All I have to say about the botched kicking situation by Tomlin is that's its been a very expensive one indeed. Not only did this guy miss two in NE that may have changed the outcome of that game but the two against the Rats that definitely changed the outcome. Now factor into that Scobee costs this team a 6'th round pick in 2016. More evidence of poor management when we could have brought in Henry for no draft pick and he couldn't have been any worse than Scobee who had a 76% accuracy from 40 -49 yards last year. No wonder Jags were trying out new kickers since this one flat out wasn't getting it done any more. But I suppose Tomlin liked his ******* pedigree.
Why waste a draft pick on Scobee when there were similar kickers available for free, typical Tombert who have managed this team into mediocrity.
Punting?
Scobee just made 2.5 million dollars to be horrible?
Outright release or trade? If the latter what would you trade him for?OK can we release Tomlin next? That would make it a hell of good day.
Did he tear it making a tackle or was it a fluke injury?
They probably knew Scobee was going to be terrible but just decided to trade for him anyhow.. or did they trade for him because his career numbers say he is a good kicker?
Think logically.
I can understand the punt option but I think the psychology behind it was 1) Scobee was mentally ****** from his two previous misses so a third attempt was NOT in the cards 2) Tomlin wanted to be aggressive and play to WIN and NOT TO LOSE. Baltimore was stacking the box and im not sure running between the tackles would've netted a sure first down, hence the call to have Vick roll out and read on the one play and then the pass call to Brown (our best WR) on the other. Had we ran Bell up the middle and it gotten stuffed we would've second guessed wondering why we didn't look for Brown. We needed TWO yard.....just TWO. Everybody in this forum believes this team can get TWO yards when it needs. Baltimore felt it could and tried it twice as well ...and lost the gamble.
The difference in the game wasn't coaching no matter how you break it down...the difference in THIS GAME was Tucker and Scobee. Cant spin it any other way
It was coaching PERIOD. No doubt about it. You don't lose a game by putting it in the hands of a QB who's had TWO DAYS to practice with the 1st offense. It makes no sense and it's 100% on Tomlin because he's the HC and checked off on those stupid plays. The kicker had already missed BOTH FGs and you were still leading in the game with around a minute left. He had two good options. He could have punted and made them go much further for the FG OR he could have ran the best back in the NFL and got the first. He decided to do neither. He ran a 35 year old QB on a sweep when he wasn't in football shape. Probably the dumbest thing you could do in that situation.
So the difference in the game is that the Steelers HC made boneheaded moves and it cost them a win.
It was coaching PERIOD. No doubt about it. You don't lose a game by putting it in the hands of a QB who's had TWO DAYS to practice with the 1st offense. It makes no sense and it's 100% on Tomlin because he's the HC and checked off on those stupid plays. The kicker had already missed BOTH FGs and you were still leading in the game with around a minute left. He had two good options. He could have punted and made them go much further for the FG OR he could have ran the best back in the NFL and got the first. He decided to do neither. He ran a 35 year old QB on a sweep when he wasn't in football shape. Probably the dumbest thing you could do in that situation.
So the difference in the game is that the Steelers HC made boneheaded moves and it cost them a win.
OK can we release Tomlin next? That would make it a hell of good day.
I feel a little bad for Scobee. Here you got a guy who was kicking in Jacksonville, where nobody gives a ****. They could give a **** less about that football team. He comes here, where fans will discuss and dissect a play in a game in which they win for days, let alone when they lose. Poor guy wasn't ready for it.
It was coaching PERIOD. No doubt about it. You don't lose a game by putting it in the hands of a QB who's had TWO DAYS to practice with the 1st offense. It makes no sense and it's 100% on Tomlin because he's the HC and checked off on those stupid plays. The kicker had already missed BOTH FGs and you were still leading in the game with around a minute left. He had two good options. He could have punted and made them go much further for the FG OR he could have ran the best back in the NFL and got the first. He decided to do neither. He ran a 35 year old QB on a sweep when he wasn't in football shape. Probably the dumbest thing you could do in that situation.
So the difference in the game is that the Steelers HC made boneheaded moves and it cost them a win.
Did you say or feel this way before the trade?