So many? Of the ones with an abundance of vaccines, isn’t it a few? One reason the UK is doing it is because they can better afford to as their vaccination rate is well ahead of ours.
www.medpagetoday.com
So the vaccine is dangerous to kids without any underlying health conditions, but NOT dangerous for kids WiTH underlying health conditions?Keep banging that drum to do it and ignore data like this from Johns Hopkins. Not one healthy kid has died of COVID. Not one.
Think Twice Before Giving the COVID Vax to Healthy Kids
Based on the data to date, there's no compelling case for it right now
Returning to the discussion of the COVID-19 risk to kids (ages 0 to 12 years) right now, it's worth aggregating the best available data to date. In reviewing the medical literature and news reports, and in talking to pediatricians across the country, I am not aware of a single healthy child in the U.S. who has died of COVID-19 to date. To investigate further, my research team at Johns Hopkins partnered with FAIR health to study pediatric COVID-19 deaths using approximately half of the nation's health insurance data. We found that 100% of pediatric COVID-19 deaths were in children with a pre-existing condition, solidifying the case to vaccinate any child with a comorbidity.
Given that the risk of a healthy child dying is between zero and infinitesimally rare, it's understandable that many parents are appropriately asking, why vaccinate healthy kids at all?
-----------
Yeah, just a few. In Europe alone, 17 countries are not vaccinating kids, 16 are. Just..a...few.
European Countries Evenly Split on COVID Jabs for Teenagers
European countries are almost evenly split on whether to administer coronavirus vaccinations to teenagers as alarm mounts on the continent about a possible fourth wave of infections.www.voanews.com
Sixteen countries, including France and Italy, are now vaccinating children above the age of 12 or plan to do so; while 17 countries have decided against, or will only jab teenagers, if they have serious underlying health conditions.
Another four countries remain undecided.
DId you read a ******* word I wrote or did you skim and assume? Ignore the VAERS data it isn't firm data and I have acknowledged that over and over. You lump me in with Tim, no offense Tim, when I am not arguing the validity of his point just trying to get you to even understand his point.
Yes… it was one of the pre release concerns over the mRna stuff…for pfizer at least they didn’t include all three aspects of tge virus that data showed tgey had to… this probably is leading to the slow antibody response to the variants and the actual transmissibility after vaccination that tge cdc is worried about
I would expect it is because underlying conditions greatly increase your risk from covid. Now I still think it is unnecessary statistically but at least there is some logic to the reasoning.
You have a greater chance of dying from going to this game by far than Covid, good luck. I wouldn't want to smell those fans in this weather.
My daughter’s under 18 friend got Covid last summer and ended up hospitalized with a leaky heart valve. On behalf of her family and others, I extend a “**** your ignorant self and the horse you rode in on!”
You’re comparing chemotherapy to a vaccine and I’M the one who doesn’t understand medicine?
So way less have died after getting the vaccine vs getting Covid, and way more have received the vaccine than got Covid? What’s the problem?
nypost.com
**** the wiz. Provolone