so I know I aint the brightest bulb in the shed ..but how is this possible. My employee whom I got the covid from around the 28th of Dec has tested negative the last 2 weeks once with an at home test once at the doctor because he went with his prego GF as well as her testing negative after she had tested positive when he did. She went into labor today they went to the hospital....they both tested positive...something sure smells fishy...they are both vaxedx2
It's actually becoming comical at this point. Like when I talk to my dog. Or I talk to a 3 year old.
OK Floggy....sit still and listen closely. And we will make it as simple as we can for your small brain.
This is what Bret said:
BAIER: Speaking of statistics, it seems to make a big difference if a person in the hospital is in the hospital for COVID-19 or with COVID-19. It's been almost a year since you've been running the agency. Do we have that split on numbers?
Here is Bret's picture: . Bret is a nice man. He said the words above^^^^
This is how the CDC director Walensky responded:
WALENSKY: You know, what I will say it differs by each variant. First of all, we're doing screening in many hospitals, of everybody who’s walking in the door.
Here is her picture: . She is an idiot. She said the words above^^^^
Her response is an acknowledgment of Bret's question. That means agreement. She is agreeing not only that there is a difference between patients hospitalized WITH Covid or BECAUSE of Covid, but says they are looking into it also and that their data sucks.
Maybe the video would help you to see you've been spanked again?
No, it couldn’t be 336,000. How? Statistically? If you were counting anyone who was within 7 years of death? Sure, I could possibly see that. Within 7 days of death? Nowhere close.
If the death ticker was partisan, why has it kept ticking after Inauguration Day?
How many deaths are you claiming and how do you estimate the likelihood of the coincidence of someone having Covid and dying of another cause completely unrelated to Covid?
We have been saying all along the numbers aren't accurate and overblown. We includes millions of people. By how much? Who knows. So you divert to asking by how much? Who could calculate that? Your CDC hasn't updated some critical data since October. There's no standard of reporting.
All we know is the #s are wrong. Probably way wrong but there's no way to track that.
so I know I aint the brightest bulb in the shed ..but how is this possible. My employee whom I got the covid from around the 28th of Dec has tested negative the last 2 weeks once with an at home test once at the doctor because he went with his prego GF as well as her testing negative after she had tested positive when he did. She went into labor today they went to the hospital....they both tested positive...something sure smells fishy...they are both vaxedx2
No, it couldn’t be 336,000. How? Statistically? If you were counting anyone who was within 7 years of death? Sure, I could possibly see that. Within 7 days of death? Nowhere close.
If the death ticker was partisan, why has it kept ticking after Inauguration Day?
It has to do with what you loonies are willing to believe.
Define “not 100%”. How many deaths are you claiming and how do you estimate the likelihood of the coincidence of someone having Covid and dying of another cause completely unrelated to Covid?
let me sum up what most rational people now believe.
Vax may have worked somewhat to reduce severity of original COVID strains.
Vax now seems to do little if anything against delta and omicron
Vax does not prevent covid
vax does not prevent you spreading Covid
Delta and omicron are proven far less severe that previous variants
new studies are now suggesting that continued boosters can actually lower you body‘s immune system.
For people under 65 and without significant comorbidities, the side effects of the Vax are more worrisome than actually getting delta or omicron.
There are now proven therapeutic like monoclonal antibodies and ivermectin that make the Vax less necessary, nearly useless, or possibly even needlessly risky.
It's actually becoming comical at this point. Like when I talk to my dog. Or I talk to a 3 year old.
OK Floggy....sit still and listen closely. And we will make it as simple as we can for your small brain.
This is what Bret said:
BAIER: Speaking of statistics, it seems to make a big difference if a person in the hospital is in the hospital for COVID-19 or with COVID-19. It's been almost a year since you've been running the agency. Do we have that split on numbers?
Here is Bret's picture: View attachment 7789. Bret is a nice man. He said the words above^^^^
This is how the CDC director Walensky responded:
WALENSKY: You know, what I will say it differs by each variant. First of all, we're doing screening in many hospitals, of everybody who’s walking in the door.
Here is her picture: View attachment 7790. She is an idiot. She said the words above^^^^
Her response is an acknowledgment of Bret's question. That means agreement. She is agreeing not only that there is a difference between patients hospitalized WITH Covid or BECAUSE of Covid, but says they are looking into it also and that their data sucks.
Maybe the video would help you to see you've been spanked again?
let me sum up what most rational people now believe.
Vax may have worked somewhat to reduce severity of original COVID strains.
Vax now seems to do little if anything against delta and omicron
Vax does not prevent covid
vax does not prevent you spreading Covid
Delta and omicron are proven far less severe that previous variants
new studies are now suggesting that continued boosters can actually lower you body‘s immune system.
For people under 65 and without significant comorbidities, the side effects of the Vax are more worrisome than actually getting delta or omicron.
There are now proven therapeutic like monoclonal antibodies and ivermectin that make the Vax less necessary, nearly useless, or possibly even needlessly risky.
Oh she emphatically is. Says we are looking into that. If there had been no discrepancy by with covid and because of covid, she wouldn't admit they are screening patients as they come in....
God this is too easy.
You may be the only person of the planet still hanging on.
Oh she emphatically is. Says we are looking into that. If there had been no discrepancy by with covid and because of covid, she wouldn't admit they are screening patients as they come in....
God this is too easy.
You may be the only person of the planet still hanging on.
St. Luke's says 80% of COVID-positive patients were admitted specifically for the virus, despite claims that most patients tested positive only after being admitted for something else.
Here’s something else becoming clear. The Dems are seeing the polls. They know that outside of NY and CA people are done with Covid. They have no fear of it and are living their lives normally and Dems know their over the top policies are going to crush them in the elections. So they are looking for a endgame where they don’t admit they are wrong.
That’s part of why they are desperate for mandates and Vax. They want to be able to say that their policies ended Covid and everything they did was justified. They can’t have it just go away on it’s own. Then people will feel violated and won’t as easily give up their freedoms for the next situation that they use to grab power.
And we've provided links showing what I'm claiming to be true. It is documented fact. You can find the information by state. How much each state was getting in kick backs per Covid case they handled.
There was irrefutably a financial incentive. It's not even arguable.
HHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. Some of the states hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic will receive less funding than states touched relatively lightly, according to an...
www.beckershospitalreview.com
Below is a breakdown of how much funding per COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid. Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The New York Times for its analysis.
Alabama
$158,000 per COVID-19 case
Alaska
$306,000
Arizona
$23,000
Arkansas
$285,000
California
$145,000
Colorado
$58,000
Connecticut
$38,000
Delaware
$127,000
District of Columbia
$56,000
Florida
$132,000
Georgia
$73,000
Hawaii
$301,000
Idaho
$100,000
Illinois
$73,000
Indiana
$105,000
Iowa
$235,000
Kansas
$291,000
Kentucky
$297,000
Louisiana
$26,000
Maine
$260,000
Maryland
$120,000
Massachusetts
$44,000
Michigan
$44,000
Minnesota
$380,000
Mississippi
$166,000
Missouri
$175,000
Montana
$315,000
Nebraska
$379,000
Nevada
$98,000
New Hampshire
$201,000
New Jersey
$18,000
New Mexico
$171,000
New York
$12,000
North Carolina
$252,000
North Dakota
$339,000
Ohio
$180,000
Oklahoma
$291,000
Oregon
$220,000
Pennsylvania
$68,000
Rhode Island
$52,000
South Carolina
$186,000
South Dakota
$241,000
Tennessee
$166,000
Texas
$184,000
Utah
$94,000
Vermont
$87,000
Virginia
$201,000
Washington
$58,000
West Virginia
$471,000
Wisconsin
$163,000
Wyoming
$278,000
Yep. No financial incentive at all to **** with Covid numbers. Just $30Billion to be had.