
He's a great QB, he needs to play like he did vs. Broncos in the 2nd half to have a chance to go deep in the playoffs.
Who hates Ben?? I surely do not. This team aint **** without him..he is our best player. Cause I said he threw an inaccurate pass I hate him? Reach much???
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1,905
- Reaction score
- 2,927
- Points
- 113
I think you're right but I doubt Tomlin sees it that way. At least Vick is a threat to break the pocket and take off. That could open up things downfield. Landry is just a sitting duck that has trouble hitting a barn door - if he could find one.
Landry problem is he decides who he throwing too in the huddle. He locks on and throw s it there no matter what. Its fine if the player gets open and disastrous if he doesn't. He just throws it anyway. 4 years in the offense and he can't find his second read smh
I'm right here. He still blows goats. Get us number 7 and we'll talk.
Landry > Ron Mexico
I say play them both If Ben can't play. Make the Broncos prepare for everything
I'm perfectly calm... just don't understand how a QB rating of 103 in a blowout win, and a 92 QB rating in a downpour with a game-winning drive after being injured, are only "decent" games to you. You said it, not me.
What-the-****-ever, man. Good thing Ben dragged his *** off the bench and saved your hero from another postseason one-and-out, so you and the rest of nuthuggers can tell me how great he is for the next ten years. Tomlin rulz.
Ah, once again.. words in my mouth. I'm not even close to the biggest Tomlin fan here but I will acknowledge the good things he does.
I also don't blame him for every loss and every short coming in a single game like a lot of people on here.
Ben played a decent game vs. Browns with a good 4th quarter of football, if you think otherwise then you clearly didn't watch the game.
Before the Ravens game Ben was playing better than any other QB in the league.
I'll reiterate for the 3rd time to you, I think he needs to get back that level of playing for us to go deep in the playoffs.. that's my whole point.
Without Ben the team is done.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 12,476
- Points
- 113
Landry showed he can run OUR offense this season. Vick has shown he just SUCKS.
They both suck. Landry and Vick. Landry knows the offense but throws picks. Vick doesn't or didn't know the offense but didn't turn it over either..bottom line if Ben doesnt play its going to take a monumental defensive effort and mistake free offense to win
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 12,476
- Points
- 113
Yeah that is all I want...... Vick throwing 9 of 14 for 31 yards but no TO's.
I said they both suck but the bottom line we were in all the games he started because he didn't turn it over to go with his bad play.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 14,557
- Reaction score
- 12,476
- Points
- 113
Yeah OK. Our O game plan with Vick was.... Screen left. Screen right. Throw one as far as you can. Vick can not make any throws anymore. Landry can make all of them. He doesn't always make them but he has the ability too make them It is laughable if you think Vick gives us the same chance to win as does Landry. Laughable.
Your hate of Vick must be clouding your Brain. I've already said they both suck. Just because Landry knows the offense means **** if he can't execute it. He is a turnover machine. Playing conservative with Vick sucks too buts its an option because Landry can throw the game away in the first quarter. Bottom line like I said we need Ben because they both suck..they just suck differently. Pick your poison..
I think you need to look into Vick's history of turning the ball over and then re-write your post.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2014
- Messages
- 6,113
- Reaction score
- 9,573
- Points
- 113
8 pages in and no mention of the instant FG leaving the Bungles a chance for a miracle at the end. Pacman already had a couple decent returns and I wouldn't put it past the refs to throw a make up flag on the return and give them a chance to kick a game winner. Glad it didn't come back to bite us as that was just the type of ugly game where that stuff happens.
Otherwise Tomlin was decent, but Porter may have been a bigger contributor.
I root for Stiller wins no matter who coaches us, but to say someone is not backing the team because they are critical of the coach's short comings is absurd.
Otherwise Tomlin was decent, but Porter may have been a bigger contributor.
I root for Stiller wins no matter who coaches us, but to say someone is not backing the team because they are critical of the coach's short comings is absurd.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,953
- Reaction score
- 1,197
- Points
- 113
Generally it is, but when somebody actually says they will take 0-16 to get rid of him that particular poster is done for me. I live in Michigan and got to see Lions fans go through that embarrassing ****. It's a joke. We won the game, and Tomlin had a couple of his usual moments. Under no circumstance do I ever want to lose any game to fire a coach.
I was thinking the same thing. Then you realize, we were out of time outs. If we have a bad snap, we still had time to fall on it and and kill the clock for a 3rd down kick with about 5sec left. Also the bungles fumbled on their last drive. No point to tempt fate with 2 new backs, right?
Running a play with no TOs could have been risky, so we went for the win immediately, and got it!
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2014
- Messages
- 6,113
- Reaction score
- 9,573
- Points
- 113
Anyone who roots for losses over team success to fulfill their own wants is entirely missing the point. To root for 0-16 should equal a ban from board and a relocation to CIN, CLE or BAL
Once again they both suck. But only one wasn't a turnover machine THIS YEAR. I have faith in neither. But you can't have turnovers