• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

There are plenty of great priests, unfortunately the celibacy requirement also attracted a lot of men seeking a cover for their abnormal sexual proclivities. That’s a fatal flaw IMO.
The response is also to Fedderone.

Our federal school system is full of people who have sex.
And now with the help of democrats who also have sex are mutilating our children.

Priest are not the problem at all.
They are the closest thing to Jesus that we know.

Don’t let the noise take you away from the truth.
 
Sure you can sidebar me but I am no saint,
and my answers will come from what is written.
You would be better off studying the life of Saints and reading the bible.

That is what I have done and will continue to do the rest of my life.

Brothers and sisters are not optional for a priest, he is born with them.
Following and devoting your life to Jesus is and the reward is great in the kingdom of Heaven.
I'm a firm believer in the words of the bible.
Like you, I am NOT without sin and cast NO stones.
I'm just genuinely curious why people believe what they believe and mean no disrespect.

But a catholic priest wouldn't be able to give up children, which is also cited in your passage from Luke 18.
Matthew 10, notably 5-40, says what I believe you to be advocating in your sentiments.
Not that you denounce/remove those people from your life, but rather those people will turn on you for putting God first above them and that you should not try to placate them and put them above God.
It also doesn't state/infer/remotely hint at anyone being celibate nor foregoing the company of the opposite sex as a commitment to Christ.
Any such thinking would directly contradict God's will and intention of the Adam and Eve story of creation in Genesis. No?
 
Oh geez…Im not going to take you by the hand again.

"If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you said... In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It's like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder".
You stated it. I’m asking a question about your point. Why is 90 people scamming (allegedly) billions of dollars more important than a handful of people scamming billions of dollars?
 
The response is also to Fedderone.

Our federal school system is full of people who have sex.
And now with the help of democrats who also have sex are mutilating our children.

Priest are not the problem at all.
They are the closest thing to Jesus that we know.

Don’t let the noise take you away from the truth.
Turds come in ALL shapes, sizes, colors, occupations, letters, sexes, and titles.
Some are priests. Some are teachers. Some are deacons. Some are football players.
Take your pick. No one group has it locked down for all their own.

It's ridiculous to say ALL priests are pedophiles. No truth to that. Demonstrably false.
It's just as ridiculous, though, to say priest are not the problem at all.
Some priests are problematic. Just like some reverends, or ministers, or whatever other religious officials may be.
But an edict from the roman catholic church saying the pope/cardinals/bishops/priests/nuns/etc. shouldn't have sex, based on nothing but dogmatic law and not found anywhere in scripture, opens the door to some of the depravity that's become more public in the last 50ish years, but probably has been going on since Constantine started the catholic church.
 
TIME magazine.
The Boston Globe.
Wikipedia.
CBS.
Politifact.
FullFact.


View attachment 16024

Your next attempt to deflect and spin will be what?


giphy.gif
😂 Wikipedia is confirming Trump said what he said, Tim.
 
I'm a firm believer in the words of the bible.
Like you, I am NOT without sin and cast NO stones.
I'm just genuinely curious why people believe what they believe and mean no disrespect.

But a catholic priest wouldn't be able to give up children, which is also cited in your passage from Luke 18.
Matthew 10, notably 5-40, says what I believe you to be advocating in your sentiments.
Not that you denounce/remove those people from your life, but rather those people will turn on you for putting God first above them and that you should not try to placate them and put them above God.
It also doesn't state/infer/remotely hint at anyone being celibate nor foregoing the company of the opposite sex as a commitment to Christ.
Any such thinking would directly contradict God's will and intention of the Adam and Eve story of creation in Genesis. No?
Did any of the apostles get married? they are the direct humans of the word of God.
They devoted their lives to changing the world in Jesus name.
And they all where martyred/murdered for that cause accept John. The attempt of martyrdom on his Johns life was stopped by Devine intervention.
And do you know he was the only apostle at the cross when Jesus was crucified?
John went on to wright the book of revelations.

This type of devoting your life to Jesus/God goes back to the apostles.
Priest of the old testament devoted their lives to God.

In one way I believe people of God should multiply as much as possible, we need more good people in this world.
I also believe that priests have devoted their lives to Christ and have much greatness on earth and heaven and unknown power.
They have picked up their cross and devoted their lives to Jesus. There is much reward for that.
 
here's the interview you're repeatedly - and erroneously - referencing.



take note that BOTH Stern and Trump were referring to ... "women"
a term that you can no longer define, but was explicitly defined at the time of the interview.

View attachment 16027


View attachment 16026

As I pointed out, at least FOUR contestants at the TEEN beauty pageant claim Trump went into their locker room.

But never mind that, would you take a step back and look at what you’re trying to argue in Trumps defense? That it was women he perved on in dressing rooms, not teenage girls. Seriously.
 
Sure you can sidebar me but I am no saint,
and my answers will come from what is written.
You would be better off studying the life of Saints and reading the bible.

That is what I have done and will continue to do the rest of my life.

Brothers and sisters are not optional for a priest, he is born with them.
Following and devoting your life to Jesus is and the reward is great in the kingdom of Heaven.
Having studied this from a secular perspective in college. Priests were not expected to be celibate until the Church realized they were becoming fiefdoms where they were setting up churches in a structure where they were being handed down from father to son like a feudal lord. The whole reason for requiring celibacy was to keep the church in control of its land and parishes. It was not biblical I nature but purely a political mechanism and the early Church used it's writing to make it seem canonical. The Roman Catholic Church was as much a political entity as it was a religious one. You can't study ancient and early Western and Eastern European history without mainly looking at the Roman and eventually the Byzantine Empire.
 
What do you mean by that?

Priests received bad press in this thread.

They are not the problem.

Our child abusing politicians are currently and the only thing most people are doing about it is voting against it.

Priests have given up their lives for Jesus/God.

As Jesus stated “there is great reward in life and in heaven for this.”
 
Did any of the apostles get married? they are the direct humans of the word of God.
They devoted their lives to changing the world in Jesus name.
And they all where martyred/murdered for that cause accept John. The attempt of martyrdom on his Johns life was stopped by Devine intervention.
And do you know he was the only apostle at the cross when Jesus was crucified?
John went on to wright the book of revelations.

This type of devoting your life to Jesus/God goes back to the apostles.
Priest of the old testament devoted their lives to God.

In one way I believe people of God should multiply as much as possible, we need more good people in this world.
I also believe that priests have devoted their lives to Christ and have much greatness on earth and heaven and unknown power.
They have picked up their cross and devoted their lives to Jesus. There is much reward for that.
Yes, Peter, whom Jesus chose to build his church upon, and whom denied Jesus three times, was married.
This is cited several times in the bible ( Matthew 8, Luke 4, Mark 1 ) referring to Jesus curing Peter's mother in law.
Philip had 4 daughters, as cited in Acts. Pretty sure Jesus wouldn't condone ******* children.
Also, Corinthians 9 references the apostles having wives.

Yes, I'm fully aware of John the beloved, whom Jesus entrusted to care for his earthly mother Mary.

Also, the priests of the Old Testament were ALL married.
It was required by their own law, to pass down the priesthood from father to son.
They only temporarily abstained from sex, not permanently.
They mainly abstained during times of their duties at the temple.
 
As I pointed out, at least FOUR contestants at the TEEN beauty pageant claim Trump went into their locker room.

But never mind that, would you take a step back and look at what you’re trying to argue in Trumps defense? That it was women he perved on in dressing rooms, not teenage girls. Seriously.
define woman
 
Yes, Peter, whom Jesus chose to build his church upon, and whom denied Jesus three times, was married.
This is cited several times in the bible ( Matthew 8, Luke 4, Mark 1 ) referring to Jesus curing Peter's mother in law.
Philip had 4 daughters, as cited in Acts. Pretty sure Jesus wouldn't condone ******* children.
Also, Corinthians 9 references the apostles having wives.

Yes, I'm fully aware of John the beloved, whom Jesus entrusted to care for his earthly mother Mary.

Also, the priests of the Old Testament were ALL married.
It was required by their own law, to pass down the priesthood from father to son.
They only temporarily abstained from sex, not permanently.
They mainly abstained during times of their duties at the temple.
They where married before they left their lives and carried Christs cross.

That is the priests calling, is after the apostles left their lives and devoted their lives to Christ
 
They where married before they left their lives and carried Christs cross.

That is the priests calling, is after the apostles left their life.
Are you under the impression they all got divorced once they followed Jesus?
Jesus required them to abandon their families permanently, and all the apostles created the first single parents, with their ex-wives raising kids by themselves with no help from the apostles?
That's quite a leap and contradiction in what the church believed then and believes now.
Do you have scriptural entries to back this?
 
Having studied this from a secular perspective in college. Priests were not expected to be celibate until the Church realized they were becoming fiefdoms where they were setting up churches in a structure where they were being handed down from father to son like a feudal lord. The whole reason for requiring celibacy was to keep the church in control of its land and parishes. It was not biblical I nature but purely a political mechanism and the early Church used it's writing to make it seem canonical. The Roman Catholic Church was as much a political entity as it was a religious one. You can't study ancient and early Western and Eastern European history without mainly looking at the Roman and eventually the Byzantine Empire.
And we know what politicians have written.
Look what our current politicians are writing and doing.
 
Are you under the impression they all got divorced once they followed Jesus?
Jesus required them to abandon their families permanently, and all the apostles created the first single parents, with their ex-wives raising kids by themselves with no help from the apostles?
That's quite a leap and contradiction in what the church believed then and believes now.
Do you have scriptural entries to back this?
They died for their cause? Do you think they brought their families with them to do that.
 
Yes, Peter, whom Jesus chose to build his church upon, and whom denied Jesus three times, was married.
This is cited several times in the bible ( Matthew 8, Luke 4, Mark 1 ) referring to Jesus curing Peter's mother in law.
Philip had 4 daughters, as cited in Acts. Pretty sure Jesus wouldn't condone ******* children.
Also, Corinthians 9 references the apostles having wives.

Yes, I'm fully aware of John the beloved, whom Jesus entrusted to care for his earthly mother Mary.

Also, the priests of the Old Testament were ALL married.
It was required by their own law, to pass down the priesthood from father to son.
They only temporarily abstained from sex, not permanently.
They mainly abstained during times of their duties at the temple.
I honestly haven’t given as much thought into holy people’s sex life before as now in this thread.

I think of it as giving up ur life and devoting your time to Jesus/God.
 
They died for their cause? Do you think they brought their families with them to do that.
They can't die with a wife and children? Happens ALL the time, then and now, for religious reasons and natural causes.
Corinthians 9 seems to indicate that the families did travel with the apostles while they spread the good word of God noting a right to marry a believing wife.
 
They can't die with a wife and children? Happens ALL the time, then and now, for religious reasons and natural causes.
Corinthians 9 seems to indicate that the families did travel with the apostles while they spread the good word of God noting a right to marry a believing wife.
I see you have a problem with the churches beliefs in a priests devotion to Christ that goes back thousands of years.

They are closer to God by our beliefs even though your beliefs differ.
I believe that to be the case.

You do not.
 
And we know what politicians have written.
Look what our current politicians are writing and doing.
And many of the Church's leaders were and are politicians more than true clergy. The early organized Church was created by the Roman Empire as means to keep political control of a populous. That is why Christmas is when it is and many of the Easter traditions borrow from non-Christian Roman festivals and have absolutely nothing to do with actual Christianity. What was and wasn't included in the Bible itself when it was canonized was as much a debate about politics as it was faith. Why this book and not that book? I am a Christian but from having studied more and more on the formation and reformation of the Church I am not very satisfied with what organized religion does to the faith.

This could be its own thread as we have gone quite the tangent here. Good Job Trog in getting us off topic.
 
And many of the Church's leaders were and are politicians more than true clergy. The early organized Church was created by the Roman Empire as means to keep political control of a populous. That is why Christmas is when it is and many of the Easter traditions borrow from non-Christian Roman festivals and have absolutely nothing to do with actual Christianity. What was and wasn't included in the Bible itself when it was canonized was as much a debate about politics as it was faith. Why this book and not that book? I am a Christian but from having studied more and more on the formation and reformation of the Church I am not very satisfied with what organized religion does to the faith.

This could be its own thread as we have gone quite the tangent here. Good Job Trog in getting us off topic.

Organized Christian religion was in hiding and persecuted for centuries from the politicians that helped write the books.
 
Last edited:
I see you have a problem with the churches beliefs in a priests devotion to Christ that goes back thousands of years.

They are closer to God by our beliefs even though your beliefs differ.
I believe that to be the case.

You do not.
Celibacy wasn't brought into the picture as a formal Church construct until 304 AD and even then it wasn't a mandate. Not being allowed to marry and absolutely requiring celibacy wasn't completely formalized until as late as 1139 AD it was started with Pope Gregory VII in the 11th century.
 
Last edited:
Celibacy wasn't brought into the picture as a formal Church construct until 304 AD and even then it wasn't a mandate. Not being allowed to marry and absolutely requiring celibacy wasn't completely formalized until as late as 1139 AD as started with Pope Gregory VII in the 11th century.
It doesn’t matter to me as to when.

Doctors of the church have studied this and everything else for hundreds of years.

It the church and priest believe this devotion to be true to Christ and Christ’s words.
So do I.
 
Organized religion was in hiding and persecuted for centuries from the politicians that helped write the books.
Yes about 300+ years then what had been at odds with the Empire was co-opted by Constantine and became the official Religion of the Empire. Eventually this led to a schism between the Eastern and Western branches and saw the formation of the Eastern Orthodox church. There have been many schisms along the way some politically and some religious such as the fight over the divinity of Christ.
 
Yes about 300+ years then what had been at odds with the Empire was co-opted by Constantine and became the official Religion of the Empire. Eventually this led to a schism between the Eastern and Western branches and saw the formation of the Eastern Orthodox church. There have been many schisms along the way some politically and some religious such as the fight over the divinity of Christ.
Yes and a lot of the doctors of the church have studied this for hundreds of years.

My trust is with their interpretation of our God and how they decided to handle the churches future.
 
Top