Chuck Noll "A Football Life" on NFL Network Friday night at 9:00 pm. Like starting now.
Wasn't it interesting, that he told his wife. that this is a Super Bowl team. but I just don't have anything left, and retired. Cowher took them to an 12-4 record that year and #1 seed.
Wasn't it interesting, that he told his wife. that this is a Super Bowl team. but I just don't have anything left, and retired. Cowher took them to an 12-4 record that year and #1 seed.
Chuck Noll "A Football Life" on NFL Network Friday night at 9:00 pm. Like starting now.
Cowher turned that roster over pretty quick though, how many of Nolls players were starting in the Super Bowl?I have been making this argument for years in response to the "Tomlin won with Cowher players" crap. The core of Cowher's first teams were Noll players.
I made this argument not because I feel Tomlin is this great coach, but because it is a stupid ****** argument. Whoever the coach is when they win is who deserves the credit.
Cowher turned that roster over pretty quick though, how many of Nolls players were starting in the Super Bowl?
Give me a coach like Chuck Noll anyday over Cowher or Tomlin. We went from a man's coach to a Pussified Coach.....OBVIOUSLY!
I think the main argument is that he's been here 10 years now and not one unit is better now than what he took over, and as the cowher players left the team got worse.And that's fine. I have no argument to that. Cowher deserves all of the credit for what he accomplished from the minute he became head coach, as did Noll and as does Tomlin.
What I don't understand about the venom towards Tomlin in this regard is he deserves credit for not being a huge ego and having to put his stamp on the team like so many coaches do. He could have come in and turned the team over. How stupid would have that been? Which is even more reason the whole argument is just asinine.
I think when Noll coached, coaches didn't have to treat players like prima dona cry babies. Teams will get rid of the coach before the high paid entitled whiner player these days.I think there's room for both style of coaches, but in today's game, having a great teaching coach who pays attention to detail is something rare. I don't think there are many coaches today that take this approach and I see a lot of value in it.
Excellent show. If anyone doubts he should be in the conversation for best of all time, you should see it.
I think when Noll coached, coaches didn't have to treat players like prima dona cry babies. Teams will get rid of the coach before the high paid entitled whiner player these days.
Wasn't it interesting, that he told his wife. that this is a Super Bowl team. but I just don't have anything left, and retired. Cowher took them to an 12-4 record that year and #1 seed.
He gets credit for not getting rid of all the good players when he came in? That's really reaching for something positive.And that's fine. I have no argument to that. Cowher deserves all of the credit for what he accomplished from the minute he became head coach, as did Noll and as does Tomlin.
What I don't understand about the venom towards Tomlin in this regard is he deserves credit for not being a huge ego and having to put his stamp on the team like so many coaches do. He could have come in and turned the team over. How stupid would have that been? Which is even more reason the whole argument is just asinine.
He gets credit for not getting rid of all the good players when he came in? That's really reaching for something positive.
I think the main argument is that he's been here 10 years now and not one unit is better now than what he took over, and as the cowher players left the team got worse.