The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
This is where we're at, sums it up perfectly.
It perfectly sums up the distorted lefty version of media-created "reality".
Thanks for the laughs.
More proof that the Dimocraps are lying swamp dwellers. Anyone who supports this bullshit peach fortify is dumb as a rock.
Stunning Tweets Of Whistleblower’s Attorney In 2017 Talking About Start Of ‘Coup,’ ‘Impeachment Will Follow’
Posted at 10:30 pm on November 6, 2019 by Nick Arama
The Democrats would like you to believe that this whole Ukraine call impeachment push was just some poor upset whistleblower, so disturbed by what he thought happened on the Trump/Zelensky call, he just had to tell someone.
Except since the news of the whistleblower has come out we’ve found out how untrue that is, that there are many disturbing “coincidences” about this whole episode.
Now there’s more after someone took a deep dive into the tweets of whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid. And they’re beyond troubling.
From Fox News:
Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the intelligence community whistleblower at the center of the Democrats’ ongoing impeachment inquiry, tweeted conspicuously in January 2017 that a “coup has started” and that “impeachment will follow ultimately.”
Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, “I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.” Also that month, Zaid tweeted, “We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters.”
Amid a slew of impeachment-related posts, Zaid assured his Twitter followers that “as one falls, two more will take their place,” apparently referring to Trump administration employees who defy the White House. Zaid promised that the “coup” would occur in “many steps.”
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers https://t.co/FiNBQo6v0S
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) January 31, 2017
Wow. Just after Trump is sworn in.
It's very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to.
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) July 2, 2017
#coup has started. As one falls, two more will take their place. #rebellion #impeachment
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) January 31, 2017
And Zaid had even put out something of a casting call for whistleblowers to take out Trump on Twitter as Trump took office, writing that CIA employees should “come to” his law firm “to lawfully challenge” the new president, according to Fox.
Yikes.
So we’re talking about a whistleblower who we’ve already learned was biased with connections to Joe Biden, John Brennan and even the Russia collusion hoax, who didn’t reveal the contacts he’d had with Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and now who is backed by an attorney who talks about taking Trump out and the “coup.”
No problem there, right, Democrats? This is all just a coincidence?
How about another coincidence? When did Special Counsel Robert Mueller testify and put a stake in any possibility to get President Donald Trump through that method?
July 24. What a coincidence that suddenly after that flames out, a new cause suddenly appeared, courtesy of the whistleblower and the phone call on July 25. Interestingly, the memo the whistleblower wrote about the call on July 26, didn’t mention any quid pro quo claim, according to reports. But after meeting with Rep. Adam Schiff’s aide, the whistleblower was directed to complain to the ICIG and suddenly the quid pro quo claim appeared in the complaint that was filed on August 12. Just another coincidence.
“The whistleblower’s lawyer gave away the game,” the Trump campaign’s communications director, Tim Murtaugh. told Fox News. “It was always the Democrats’ plan to stage a coup and impeach President Trump and all they ever needed was the right scheme. They whiffed on Mueller so now they’ve settled on the perfectly fine Ukraine phone call. This proves this was orchestrated from the beginning.”
Stunning Tweets Of Whistleblower’s Attorney In 2017 Talking About Start Of ‘Coup,’ ‘Impeachment Will Follow’
Posted at 10:30 pm on November 6, 2019 by Nick Arama
The Democrats would like you to believe that this whole Ukraine call impeachment push was just some poor upset whistleblower, so disturbed by what he thought happened on the Trump/Zelensky call, he just had to tell someone.
Except since the news of the whistleblower has come out we’ve found out how untrue that is, that there are many disturbing “coincidences” about this whole episode.
Now there’s more after someone took a deep dive into the tweets of whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid. And they’re beyond troubling.
From Fox News:
Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the intelligence community whistleblower at the center of the Democrats’ ongoing impeachment inquiry, tweeted conspicuously in January 2017 that a “coup has started” and that “impeachment will follow ultimately.”
Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, “I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president.” Also that month, Zaid tweeted, “We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters.”
Amid a slew of impeachment-related posts, Zaid assured his Twitter followers that “as one falls, two more will take their place,” apparently referring to Trump administration employees who defy the White House. Zaid promised that the “coup” would occur in “many steps.”
#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers https://t.co/FiNBQo6v0S
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) January 31, 2017
Wow. Just after Trump is sworn in.
It's very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to.
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) July 2, 2017
#coup has started. As one falls, two more will take their place. #rebellion #impeachment
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) January 31, 2017
And Zaid had even put out something of a casting call for whistleblowers to take out Trump on Twitter as Trump took office, writing that CIA employees should “come to” his law firm “to lawfully challenge” the new president, according to Fox.
Yikes.
So we’re talking about a whistleblower who we’ve already learned was biased with connections to Joe Biden, John Brennan and even the Russia collusion hoax, who didn’t reveal the contacts he’d had with Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and now who is backed by an attorney who talks about taking Trump out and the “coup.”
No problem there, right, Democrats? This is all just a coincidence?
How about another coincidence? When did Special Counsel Robert Mueller testify and put a stake in any possibility to get President Donald Trump through that method?
July 24. What a coincidence that suddenly after that flames out, a new cause suddenly appeared, courtesy of the whistleblower and the phone call on July 25. Interestingly, the memo the whistleblower wrote about the call on July 26, didn’t mention any quid pro quo claim, according to reports. But after meeting with Rep. Adam Schiff’s aide, the whistleblower was directed to complain to the ICIG and suddenly the quid pro quo claim appeared in the complaint that was filed on August 12. Just another coincidence.
“The whistleblower’s lawyer gave away the game,” the Trump campaign’s communications director, Tim Murtaugh. told Fox News. “It was always the Democrats’ plan to stage a coup and impeach President Trump and all they ever needed was the right scheme. They whiffed on Mueller so now they’ve settled on the perfectly fine Ukraine phone call. This proves this was orchestrated from the beginning.”
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
From that camera angle she's at 3:00, Brunette in the maroon shirt. I paused the TV and verified nipples. It's true.
I don't know about this, can he be that dumb?
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
This is where we're at, sums it up perfectly.
How much do want bet that Tibs never read the transcript?
Are you sure you know how a clock works?
Different angles. Look how far the nerd with the bow tie moved between the two pics. Bottom line is she showed her nips to the world. And they were nice.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
You get the government you deserve
Virginia Gov says he will reintroduce gun control measures after Dems take over state government
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam said he will reintroduce gun control measures in the upcoming legislative sessions now that Democrats have taken control of the state legislature.
"Getting rid of bump stocks, high volume magazines, red flag laws. These are common-sense pieces of legislation," he told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I will introduce those again in January. And I'm convinced, with the majority now in the House and the Senate, they'll become law and because of that, Virginia will be safer."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/v...er-dems-take-over-state-government/ar-AAJX2CB
Virginia Gov says he will reintroduce gun control measures after Dems take over state government
Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam said he will reintroduce gun control measures in the upcoming legislative sessions now that Democrats have taken control of the state legislature.
"Getting rid of bump stocks, high volume magazines, red flag laws. These are common-sense pieces of legislation," he told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I will introduce those again in January. And I'm convinced, with the majority now in the House and the Senate, they'll become law and because of that, Virginia will be safer."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/v...er-dems-take-over-state-government/ar-AAJX2CB
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
KABOOM!
Do it Do it Do it!
Pelosi and her son too, drag them all into court under oath.
Dems Warn Against Calling Bidens to Testify: It ‘Would Be Rolling a Grenade Down The Senate'
Senate Democrats issued stark warnings that Republicans would severely damage the institution of Congress if they acquiesced to a push from Trump allies to haul former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter for testimony about their actions in Ukraine.
A top Biden ally, Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE), told The Daily Beast that calling the 2020 presidential contender—who served for 35 years in the Senate—and his son for testimony “would be literally rolling a grenade down the aisle of the Senate” that would have “lasting consequences” on the upper chamber’s ability to work together.
The idea of bringing in the Bidens to testify has gained traction in recent days as allies of President Donald Trump have flirted with counter-programming the impeachment proceedings in the House by having the GOP-led Senate call witnesses of their own.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...fy-democrats-warn-it-would-blow-up-the-senate
Do it Do it Do it!
Pelosi and her son too, drag them all into court under oath.
Dems Warn Against Calling Bidens to Testify: It ‘Would Be Rolling a Grenade Down The Senate'
Senate Democrats issued stark warnings that Republicans would severely damage the institution of Congress if they acquiesced to a push from Trump allies to haul former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter for testimony about their actions in Ukraine.
A top Biden ally, Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE), told The Daily Beast that calling the 2020 presidential contender—who served for 35 years in the Senate—and his son for testimony “would be literally rolling a grenade down the aisle of the Senate” that would have “lasting consequences” on the upper chamber’s ability to work together.
The idea of bringing in the Bidens to testify has gained traction in recent days as allies of President Donald Trump have flirted with counter-programming the impeachment proceedings in the House by having the GOP-led Senate call witnesses of their own.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...fy-democrats-warn-it-would-blow-up-the-senate
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,311
- Reaction score
- 19,435
- Points
- 113
Why would it be so awful? Because the curtain gets pulled back a little further? I mean, is Joe Biden and his son above reproach? They shouldn't have to answer questions about that shady Ukrainian bullshit they pulled? Yeah, I agree. Do it. There are a lot of people in both chambers that need exposed for the frauds that they are.
That's a huge step in draining the swamp. Do it!
Pause the video at 42 - 43 seconds. It was a lot more apparent on the feed that I watched on my iPad. Lighting, angles and such. Plus her hair was in the way a lot. It's important to enjoy the little things in life...
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,311
- Reaction score
- 19,435
- Points
- 113
I don’t get it. It would be a disaster and have lasting consequences to question Joe Biden and his son about something Joe Biden admitted on videotape, but three years worth of investigations into the President searching for some sort of impeachable misdeed or crime with no evidence or charges is upholding democracy. GTFOH.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,572
- Reaction score
- 6,248
- Points
- 113
You don't get out a lot, do you Indy?
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,572
- Reaction score
- 6,248
- Points
- 113
I can guarantee you I watch more live congressional hearings & press briefings, and read more transcripts, including this one (as well as the entire Mueller report), than this entire board combined. I don't say that to brag, just stating as fact. I'm a bit odd in that way, that I pay attention and research political matters to the extent that I do, since I'm not a journalist, a political analyst or a historian. But I do get a kick out of it, I do it as a hobby, I guess. As an example, I'm currently sitting here watching the Pentagon's live briefing on Syria. Needless to say, my wife thinks I'm a nerd, and she's mostly right about that.
More than I should, actually.
I can guarantee you I watch more live congressional hearings & press briefings, and read more transcripts, including this one (as well as the entire Mueller report), than this entire board combined. I don't say that to brag, just stating as fact. I'm a bit odd in that way, that I pay attention and research political matters to the extent that I do, since I'm not a journalist, a political analyst or a historian. But I do get a kick out of it, I do it as a hobby, I guess. As an example, I'm currently sitting here watching the Pentagon's live briefing on Syria. Needless to say, my wife thinks I'm a nerd, and she's mostly right about that.
Good for you, but you can't state that as fact when you have no idea how much other people do research or watch live streams of congressional hearings. Perhaps a more accurate statement would be, "yes, I have read the transcript, and I watch a lot of live congressional hearings, it's a hobby of mine." I respect your opinions even though I don't agree with most of them, I still respect your right to opine. But don't come in here acting like Coach the know it all. Be intellectually honest, not a D blowhard.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,572
- Reaction score
- 6,248
- Points
- 113
You're right, I should have stated that differently. It may very well be many posters on this board spend hours a day watching live streams of congressional hearings and pouring over transcripts. I have no way of knowing that. I didn't mean to come across as a pompous ***, sorry about that.
Its all good. I just think that sometimes we forget that we all want what is best for the Republic, we just have different ideas on how that looks.