The Epstein Problem

[Djfan]

C’mon man, I have standards. She looks like she kissed a puffer fish and puts her makeup on with a putty knife.

Yeah. I can't stand that over produced look for the ladies. Mrs. Fan rocks the girl-next-door look, with jeans, jerseys, boots, etc. Supe sexy.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

Lol why were you super quiet for 5+years on the heinous subject?

Rhetorical question?

 

[Superman]

Supe sexy.

thank you.

 

[Steelr4evr]

 

[Troglodyte]

 

[Superman]

mm hmm.
go back a few pages and read forward. i've not the inclination to repeat anything.

 

[Sarge]

Saw on the news this morning that at least 16 files have suddenly disappeared from the website. Why? I mean, this **** is getting ridiculous. First, they don’t release what they’re supposed to, then what they do release is ridiculously redacted, then photos start disappearing and now files are disappearing.

It’s looking to me like Trump is trying to protect himself, someone else or both. Bondi needs to go. She has screwed this up from the word go, among a litany of other things. Whether she’s incompetent or following orders, it’s dereliction regardless and she’s clearly out of her depth. Goodness, none of this is difficult.

 

[Hypocycloids]

Saw on the news this morning that at least 16 files have suddenly disappeared from the website. Why? I mean, this **** is getting ridiculous. First, they don’t release what they’re supposed to, then what they do release is ridiculously redacted, then photos start disappearing and now files are disappearing.

It’s looking to me like Trump is trying to protect himself, someone else or both. Bondi needs to go. She has screwed this up from the word go, among a litany of other things. Whether she’s incompetent or following orders, it’s dereliction regardless and she’s clearly out of her depth. Goodness, none of this is difficult.

What appears on the surface is not what’s going on.
People need to watch this in its entirety before piling on with their accusations and theories.

 

[Badcat]

What appears on the surface is not what’s going on.
People need to watch this in its entirety before piling on with their accusations and theories.

I call bullshit on this. Sorry. It's just way too convenient. "We're protecting "Victims"" NO, you're protecting predators who have influence and you corrupt ******'s don't want to commit Clintoncide.

 

[Superman]

I call bullshit on this. Sorry. It's just way too convenient. "We're protecting "Victims"" NO, you're protecting predators who have influence and you corrupt ******'s don't want to commit Clintoncide.

it could be a mixture. there's also the possibility that there was **** going on there that we are not aware of that hasn't come out publicly. yes, the sexual assaults and pedophilia happened and that isnt being denied.

 

[Djfan]

Yeah. I can't stand that over produced look for the ladies. Mrs. Fan rocks the girl-next-door look, with jeans, jerseys, boots, etc. Supe sexy.

Of all the crappy typos.

I'm not having a good day right now.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

So the victims are grateful that the DOJ is heavily redacting the files or is that the world according to Tim?

https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-victims-outrage-over-cover-up-release-of-incomplete-files-13486256

From your Left wing source: "...Several victims of Jeffrey Epstein..."

In Floggyspeak, that means everyone.

I'm warning you up front, this is going to cost you another $19.95. Now back to the world of reality and what the **** is actually going on.

The files were released due to a Congressional ACT:

"Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) in November 2025, a bipartisan bill requiring the Attorney General to release all Department of Justice documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, compelling the release of sealed records and forcing compliance after previous delays, leading to significant document dumps in late 2025."

From the Act (see the little linky above)

(c) Permitted Withholdings.—(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that—(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

Your "several" are Trumped (pun definitely intended) by the majority:

Judge seeks to shield Epstein victims after dozens of names exposed in documents release​

Law firm representing alleged Epstein victims sends scathing letter over DOJ document releas​

When the House Oversight Committee released a trove of files and emails from the Epstein estate earlier this month, alleged victims of the convicted sex offender responded with "widespread panic" after learning the documents included dozens of unredacted victim names, prominent attorneys for Epstein victims told a federal judge this week.

"I thought the government had promised to redact our names and identifying material. I don't understand how this is happening again," one alleged victim told attorneys Bradley Edwards and Brittany Henderson, with the Edwards Henderson law firm

Summary: most did not want their personal identities revealed to the public. Instead, many survivors supported greater transparency in the Epstein files overall (to expose wrongdoing and hold perpetrators accountable), but they also expressly opposed the public release of personally identifying information about themselves.

Victims and their lawyers pushed for redactions of names and identifying details. After an early release of some documents showed dozens of victim names unredacted, lawyers for hundreds of Epstein’s survivors sent a letter urging the Justice Department to redact all victims’ names in future releases and to withhold any material that could identify the victims. They emphasized that victims did not want their identities exposed publicly and argued that releasing such details could endanger or retraumatize them. They noted some survivors were approached by reporters after their names appeared unredacted. Some individual survivors also wrote to judges seeking protection of their identities.

---

Still waiting on an answer: Do you want the victims exposed, so as to face potential suiciding? Or is getting DJT so important to you that you are ok with gambling that this "might" be the hook that lands him and any of these victims suffering irreparable harm is ok?

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/why-were-epstein-files-not-released-biden/

A gentle reminder that you absolutely suck at this. Read what you link to before posty posty.

“They had an open grand jury. … And even after Maxwell’s conviction, the case was on appeal — anyone in law enforcement knows you don’t open your case file when it’s still under appeal,” Brown added.

Victims were still going to the FBI with information during Biden’s term, but that changed when President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice reviewed the files and closed the case in July, Brown said.

Biden's DOJ sat on it....could have closed it as well. Why not?

 

[jitter77]

Saw on the news this morning that at least 16 files have suddenly disappeared from the website. Why? I mean, this **** is getting ridiculous. First, they don’t release what they’re supposed to, then what they do release is ridiculously redacted, then photos start disappearing and now files are disappearing.

It’s looking to me like Trump is trying to protect himself, someone else or both. Bondi needs to go. She has screwed this up from the word go, among a litany of other things. Whether she’s incompetent or following orders, it’s dereliction regardless and she’s clearly out of her depth. Goodness, none of this is difficult.

To make it dumber some of the stuff taken down was put back up. The whole thing is a clown show. What is the point of releasing documents with every page fully blacked out. That goes way beyond protecting victims. There should have been unfiltered bi-patisian access to the files for years

 

[Troglodyte]

From your Left wing source: "...Several victims of Jeffrey Epstein..."

In Floggyspeak, that means everyone.

I'm warning you up front, this is going to cost you another $19.95. Now back to the world of reality and what the **** is actually going on.

The files were released due to a Congressional ACT:

"Congress passed theEpstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) in November 2025, a bipartisan bill requiring the Attorney General to release all Department of Justice documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, compelling the release of sealed records and forcing compliance after previous delays, leading to significant document dumps in late 2025."

From the Act (see the little linky above)



Your "several" are Trumped (pun definitely intended) by the majority:

Judge seeks to shield Epstein victims after dozens of names exposed in documents release​

Law firm representing alleged Epstein victims sends scathing letter over DOJ document releas​

Summary: most did not want their personal identities revealed to the public. Instead, many survivors supported greater transparency in the Epstein files overall (to expose wrongdoing and hold perpetrators accountable), but they also expressly opposed the public release of personally identifying information about themselves.

Victims and their lawyers pushed for redactions of names and identifying details. After an early release of some documents showed dozens of victim names unredacted, lawyers for hundreds of Epstein’s survivors sent a letter urging the Justice Department to redact all victims’ names in future releases and to withhold any material that could identify the victims. They emphasized that victims did not want their identities exposed publicly and argued that releasing such details could endanger or retraumatize them. They noted some survivors were approached by reporters after their names appeared unredacted. Some individual survivors also wrote to judges seeking protection of their identities.

---

Still waiting on an answer: Do you want the victims exposed, so as to face potential suiciding? Or is getting DJT so important to you that you are ok with gambling that this "might" be the hook that lands him and any of these victims suffering irreparable harm is ok?

So you’re disregarding the victims that want more transparency.

Do you want the perps exposed? Does Bondi? Does Blanche? You act as if Trump and the administration hasn’t acted extremely suspicious.

 

[Troglodyte]

A gentle reminder that you absolutely suck at this. Read what you link to before posty posty.



Biden's DOJ sat on it....could have closed it as well. Why not?

I suck at this? You neglected to highlight the part about victims still going to the FBI with information during Biden’s term.