you're such a contradictory idiotNo, trying to cancel votes is the ultimate attempt to silence people.
And Young didn’t demand Spotify silence Rogan, he gave them a choice.
you're such a contradictory idiotNo, trying to cancel votes is the ultimate attempt to silence people.
And Young didn’t demand Spotify silence Rogan, he gave them a choice.
Well I hope Neil Young will remember….You are a corrupt liar. That much is clear. But more and more, you present evidence that you are simply stupid. Illegal votes are the veritable definition of stealing votes. I presented direct evidence in the form of a court ruling showing massive voter fraud in the form of illegal ballot boxes and illegal ballots - repeat, ILLEGAL ballots. Every void, illegal, manipulated or fake ballot counted in Wisconsin as a result of the ILLEGAL ballots canceled out an actual American vote.
Idiot.
You.
Stupid.
*******.
Idiot.
Neil Young:
So that's NOT a demand that Spotify silence Rogan?
Sure. Right. Guy points a gun at another person's face. "You can give me your wallet or I put a bullet into your face."
Floggy the wanna-be lawyer: "He didn't rob him. He gave him a choice."
Dumbass.
50 lawsuits DISMISSED.
A lawyer should be able to understand that “Spotify CAN HAVE Joe Rogan” most certainly is NOT a demand that they silence him.
Yep. Throughout American history judges have generally tried to avoid getting involved in political questions, including litigation about elections.You stupid bag of donkey ****, I posted an actual decision on the merits by the Wisconsin court that the "drop boxes" resulting in thousands of unvetted ballots were ILLEGAL. In other words, you cockroach, those thousands upon thousands of votes WERE ILLEGAL, MEANING AGAINST THE LAW, MEANING CAST IN VIOLATION OF GOVERNING WISCONSIN LAW.
You are so vapid, so dumb, such a brainless gerbil that you repeat some claim - one you never actually checked - by some anonymous left-wing buttplug claiming that courts dismissed "50 lawsuits" on the merits.
For the THIRD ******* TIME, NOT. TRUE.
Courts are always unwilling to get involved in election battles on separation of powers grounds. The courts you falsely claimed dismissed cases "on the merits" actually dismissed them for standing, or timeliness, or jurisdictional reasons, or any number of other tricks by the court to avoid ruling on the merits.
You know how a case is decided on the merits, you wanna-be? The court ADMITS EVIDENCE and the judge or jury RULES ON THE EVIDENCE.
So genius, cite on ******* case where any court in America took testimony or documents on the election fraud claims? I mean apart from Wisconsin, where the court ruled thousands upon thousands of ballots were illegal? Go ahead, genius.
******* idiot. I represent all types of people. I have represented some of the biggest companies on earth, and some of the largest governmental organizations in the United States. In my decades as a lawyer, I have found basically one client I cannot stand - an idiot who thinks he knows the law.
Those dumbshits are all the same. They don't know the evidence code, they don't know the law, they don't know what they need to prove to win a case, they don't have a goddamn clue what works or doesn't work, yet they are always certain I should litigate the case "their way." I patiently explain why some irrelevant argument in an elevator three years earlier doesn't matter, nobody cares, it doesn't help our case and this type of client insists that goddamn elevator argument is going to "win the case." In dealing with insufferable know-it-alls like that, I tell them, "You hired me because this is what I do and I know more about how to win this case than anybody you are ever going to meet. I am not going to litigate the case your way, I am going to win it my way. If you don't agree, then fire me and go win the case yourself." Lo and be-*******-hold, they follow my direction and we get paid.
You are the stupid client and obviously the one stupid ************ who would INSIST on going about it your way and losing.
Even a dumbfuck blowhard douchebag wanna-be moron fucknozzle should know that a demand that Spotify "remove me or him" is an attempt to remove Rogan, i.e., silence him.
Hey, if the dunce cap and dildo fit ...
Jesus. That article is chilling. I have so much to say, yet I find myself speechless.**** just got real! Military whistleblowers just stepped up with damning evidence that thevaccineshot IS in fact causing a **** ton of issues amongst our military. **** just pisses me the hell off.
The only thing I would question is the increase in cancer rates. I would think if that was an issue it would be more long term and not instantaneous. But the ICD's for miscarriages and neurological conditions certainly warrant further investigation. If true, scary indeed.Jesus. That article is chilling. I have so much to say, yet I find myself speechless.
If that data is correct and true, there should be a palpable anger nationwide. It seems between this and VAERS, this vaccine is ******* people up. And this data is being dismissed by our government and our media and even ordinary citizens. Why isn't anyone asking questions? Is political protection of the people trying to kill you that important? I have a feeling this is going to get worse. I hope people keep speaking out.
No you tried to make my point as if it were about Trumps actions leading up to the election instead of his attempt to overturn the election results. I’m not conflating anything.You're now conflating issues to try and save your piss poor point.
Young demanded, gave them a choice? You're suggesting that fuckhead is the CEO of Spotify? Good Lord man! LOL
No, I think Young didn’t want to be associated with Spotify if they were going to continue to sponsor Rogan. I’m also quite certain he doesn’t need Spotify’s money.Pretty sure the choice they made isn't what Neil Young was expecting. All of us, including you, know exactly what Young's goal was, and it wasn't to have his own music removed from Spotify.
Argue with the history books, stooge.You stupid bag of donkey ****, I posted an actual decision on the merits by the Wisconsin court that the "drop boxes" resulting in thousands of unvetted ballots were ILLEGAL. In other words, you cockroach, those thousands upon thousands of votes WERE ILLEGAL, MEANING AGAINST THE LAW, MEANING CAST IN VIOLATION OF GOVERNING WISCONSIN LAW.
You are so vapid, so dumb, such a brainless gerbil that you repeat some claim - one you never actually checked - by some anonymous left-wing buttplug claiming that courts dismissed "50 lawsuits" on the merits.
For the THIRD ******* TIME, NOT. TRUE.
Courts are always unwilling to get involved in election battles on separation of powers grounds. The courts you falsely claimed dismissed cases "on the merits" actually dismissed them for standing, or timeliness, or jurisdictional reasons, or any number of other tricks by the court to avoid ruling on the merits.
You know how a case is decided on the merits, you wanna-be? The court ADMITS EVIDENCE and the judge or jury RULES ON THE EVIDENCE.
So genius, cite on ******* case where any court in America took testimony or documents on the election fraud claims? I mean apart from Wisconsin, where the court ruled thousands upon thousands of ballots were illegal? Go ahead, genius.
******* idiot. I represent all types of people. I have represented some of the biggest companies on earth, and some of the largest governmental organizations in the United States. For the past twelve years, I have represented individuals as plaintiffs. I meet a lot of people and in my decades as a lawyer, I have found basically one client I cannot stand - an idiot who thinks he knows the law.
Those dumbshits are all the same. They don't know the evidence code, they don't know the law, they don't know what they need to prove to win a case, they don't have a goddamn clue what works or doesn't work, yet they are always certain I should litigate the case "their way." I patiently explain why some irrelevant argument in an elevator three years earlier doesn't matter, nobody cares, it doesn't help our case and this type of client insists that goddamn elevator argument is going to "win the case." In dealing with insufferable know-it-alls like that, I tell them, "You hired me because this is what I do and I know more about how to win this case than anybody you are ever going to meet. I am not going to litigate the case your way, I am going to win it my way. If you don't agree, then fire me and go win the case yourself." Lo and be-*******-hold, they follow my direction and we get paid.
You are the stupid client and obviously the one stupid ************ who would INSIST on going about it your way and losing.
Even a dumbfuck blowhard douchebag wanna-be moron fucknozzle should know that a demand that Spotify "remove me or him" is an attempt to remove Rogan, i.e., silence him.
Hey, if the dunce cap and dildo fit ...
Well, I'm completely certain Spotify doesn't need Neil young's music. Obviously, and things of that nature.No, I think Young didn’t want to be associated with Spotify if they were going to continue to sponsor Rogan. I’m also quite certain he doesn’t need Spotify’s money.
that response doesnt even make sense.Argue with the history books, stooge.
that response doesnt even make sense.
not even in Dodge City, Kansas.
you cite a modern day action, then when you have your illogical and inane reply turned against you, you decide to **** on history. the very same history that was used to refute your ignorance.
He is now simply tossing off...
And they wonder why the people no longer believe. Lying liars, telling lies, deceiving, and now abusing Americans. What has been done to the children in this country is both criminal and heartbreaking.
Floggy is not even trying at this point. Everything he pledges allegiance to - lockdowns, masks, closing schools, the shot, Biden, open borders - has turned to total and absolute **** and we all know it. He is happily gulping down the **** sandwich but when the 95% of Americans who recognize a **** sandwich refuse to take a bite, he retreats to something so dumb, so vapid as to evidence his utter inability to dispute the point any more.
He may as well start citing random Aramaic or Sansrkit at this point.
**** the covidian vax nazis.
You stupid bag of donkey ****