- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 7,497
- Reaction score
- 5,032
- Points
- 113
They played Lloyd to do much more than rush the passer; he was great at EVERYTHING. If you think Porter was a better LB than 95, I got some swampland to sell you.
Porter better than Lloyd? Smoke some more shizzie be piss pots.
Can you read? I never said he was better. You were bitching because Porter didn't hit people hard enough. What a stupid ******* statement. Porter had almost 100 sacks and 25 forced fumbles. Lloyd was a great player as well. But that doesn't mean Porter sucks because you are under the delusion that hitting hard is better than sacks or fumbles.