There's a reason Spillane is backing up Bush. And using topseeds quote, he's also proving why your stats from their last 8 games played aren't enough. There's not enough variety of teams played. It's also been pointed out, you're taking two different years of playing for Bush.
You really have no clue how to properly use stats in an argument.
Spillane has filed in admirable, but he's no Bush. Just like we HOPE Highsmith fills in admirable for Dupree, but he's not Bud.
I guess in your world, Bush is the new Troy. Troys head was too big, therefore he was body short, and was a liability (this was your lame argument). Bush is short and his arms are short, therefore he'll never be able to cover anyone.
There a reason you picked 8 games, why? Why not go with career? Spillane has played 22 games, Bush 21. Would that not be a more accurate comparison? Oh I know why....
Spillane - 22 g, 51 tack, 42 solo, 2 sacks, 1 int, 0 ff, 1 fr, 1 TD.
Bush - 21 g, 113 tack, 66 solo, 2 sacks, 2 int, 1 ff, 4 fr, 1 TD.
Because then it's more obvious...doesn't fit your agenda
Sent from my iPhone using
Steeler Nation mobile app