- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,394
- Reaction score
- 6,217
- Points
- 113
I wouldn’t complain Fant is a weapon, we use 2 TE sets a lot. We have no back up currently at TE that’s a problem considering Past injuries. Fant kills 2 birds with one pick. His receiver skills are the best at his position in the draft. His 6’4” 250 frame adds to the red zone threats. His 4.46 40 makes it hard for LB to cover him esp if McDonald is also in the field. Can can even lineup in the slot.
I do not see the logic is choosing Fant over Baker. Baker is a Day 1 starter at DB and, as I've said it over and over, he's more reliable than Greedy Williams and Murphy takes too many chances for me to feel comfortable with him...
If the Devin's are gone and we don't go w/ a DB - I want Lawrence (NT, Clemson) as Plan C...
Because i no longer trust them to draft a day 1 starter at CB?
Didnt Lawrence have some off the field issues?
If Fant is best player available at 20 I’m drafting him. No more reaching just to fill a need like we did with Burns, Uncle Jarvis and Edmunds who we could have had in the third.
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
I doubt we take a ILB or CB since we signed FA to fill in those spots. Why would we sign Barron to be a 3 down ILB then draft a rookie for the same roll? I might be going out on a limb but I believe we will not draft a CB or ILB in the first round. TE,Edge or a big ugly(Oline or Dline)
I'm not sure Barron is a 3 down LB, not sure how well he plays the run, I see him as a upgraded version of Fort, play on passing downsI doubt we take a ILB or CB since we signed FA to fill in those spots. Why would we sign Barron to be a 3 down ILB then draft a rookie for the same roll? I might be going out on a limb but I believe we will not draft a CB or ILB in the first round. TE,Edge or a big ugly(Oline or Dline)