The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

[Ron Burgundy]

You know that answer to that. Trump is the antithesis to Christian values in every which way. Him pandering to Christians is the pinnacle of hypocracy.

Mmmkay, so Hildebeast is better in that regard and we should have voted for her or Gary Johnson instead?

I don't see that voting for President Trump was being hypocritical because we knew what we were getting. Sometimes the message is right even if the messenger is flawed. Besides which, anybody who voted to reelect Bill Clinton in 1996 has no business telling anyone else they're a hypocrite.

 

[Steelerfan]

Friday, May 4th, 2018 08.25am. Steelerfan said PASS. Let this moment forever be recorded in history.

Also, you've had about 200 Hits that were far worse than this pass.

But those 200 were at least human. What's with her face?

 

[Ron Burgundy]

But those 200 were at least human. What's with her face?

Been asking myself the same thing about David Hogg. Least symmetrical face I've ever seen. It's why he looks weird. Mom must have squeezed too hard pushing him out.

At mortuary school we're taught to look for things like that.

 

[SteelChip]

Ha ha! **** you, lying MSM!

President Donald Trump reacted to a major correction to an NBC News story, accusing the network of citing fictional sources.
“NBC NEWS is wrong again!” he wrote on Twitter on Tuesday. “They cite ‘sources’ which are constantly wrong. Problem is, like so many others, the sources probably don’t exist, they are fabricated, fiction!”

NBC News corrected their story after reporting Monday that federal authorities had wiretapped Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen, noting that it was actually a “pen register” log of phone lines that he contacted. Authorities were not able to listen to or record Cohen’s calls.

“NBC, my former home with the Apprentice, is now as bad as Fake News CNN,” Trump wrote. “Sad!” advertisement

The president criticized “fake news” on Monday, after NBC News cited anonymous White House sources about his Chief of Staff John Kelly.

“Fake News is going ‘bonkers!'” he wrote on Twitter.

I must reiterate this awesome video one more time...LOL


https://nam04.safelinks.protection..../OMLjYicYvn+ngsCTbBnRgogV/uTuwJh0=&reserved=0

 

[Superman]

Oh no! Mueller slapped down.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...am-lying-trying-to-target-trump-cmon-man.html

 

[Hypocycloids]

Facts, the very last thing you and every other Trump supporter gives two ***** about. Yes, preach to me about facts.

Ok, I'll go one fact at a time, and we'll see how good you are at accepting the facts.

Do you believe as a fact that the Christopher Steel dossier used to implicate Trump was fake?

Yes or no.

 

[Tibs]

Ok, I'll go one fact at a time, and we'll see how good you are at accepting the facts. Do you believe as a fact that the Christopher Steel dossier used to implicate Trump was fake?
Yes or no.

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

So if you're asking me if the dossier's fake (ie it doesn't exist) I say of course not, it's a proven fact it exists. If you're asking me if the things written in the dossier are fake, I don't think we have any way of knowing that. Since the information was corroborated within the FBI, it is their task to figure out if its legit and backed up by facts, hence the Special Counsel investigation.

Next question.

 

[Supersteeler]

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

So if you're asking me if the dossier's fake (ie it doesn't exist) I say of course not, it's a proven fact it exists. If you're asking me if the things written in the dossier are fake, I don't think we have any way of knowing that. Since the information was corroborated within the FBI, it is their task to figure out if its legit and backed up by facts, hence the Special Counsel investigation.

Next question.

So if I may translate...you are saying the fact that were physical papers called a dossier that you can reach out and touch makes them "real". The fact that what was inside them could possibly be completely bogus is irrelevant. I give you points for creatively skirting the question.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

Completely untrue.

So if you're asking me if the dossier's fake (ie it doesn't exist) I say of course not, it's a proven fact it exists. If you're asking me if the things written in the dossier are fake, I don't think we have any way of knowing that. Since the information was corroborated within the FBI, it is their task to figure out if its legit and backed up by facts, hence the Special Counsel investigation.

No, we know it's fake. The folks in the Hildebeast campaign said as much in their book. It was NOT corroborated by the FBI, they just let it roll because they wanted to get rid of Trump too.

 

[Spike]

4 more years!

4 more years!

hahahaha



President Trump's support is rising

49% approval among registered voters in new Reuters/Ipsos poll

Washington, DC - The Reuters/Ipsos Core Political poll has a significant realignment this week across a number of metrics. Most pronounced is President Trump’s approval rating which currently sits at 48% with all Americans. His number with registered voters is essentially the same at 49%.

Corresponding with Trump’s stronger approval rating, evaluations of his job performance across the board are stronger this week from 57% approving of his handling of the economy to 44% approving of the way he treats people like them.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/reuters-ipsos-data-core-political-2018-05-04

 

[Ron Burgundy]

4 more years!

4 more years!

hahahaha



President Trump's support is rising

49% approval among registered voters in new Reuters/Ipsos poll

Washington, DC - The Reuters/Ipsos Core Political poll has a significant realignment this week across a number of metrics. Most pronounced is President Trump’s approval rating which currently sits at 48% with all Americans. His number with registered voters is essentially the same at 49%.

Corresponding with Trump’s stronger approval rating, evaluations of his job performance across the board are stronger this week from 57% approving of his handling of the economy to 44% approving of the way he treats people like them.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/reuters-ipsos-data-core-political-2018-05-04

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

So if you're asking me if the dossier's fake (ie it doesn't exist) I say of course not, it's a proven fact it exists. If you're asking me if the things written in the dossier are fake, I don't think we have any way of knowing that. Since the information was corroborated within the FBI, it is their task to figure out if its legit and backed up by facts, hence the Special Counsel investigation.

Next question.

I've already previously posted articles that absolutely REFUTE the contents of this dossier, several points of which inside are BLATANTLY pointed out and proven to be false. Continue to believe the fake news you consume.

http://www.steelernationforums.com/...in-email-probe&p=491113&viewfull=1#post491113

 

[SteelChip]

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

So if you're asking me if the dossier's fake (ie it doesn't exist) I say of course not, it's a proven fact it exists. If you're asking me if the things written in the dossier are fake, I don't think we have any way of knowing that. Since the information was corroborated within the FBI, it is their task to figure out if its legit and backed up by facts, hence the Special Counsel investigation.

Next question.

Bwahahahaha.............resist Tibsy, just keep on resistin' ....you go boy.

The entire dossier was such fiction that the majority of mainstream news media outlets refused to run the story. It took fake news listicle site Buzzfeed to publish the dossier, and very fake news CNN to reference the Buzzfeed article.

CNN is now reporting that FBI Director James Comey used the “Trump Dossier” to secure a FISA warrant to secretly monitor Trump campaign aide, Carter Page.

Of course, as we reported back in January (see “Here Is The Full 35-Page Report Alleging Trump Was “Cultivated, Supported And Assisted” By Russia“) the dossier, compiled by ex-British intelligence official Chris Steele, was almost immediately discredited by the public at large after numerous glaring errors were quickly identified and salicious stories of ‘golden showers’ and other sexual acts were also dismissed as pure rubbish.

Allegedly the dossier was even available to the Clinton campaign should they have chosen to use it to discredit Trump, but even they were quickly convinced that no one would buy it.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

The entire dossier was such fiction that the majority of mainstream news media outlets refused to run the story. It took fake news listicle site Buzzfeed to publish the dossier, and very fake news CNN to reference the Buzzfeed article.

CNN is now reporting that FBI Director James Comey used the “Trump Dossier” to secure a FISA warrant to secretly monitor Trump campaign aide, Carter Page.

Of course, as we reported back in January (see “Here Is The Full 35-Page Report Alleging Trump Was “Cultivated, Supported And Assisted” By Russia“) the dossier, compiled by ex-British intelligence official Chris Steele, was almost immediately discredited by the public at large after numerous glaring errors were quickly identified and salicious stories of ‘golden showers’ and other sexual acts were also dismissed as pure rubbish.

Allegedly the dossier was even available to the Clinton campaign should they have chosen to use it to discredit Trump, but even they were quickly convinced that no one would buy it.

Eh, Quinn was reporting that over a year ago.

www.warroom.com keeping you ahead of the Rush.

 

[hamster]

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

Right out of the Democratic talking points book.

Didn't you hear, from Comey himself, that the dossier was still unverified when he was fired.
Get your facts straight.

 

[Hypocycloids]

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

So if you're asking me if the dossier's fake (ie it doesn't exist) I say of course not, it's a proven fact it exists. If you're asking me if the things written in the dossier are fake, I don't think we have any way of knowing that. Since the information was corroborated within the FBI, it is their task to figure out if its legit and backed up by facts, hence the Special Counsel investigation.

Next question.

That's not what I was getting at dingbat.
Lets dissect this

Do you believe that the DNC hired Fusion GPS, (a “premium research, strategic intelligence, and due diligence services to corporations, law firms, and investors worldwide.”) who in turn hired retired British spy Christopher Steele....resulting in a dossier written up in the style of an intelligence report and based on unnamed sources, that contained a variety of serious charges against Trump?

This was a DNC paid for political opposition research document passed off as an official intelligence report you dingbat. That is a fact. Do you believe this as fact Tibby?

If you can bring yourself to admit this is a fact then we can proceed.

 

[Tibs]

Stewey, I'm not going to sit here and re-litigate the Mueller probe or how it got started. If you want to have an adult conversation, you'll need to spend a lot more time reading about the basic facts in this case. It seems you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of them. Have a nice day, dingbat!

 

[Confluence]

Stewey, I'm not going to sit here and re-litigate the Mueller probe or how it got started. If you want to have an adult conversation, you'll need to spend a lot more time reading about the basic facts in this case. It seems you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of them. Have a nice day, dingbat!

Translation:

You got me!
I am confused, so I will advise you to do exactly what I should be doing.
I'm frustrated, so you are bad man!

Sent from my SM-N950W using Steeler Nation mobile app

 

[SteelChip]

Stewey, I'm not going to sit here and re-litigate the Mueller probe or how it got started. If you want to have an adult conversation, you'll need to spend a lot more time reading about the basic facts in this case. It seems you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of them. Have a nice day, dingbat!

Tibsy, Tibsy, Tibsy...your slip is showing. In the quest for eternal resistance, you seem unable to leave the Alinsky play book.

Alinsky’s 13 Rules for Radicals:

Stewey, I'm not going to sit here and re-litigate the Mueller probe

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.“ Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.

you'll need to spend a lot more time reading about the basic facts in this case. It seems you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of them

3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.“ Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

Have a nice day, dingbat!

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.“ There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

All I can add to this is.....

Tibsy

 

[Hypocycloids]

Stewey, I'm not going to sit here and re-litigate the Mueller probe or how it got started. If you want to have an adult conversation, you'll need to spend a lot more time reading about the basic facts in this case. It seems you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of them. Have a nice day, dingbat!

There you have it folks, case in point. Cant admit to what is factual but rather suggests alternative facts.

Next question.

You asked for it.

Do you believe as fact that Debbie Wasserman Shultz's DNC conspired to rig the primaries against Bernie Sanders?

 

[Hypocycloids]

Hey, this "debate" (its really not debatable) isn't supposed to be in the thread dedicated to Trump winning.

Who started this **** anyway?

 

[Yinzerlyn]

Apprently, the word "true" means something different in Europe than it does here in America.

 

[Spike]

MAGA


US Navy reactivates its Atlantic 2nd Fleet

Washington (AFP) - A top US navy admiral announces the re-establishment of the US 2nd Fleet -- a Cold War command disbanded in 2011 -- to patrol the North Atlantic and face a resurgent threat from Russia.

The chief of US Naval Operations, Admiral John Richardson, made the announcement during a change of command ceremony Friday in the Atlantic naval port of Norfolk, Virginia.

"Our National Defense Strategy makes clear that we're back in an era of great power competition as the security environment continues to grow more challenging and complex," said Richardson, according to a navy statement.

"That's why today, we're standing up Second Fleet to address these changes, particularly in the north Atlantic."

The 2nd Fleet command was disbanded as a cost-savings measure in 2011, and its assets and personnel dispersed within the navy.

The new command will be responsible for US naval forces along the US east coast as well as the north Atlantic region, a navy statement said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-navy-reactivates-atlantic-2nd-fleet-155635347.html

 

[deljzc]

MAGA


US Navy reactivates its Atlantic 2nd Fleet

Washington (AFP) - A top US navy admiral announces the re-establishment of the US 2nd Fleet -- a Cold War command disbanded in 2011 -- to patrol the North Atlantic and face a resurgent threat from Russia.

The chief of US Naval Operations, Admiral John Richardson, made the announcement during a change of command ceremony Friday in the Atlantic naval port of Norfolk, Virginia.

"Our National Defense Strategy makes clear that we're back in an era of great power competition as the security environment continues to grow more challenging and complex," said Richardson, according to a navy statement.

"That's why today, we're standing up Second Fleet to address these changes, particularly in the north Atlantic."

The 2nd Fleet command was disbanded as a cost-savings measure in 2011, and its assets and personnel dispersed within the navy.

The new command will be responsible for US naval forces along the US east coast as well as the north Atlantic region, a navy statement said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-navy-reactivates-atlantic-2nd-fleet-155635347.html

This can't be true, Trump is Putin's pawn and only does what Putin tells him to do.

Tibs' memes showed me that numerous times and Tibs meme's are always 100% accurate.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

No, not at all. Not only was it not fake, the contents overlapped with information the FBI had already gathered from other sources. Christopher Steele is a well respected foreign services officer with an impeccable track record spanning decades.

So if you're asking me if the dossier's fake (ie it doesn't exist) I say of course not, it's a proven fact it exists. If you're asking me if the things written in the dossier are fake, I don't think we have any way of knowing that. Since the information was corroborated within the FBI, it is their task to figure out if its legit and backed up by facts, hence the Special Counsel investigation.

Next question.

Mods, can you move this to the Russian thread? That's where it belongs.