- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,572
- Reaction score
- 4,330
- Points
- 113
So I haven't even heard of visit for him yet. Now that Blake is gone I'd be very interested in signing him back if he'd consider it.
So I haven't even heard of visit for him yet. Now that Blake is gone I'd be very interested in signing him back if he'd consider it.
Gay **** boykin
^^^
**** in the middle. I think **** should be outside. Boykin in the middle
I did like Boykin but like I said earlier I've heard from a reliable source that he had a hard time learning our scheme. Apparently he has an issue of some sort. But he did figure it out eventually and I thought he played well. With the time investment I say bring him back.
They need to sign someone in FA for depth, if nothing else. They aren't going to sign more than one CB in the draft (at least I doubt they will) so signing Boykin and/or someone else is still needed.
So it should be **** Boykin gay
Gay **** Boykin jamming receivers off the line?. Sounds like something Phil Simms masturbates to or a gay porn movie. Probably the same thing.
The "issue" Boykin had with learning the playbook was that he wasn't comfortable giving 15 yard cushions to watch the WR blow by or miss a tackle....that's why Tomlin kept Blake in over him. Too bad the continuous starting of Blake over Boykin probably cost a player that had coverage ability and ball skills as well as a draft pick. At least we don't have Blake anymore, the silver lining of addition through subtraction.
Boykin probably off to ATL, but I'd welcome him back if we could get it done.
**** Boykin Gay Golson