• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The weird... It just continues.

wig

Well-known member
Forefather
Contributor
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
11,067
Reaction score
13,222
Points
113
Between the Jets, the Titans, the Bucs and the Jaguars, you are looking at the 28th, 29th, 30th, and 31st worst teams in the league, followed only by the Raiders (who you KNOW would kick our *** this year.)

We've played three of them so far, lost to two and beat one with a late FG. And now, we are heading down to face the Titans. Arguably one of the better of the "crappy teams".

Ah, the irony.

I have to admit this game feels like a "double trap" game where the players KNOW it's a trap game so they PLAN for it to be a trap game so they feel as though they have prepared themselves so well that they can't possibly lose so that they in fact come in flat and have themselves a trap game.

That and the general idea that the coaching staff puts forth the usual ridiculous game-plan and then refuses to make any changes whatsoever when they see that the Titans are completely countering everything the Steelers are doing, opting instead to stand on the sidelines with aviator sunglasses, contemplating infinity.
 
Last edited:
They could do themselves a favor and if they win the damn coin toss put the offense out there to try and score first instead of putting a struggling defense out there to try and get a 3 and out. That would be a better start, IMO.

Pappy
 
I have always liked the option of being able to score at the end of the half and get the ball back at the start of the second. Our offense first series was a three and out, followed by a turnover on it's next possession deep in our territory. The defense as wounded as it was held the other team to a field goal which in today's game is good. The offense had a chance to build a lead but did not. Those guys stunk up the joint for the first three quarters of the game. They only needed 21 points to win the damn game and failed to do anything meaningful until garbage time. I think the best unit should be on the field and right now it is the defense that is playing the bottom of its roster.
 
I have always liked the option of being able to score at the end of the half and get the ball back at the start of the second. Our offense first series was a three and out, followed by a turnover on it's next possession deep in our territory. The defense as wounded as it was held the other team to a field goal which in today's game is good. The offense had a chance to build a lead but did not. Those guys stunk up the joint for the first three quarters of the game. They only needed 21 points to win the damn game and failed to do anything meaningful until garbage time. I think the best unit should be on the field and right now it is the defense that is playing the bottom of its roster.

I'll have to disagree with the best unit being the defense, they're playing better, but if the Steelers are relying on the defense to make a stop late in a game that's not the situation I'd want to see. I'd rather the offense have to make first downs to win the game or be losing and need a score late in the game rather than put the onus on the defense.

That's just my opinion of what I've seen this year.

Papillon
 
I have always liked the option of being able to score at the end of the half and get the ball back at the start of the second. Our offense first series was a three and out, followed by a turnover on it's next possession deep in our territory.

Actually the first series was a 6 play drive that went 2 yards. They kept everything so close to the LOS that the Jets just needed to play 8 in the box to stop everything the Steelers were doing. The offensive game plan was offensive. They gave the Jets too much credit and played them like they were playing the Broncos. Short quick passes and screens when the defenses' weakness was the secondary. Just stupidity on display.
 
We could always take the ball, which would then give us the option of returning an interception for a touchdown at the end of the first half and again to start the second half.
 
Actually the first series was a 6 play drive that went 2 yards. They kept everything so close to the LOS that the Jets just needed to play 8 in the box to stop everything the Steelers were doing. The offensive game plan was offensive. They gave the Jets too much credit and played them like they were playing the Broncos. Short quick passes and screens when the defenses' weakness was the secondary. Just stupidity on display.

The game plan was conservative, but we're looking at it in hindsight. With the way the offense had been playing the three prior weeks there was no reason to believe that the Jets were going to be able to contain the Steelers, unless, of course, the Steelers helped them (which they did). I still think they should have put the offense on the field based on the prior weeks' performances and tried to score immediately. They did neither. :(

Papillon
 
I have always liked the option of being able to score at the end of the half and get the ball back at the start of the second. Our offense first series was a three and out, followed by a turnover on it's next possession deep in our territory. The defense as wounded as it was held the other team to a field goal which in today's game is good. The offense had a chance to build a lead but did not. Those guys stunk up the joint for the first three quarters of the game. They only needed 21 points to win the damn game and failed to do anything meaningful until garbage time. I think the best unit should be on the field and right now it is the defense that is playing the bottom of its roster.

how long have you been a member of the Kommunist party, komrade Vingman?
 
The game plan was conservative, but we're looking at it in hindsight. With the way the offense had been playing the three prior weeks there was no reason to believe that the Jets were going to be able to contain the Steelers, unless, of course, the Steelers helped them (which they did). I still think they should have put the offense on the field based on the prior weeks' performances and tried to score immediately. They did neither. :(

Papillon

Everything said now is in hindsight. When the players watch the film it is in hindsight. However, the game plan was put in before the game. So it's perfectly reasonable to criticize the game plan after the fact since we can't criticize it before the fact. Even in the game thread people were upset with all the short passes and screens. Which is in total contrast to what the offense did the previous two games. It was almost as if the coaches thought the Jets secondary was great and their front 7 sucked. That's how they called the game and why they got their *** handed to them.

I don't really care about deferring or taking the ball. It shouldn't matter in the out come of this game.
 
I have to admit this game feels like a "double trap" game where the players KNOW it's a trap game so they PLAN for it to be a trap game so they feel as though they have prepared themselves so well that they can't possibly lose so that they in fact come in flat and have themselves a trap game.

Is that like "double secret probation?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: wig
Is that like "double secret probation?"

"MISSS-ter Tomlin. ONE and EIGHT versus teams with a losing record. Losing to inferior teams and wearing sunglasses at night is no way to go through life, son."
 
I would try something revolutionary, and start using our defenders on the offense as well.
 
They gave the Jets too much credit and played them like they were playing the Broncos. Short quick passes and screens when the defenses' weakness was the secondary. Just stupidity on display.

There's the strange thing. They have played the good teams like they needed to score 30+ points to win, and have done just that. Why not score 30 against the Jets and win by 10+ points? I know they have to go out and execute, but the game plan did not come out and say that they wanted to score a ton of points.
 
I would try something revolutionary, and start using our defenders on the offense as well.

That's just crazy enough to not work!
 
There's the strange thing. They have played the good teams like they needed to score 30+ points to win, and have done just that. Why not score 30 against the Jets and win by 10+ points? I know they have to go out and execute, but the game plan did not come out and say that they wanted to score a ton of points.

The Jets would see that coming. So the plan is to score as little as possible and win.
 
I prefer to defer. If your up, and you get the ball after the half you have a chance to build on your lead. If your down, you have the chance to change the momentum. Im hoping the team can get up for coach munch they way they got up for mean joe. If not, and we are depending on captain cliche to motivate them then we are doomed.
 
We need to honor Ham at the next home game, Lambert at the game after that, Blount (of the Mel variety) after that. Maybe these whippersnappers will listen to the old guys.
 
Top