• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Epstein Problem

Ron Burgundy said:
Hmmm…..
Okay, so Whoopie is saying that just because someone’s name is in the Epstein Files, that doesn’t mean they did anything wrong.
Interesting take….
Click to expand...

But according to Trogs tremendous meme (#2364) Trump should be mad at Whoopie.
 
Hypocycloids said:
It’s not strange.
Trump did call the police, and according to what I’ve read he didn’t tell the truth in 2019.

Wouldn’t you lie if you had to endure 4 years of bogus demonrat schemes to try and take him down?
I could just imagine the mind numbing rhetoric coming from you people had he said he knew all about Epsteins sex business.
Click to expand...
JFC! No!

I would say “Yes, in fact, I notified the police.”

You’re doing metal gymnastics to make Trumps behavior and statements consistent with someone who’s not guilty.
 
Superman said:
was there an active investigation ongoing when Trump said that? Can you provide the time/date when that statement was made?




There's more in the link you won't click, but the Executive Summary is there.
Click to expand...
July 12, 2019. Before he told everyone to forget about the Epstein files or declared them a Democrat hoax. Somehow this all makes sense to you.

 
Politicians on both sides of the aisle have seen the unredacted files. The victims lived though it. There's a lot of people that know the truth. Yet not a single person has come forward and named a single name. Prince Andrew and that agent are the only people to be punished and the agent's punishment is coming from association, not pedophilia. No one has been punished under the law except Maxwell.

Something stinks with this. I don't know how anyone supports anyone in government. They have the information. But they won't tell you any of it. They won't be honest with you. But you'll run to the polls and vote for them like your life depends on it. They're glad you look at everything as left or right, rich or poor, black or white. It's how things like $9 billion in fraud just don't matter much. This too will disappear the minute they can't use it as a political tool.

Until people realize that your government cares for you only to the extent that you can enrich them, nothing is going to change. There's 330 million people in this country. And we're allowing ourselves to be led around by the nose by 535 of them. Sad.
 
Troglodyte said:
JFC! No!

I would say “Yes, in fact, I notified the police.”

You’re doing metal gymnastics to make Trumps behavior and statements consistent with someone who’s not guilty.
Click to expand...
What your brain fails to process or won’t accept doesn’t constitute mental gymnastics.
It’s TDS, not mental gymnastics you’re having an issue with.
Again.
1. He called the police.
2. He also didn’t tell the truth in 2019 about having known about Epsteins sex endeavors…
…to which I proposed a pretty good possibility as to why.

But that was out of the question for you. Won’t give the suggestion even the slightest consideration, because that’s what TDS does.
 
Troglodyte said:
Strange. Do explain why Trump claimed to have known nothing about Epstein’s crimes in 2019.
Click to expand...
Troglodyte said:
😂 You’re unhinged.

Bill Clinton has demanded to testify to congress publicly. Now, compare and contrast that to Trump.
Click to expand...
You forgot to end these replies with "you're in a cult"
 
Sarge said:
Politicians on both sides of the aisle have seen the unredacted files. The victims lived though it. There's a lot of people that know the truth. Yet not a single person has come forward and named a single name. Prince Andrew and that agent are the only people to be punished and the agent's punishment is coming from association, not pedophilia. No one has been punished under the law except Maxwell.

Something stinks with this. I don't know how anyone supports anyone in government. They have the information. But they won't tell you any of it. They won't be honest with you. But you'll run to the polls and vote for them like your life depends on it. They're glad you look at everything as left or right, rich or poor, black or white. It's how things like $9 billion in fraud just don't matter much. This too will disappear the minute they can't use it as a political tool.

Until people realize that your government cares for you only to the extent that you can enrich them, nothing is going to change. There's 330 million people in this country. And we're allowing ourselves to be led around by the nose by 535 of them. Sad.
Click to expand...

The reasons the victims won’t name names according to AI.
The two that are the most compelling are 1 and 3.

1 is possible because of 3.

One victim received 3 million from the Epstein estate, therefore would suffer great losses if sued. Keep the money and shut up.

1.
Fear of "Lawfare" and Ruin: Victims face the threat of being sued for defamation or breach of contract by wealthy and influential individuals, which could destroy them financially.

2.
Safety and Intimidation: Survivors have reported direct threats to their lives and the safety of their families. One survivor mentioned threats involving her children.

3.
Legal Constraints (NDAs): Many survivors signed strict confidentiality agreements as part of civil settlements with the Epstein estate.

4.
Shifting Responsibility: Victims have expressed that the burden of identifying these individuals should not fall on them, but rather on the Department of Justice (DOJ), which possesses the investigative files.

5.
Distrust of System: Survivors have expressed fear that the same government institutions that allowed the abuse to continue might not protect them if they speak out
 
Troglodyte said:
Should the DOJ interview them? YES or NO.

Click to expand...

Sure they should. It's not going to make a difference because no one in government is ever held to account unless they are universally disliked.
 
Troglodyte said:
July 12, 2019. Before he told everyone to forget about the Epstein files or declared them a Democrat hoax. Somehow this all makes sense to you.

Click to expand...
from your own link, SmoothBrain...

1771436466633.png

as you've screeched that during the Biden Assedupministration, there was an active investigation going on. See the "Context" in YOUR LINK? In fact, even in your very own words (and absolutely not ones you've seen parroted elsewhere) "July 12, 2019". That is when Epstein was arrested. As such, there was an ongoing investigation into Epstein.

So, Smooth Brain, do advise why anyone would say "oh, yeah, I knew about this." when the investigation was going on, the guy had been arrested and was in jail... why would anyone with any semblance of logical thinking (LOL - you just got included in "logical thinking"!?!?!?!?) would jeopardize the investigation by suggesting to the media that they were fully aware of the ongoing activities that caused Epstein to be arrested. Let alone that they had dropped a dime in 2006 to get the ball rolling on this.

Even someone with as marble smooth of a brain as you should be able to understand distancing from the investigation so as to not jeopardize it.

but, here you is be. getting skewled again.

@Tim Steelersfan - your ze just be got akwired knowlij again.

I doubt it - like the other facts we've bestowed upon you previously - will stick though, SmoothBrain
 
Superman said:
from your own link, SmoothBrain...

View attachment 16654

as you've screeched that during the Biden Assedupministration, there was an active investigation going on. See the "Context" in YOUR LINK? In fact, even in your very own words (and absolutely not ones you've seen parroted elsewhere) "July 12, 2019". That is when Epstein was arrested. As such, there was an ongoing investigation into Epstein.

So, Smooth Brain, do advise why anyone would say "oh, yeah, I knew about this." when the investigation was going on, the guy had been arrested and was in jail... why would anyone with any semblance of logical thinking (LOL - you just got included in "logical thinking"!?!?!?!?) would jeopardize the investigation by suggesting to the media that they were fully aware of the ongoing activities that caused Epstein to be arrested. Let alone that they had dropped a dime in 2006 to get the ball rolling on this.

Even someone with as marble smooth of a brain as you should be able to understand distancing from the investigation so as to not jeopardize it.

but, here you is be. getting skewled again.

@Tim Steelersfan - your ze just be got akwired knowlij again.

I doubt it - like the other facts we've bestowed upon you previously - will stick though, SmoothBrain
Click to expand...
😂 Jeaporodize the investigation via statement of fact? WTF??? HTF???

Do show where law enforcement encourages people to lie so as to not jeopardize an investigation.

Of all the stupid ******* ****! 😂
 
Last edited:
Troglodyte said:
😂 Jeaporodize the investigation via statement of fact? WTF??? HTF???

Do show where law enforcement encourages people to lie so as to not jeopardize an investigation.

Of all the stupid ******* ****! 😂
Click to expand...
even you arent this stupi... well, yes. yes, you are.

Hypothetical Situations:
Trump tells the media "Yes, I called the sheriff on Epstein back in the day"
Media: why didnt you do more?

Trump: "I dropped a dime"'
Media: So you're a snitch

Trump: "I alerted the authorities. Which is the proper path to take."
Media: Which other pedos do you have in your inner circle?
 
Superman said:
even you arent this stupi... well, yes. yes, you are.

Hypothetical Situations:
Trump tells the media "Yes, I called the sheriff on Epstein back in the day"
Media: why didnt you do more?

Trump: "I dropped a dime"'
Media: So you're a snitch

Trump: "I alerted the authorities. Which is the proper path to take."
Media: Which other pedos do you have in your inner circle?
Click to expand...
Jeopardizes the investigation how?

I suppose Trump was also advised by the police to deny the existence of the files and claim they were a hoax?
 
The Dems TDS really blinds them more often than not..

Look, Trump is clearly defending someone in those files... he ran in those circles.. friends and business acquaintances are in there for sure.. but had he done something untoward himself it would have been plastered everywhere in 2016 and 2020

Remember, he was accused of Epstein related stuff before the one election, and it was found to be utter fantasy... the lame mental gymnastics about not being able to legally release stuff falls short of credible when the Dems leaked boatloads of such stuff trying to sink him the last decade...

They just have to face the reality that all his dirty laundry already got aired out and people just didnt give a ****... there isnt some new bombshell...

Its like the Republicans and Clinton... you got to just move on or it buries you
 
A sobering view from halfway around the world:

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top