Ike, two questions, which I'm sure have been answered, but if you could give me your take on them
1.). If both EVENS & Vander are available 1st rnd and their "value" merit it, which do you take and why??
2.). IF BPA turns out to be a QB in the first round who do you think it would be and would you take him???
Thanks for your input.
Salute the nation
Drink,
Both Evans and LVE have their strengths and weaknesses based upon the ad nauseam conversations by talking heads and the free presses of draft guides. I don’t prognosticate players because I don’t take the time to immerse myself in watching film and diagnosing the players trends and performances. I just don’t have the time. I am appreciative of the guys that really do the bare bones work and take the time to really evaluate.
Having said that there are a couple professionals who IMO do good work in talent evaluation. Mayock is one, there are a couple other guys too. I am only talking about evaluation too. Not draft predictions because other than the top 5, no one really knows anything.
It’s a pipe dream, but I would want Smith....LOL. He could replace Ryan at the 80th percentile.
Based on several evaluations I’ve read, Evans or LVE would appear to be solid as off the ball backers. Evans probably could be like C.J. Mosley and that’s the problem. Folks talk about Mosley, but if you’ve seen him play you have seen him make plays in games and disappear in games. Evans could be that, but he would be a solid player. Him not running the 40 is curious, but this may have been discussed already with teams. KC has already said, 40 times are not the indicator they primarily use for speed evaluations. Game tape is. It just seems that way because Gorshack runs the 40times at the combine.
I don’t think he will be Jarvis 2.0. He has way more strength than Jarvis did and all the literature has him having much better instincts. Plus nothing can compare to playing the SEC schedule.
LVE looks tremendous at the backer position. I just have one problem, and all the evaluators mention this. Why only one year of production? What changed? How did the light turn on? Every evaluation I’ve read on LVE says he has the ability to be a productive tackler and a solid coverage backer. But will he be? He will need work running through trash but most rookie LBs do. But there is that Scott Shields scenario that sticks in my mind. KC hits home runs in the first and it’s usually with power 5 conferences.
They could get one of the top Safeties and grab one of those quick Inside backers later. I wouldn’t have a problem with it at all if they did. I don’t think they are going to find another Shazier, but they can do the same with a fast backer and cover safety.
As for QBs.....we have no chance for those top guys. If Rudolph is available in the second, I could see them grabbing him. The kid from Louisville....too many questions are generated by the evaluators and I think someone will reach for him in the first. He has to be placed in a good situation, like Prescott and Wilson. Otherwise I don’t think he would be a good fit for this offense.
It’s my observation and only mine. Some may agree, many others will not which is perfectly fine. In any case, there are almost 300 players in this draft, I think KC and company will get at least 5 good players to help this team. You can’t ask more than that.
Sent from my iPad using
Steeler Nation mobile app