Weak effort. Gas prices are lower than under Biden, inflation is lower than under Biden, the economy is stronger than under Biden and the world is safer with a crippled Iran. Facts.High gas prices, inflation, economic meltdown, a new war.
Weak effort. Gas prices are lower than under Biden, inflation is lower than under Biden, the economy is stronger than under Biden and the world is safer with a crippled Iran. Facts.High gas prices, inflation, economic meltdown, a new war.
so Dems are now the proponents for mass killings of women and children?High gas prices, inflation, economic meltdown, a new war.
Securing the border was her one job and she failed miserably. Absolutely the worst, most pathetic VP in the history of America. Good thing Tampon Tim didnāt get a shot at the title.And let's not forget, if Harris won our southern border would still be wide open.
in fairness, she's never shown the ability to close anything.And let's not forget, if Harris won our southern border would still be wide open.
No. $3.13 < $3.93 and rising.Weak effort. Gas prices are lower than under Biden,
Basically the same and wait for the impact of gas prices to trickle down to consumers.inflation is lower than under Biden,
The Dow is down 2,000 points from a month ago, employers shed 92,000 jobs and unemployment rose to 4.4%.the economy is stronger than under Biden
FIFYand ISRAEL is safer with a crippled Iran. Facts.
She didnāt fail, she was derelict, as so many of our politicians are these days. She did what she was supposed to do based on her political ideology. None of them fail, they simply donāt bother.Securing the border was her one job and she failed miserably.
You get more and more retarded every day. I keep thinking there canāt be anymore room, but Iām wrong.No. $3.13 < $3.93 and rising.
Basically the same and wait for the impact of gas prices to trickle down to consumers.
The Dow is down 2,000 points from a month ago, employers shed 92,000 jobs and unemployment rose to 4.4%.
FIFY
Like how conclusions from published studies are politically motivated and the J&J vaccine wasnāt resumed? Right, because itās delusional.and back to the subject you're trying to distance yourself from.
You have contorted truth itself into a grotesque reflection of your own making, persisting in this charade with the graceless zeal of one unaware of his own intellectual poverty. Each correction offered to you has been met not with reason, but with the obstinate ignorance of someone too small to fathom integrity. Your deceit has ceased to be an act; it has become the sum of you.Like how conclusions from published studies are politically motivated and the J&J vaccine wasnāt resumed? Right, because itās delusional.
it's well proven that you can pay someone to publish what you want them to publish. why this remains lost on you isnt a mystery, as most things are lost on you.Like how conclusions from published studies are politically motivated and the J&J vaccine wasnāt resumed? Right, because itās delusional.
Nah, you ****** up and posted a bunch of nonsense you thought was true only to be proven wrong.You have contorted truth itself into a grotesque reflection of your own making, persisting in this charade with the graceless zeal of one unaware of his own intellectual poverty. Each correction offered to you has been met not with reason, but with the obstinate ignorance of someone too small to fathom integrity. Your deceit has ceased to be an act; it has become the sum of you.
You spread anti-vax social media nonsense but believe youāre not telling others to not get vaccinated. That is lost on you.it's well proven that you can pay someone to publish what you want them to publish. why this remains lost on you isnt a mystery, as most things are lost on you.
what is also proven is that the clot shot did cause and has caused harm. because it was rushed. because it was an mrna vaccine and was new. that is also lost on you. as most things are. just as people here have said they would not take it because it was a new mrna vaccine and hadnt been through the regular vaccine protocols, but were not telling others to NOT take it is also lost on you. again, no mystery. meanwhile, others here took the vaccine initially and have chosen to forego any booster going forward, but are not telling others to NOT take the vaccine. that again, is lost on you. which, again is not a mystery. while you continue to tow the company line that the holy vaccine can never and has never caused harm, there is proven medical evidence - from independent sources - showing otherwise. again, this is lost on you. so, yes, back to the topic.
What?Nah, you ****** up and posted a bunch of nonsense you thought was true only to be proven wrong.
You spread anti-vax social media nonsense but believe youāre not telling others to not get vaccinated. That is lost on you.
You spread vax social media nonsense but believe you're not telling others to follow the advice of these influencers and tik tok-ers. That is lost on you.
Six medical organizations sue HHS for not following scientific process and a federal judge agreed the vaccine panel changes were arbitrary and capricious. This is lost one you.
People sued to get their jobs back, both civilian and military, after refusing the experimental vaccines due to inconclusive data of efficacy and safety. That is lost on you.
You told me to ājust waitā five years ago and Iām still waiting. That is lost on you.
Five years later, we have since found out we were in fact lied to in that the vaccines did NOT/does NOT prevent transmission, and it does NOT give you immunity from. That is lost on you.
Carry on.
**** off.
So would hers.And let's not forget, if Harris won our southern border would still be wide open.
I told my personal experience.You spread anti-vax social media nonsense but believe youāre not telling others to not get vaccinated. That is lost on you.
Six medical organizations sue HHS for not following scientific process and a federal judge agreed the vaccine panel changes were arbitrary and capricious. This is lost one you.
You told me to ājust waitā five years ago and Iām still waiting. That is lost on you.
Carry on.
100% factual.What?
You're not going to hit him with a "strawman"?
I am shooketh.
You're arguing semantics.
He rephrased his original statement so it was 100% factual, and here you are ignoring the fact that he amended his original statement to provide 100% clarity and certainty to the point we all knew he was making, but fell on your obtuse thick incorrigible head.
You are an insincere duplicitous hypocrite of magnanimous proportions.
It's not the potential information and arguments you make on behalf of the points you're trying to make.
It's the manner in which you choose to deliver the information/points and your unwillingness to consider you may be mistaken or, at the very least, don't have ALL the information and data to draw a reasonable and logical conclusion.
You clearly do, sooooooooooooooo it is 100% factual to you.............?100% factual.only if you believe alternative facts.