I have to say, I actually enjoyed Romo's commentary during the game

[Skott]

HES a better commmetator then he was QB

And

 

[Blitzburgh]

His insight is really good, I just don't like his voice.

Well yeah better than Beth Mowins.

 

[Shane Falco]

Did anybody catch his Dumb and Dumber reference when they goofed on that one dude's name haha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4ev-BtPMM8

Yes...my wife had no idea why I was laughing

 

[Shane Falco]

I also like Romo. Simms was fine with me, he just dumbed down his terminology. Romo did a better job at explaining defensive strategy and offensive strategy that a casual fan or non fan could follow.

 

[Stryker]

#1 He's entertaining
#2 He's well informed and has a vast knowledge of the game, packages, sub packages, and trends out of them.
#3 He can read a Defense
#4 He's great at explaining complex schemes, to make them understandable for laymen.
#5 I don't want to turn the sound on mute when he's on.

If I'm learning something listening to him, he's worth listening to.

 

[Spike]

then there's the Sunday Night crew


THE GIANTS ARE COMING OFF A WORSE WEEK THAN HARVEY WEINSTEIN, har har - Al Michaels, contemporary social commentator.

https://twitter.com/JordanHeckFF

 

[MTC]

#1 He's entertaining
#2 He's well informed and has a vast knowledge of the game, packages, sub packages, and trends out of them.
#3 He can read a Defense
#4 He's great at explaining complex schemes, to make them understandable for laymen.
#5 I don't want to turn the sound on mute when he's on.

If I'm learning something listening to him, he's worth listening to.

Yeah. Romo is very decent. I enjoy his commentary too.

 

[MTC]

He knows his stuff. A smart guy. You have to wonder why he made so many mistakes as a player though...he's not a dolt.

To be fair, as a commentator he gets to break down things and sees the entire scheme, etc.
As a player, I'm sure he understood the schemes, just when you're down there in the action, easier said than done