Iran

[ZonaBurgh]

Actually I agree with Tibs here.
Trump is used to negotiating with normal people and not an 8th century religious lunatic death cult.

And therein lies the problem, believing that there is a negotiating approach with these trogodytes.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

I run 89 in the Ecoboost Ranger but the mpg is better than it is with 87 so it doesn't cost any more to use overall.
MPG with 93 is no better than with 89.

I need to play with this, averaged 22 MPG on the cross-country trip with the 5.0 Coyote just burning 87 and cruising 9 MPH above the posted speed limit. Next couple of tanks I'll try 89 and see if it makes a difference.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

I need to play with this, averaged 22 MPG on the cross-country trip with the 5.0 Coyote just burning 87 and cruising 9 MPH above the posted speed limit. Next couple of tanks I'll try 89 and see if it makes a difference.

I reset the mpg display at every fill-up. I average 18.5-20 mpg in mixed driving.

 

[jitter77]

Sheetz around here has 88 which is usually about 30 cents cheaper per gallon than 87

 

[DBS1970]

Said it before, I'll say it again. 30 years ago Bill Clinton, to his credit, worked a deal that would have given the Palestinians over 95% of the land they wanted and they said no.
As far as Iran, I'm done with ****ing around and $4.50 gas, just start carpet bombing them with MOAB's and be done.

Let me school you non-military people on something.

That's a problem because AIRSTRIKES AND BOMBING DO NOT WIN WARS.

You can project power via airstrikes, you cannot take and hold ground with airstrikes. You can only defeat a determined enemy by closing with and destroying them with firepower, maneuver and shock effect. You only do that with infantry, tanks, and artillery on the ground.

Putting men on the ground is going to be hard to do in that part of the world because the Strait of Hormuz is very narrow and easily interdicted with mines. We replaced the Frigates and Mine Sweepers that we used to keep Hormuz open with in the 80s and 90s with the failed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) platform. That will add a huge degree of difficulty to any seaborn invasion which will be necessary to actually defeat the Iranian Mullahs.

We can either smash them quickly with overwhelming force and merciless action or we can get embroiled in a years long quagmire. The former is cheaper in blood and treasure than the latter.

 

[Badcat]

Let me school you non-military people on something.

That's a problem because AIRSTRIKES AND BOMBING DO NOT WIN WARS.

You can project power via airstrikes, you cannot take and hold ground with airstrikes. You can only defeat a determined enemy by closing with and destroying them with firepower, maneuver and shock effect. You only do that with infantry, tanks, and artillery on the ground.

Putting men on the ground is going to be hard to do in that part of the world because the Strait of Hormuz is very narrow and easily interdicted with mines. We replaced the Frigates and Mine Sweepers that we used to keep Hormuz open with in the 80s and 90s with the failed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) platform. That will add a huge degree of difficulty to any seaborn invasion which will be necessary to actually defeat the Iranian Mullahs.

We can either smash them quickly with overwhelming force and merciless action or we can get embroiled in a years long quagmire. The former is cheaper in blood and treasure than the latter.

^^1000% this. If allowed, meaning politicians move aside and don't interfere, the US military in all of its professionalism and training, would end this bull **** "war" in a matter of hours, maybe a day. The constant handcuffs and shallow threats by men in ties and women in pants suits is the only thing keeping the world in chaos. Persia doesn't understand the word peace it only knows violence. I have a saying that I wrote in my journal shortly after returning from Bosnia and reflecting on my experiences there. "When evil knocks at your door, it must see it's reflection when opened."

 

[Confluence]

Or the developing and future trade routes for oil matter. What's wrong with the old-fashioned beige? Wait until the EU begs for pipelines thru Gaza:

 

[Sarge]

"When evil knocks at your door, it must see it's reflection when opened."

Yep. This cannot be allowed to turn into Iraq/Afghanistan part 2. Politicians need to stay far away and let the generals, subordinate commanders and soldiers do what they do best. All this shiit with rules of engagement and getting briefed by JAG before missions was stupid.

To your quote, there is no limit on what the Iranians will do to win. We have to match it at the very least. You don't win wars by dying for your country. You win wars by making your enemy die for theirs.

 

[IndySteel]

Nukes. We've used them before.

 

[BLITZ]

Yep. This cannot be allowed to turn into Iraq/Afghanistan part 2. Politicians need to stay far away and let the generals, subordinate commanders and soldiers do what they do best. All this shiit with rules of engagement and getting briefed by JAG before missions was stupid.

To your quote, there is no limit on what the Iranians will do to win. We have to match it at the very least. You don't win wars by dying for your country. You win wars by making your enemy die for theirs.

I think Patton said something like that

 

[SojournerSteel]

Let me school you non-military people on something.

That's a problem because AIRSTRIKES AND BOMBING DO NOT WIN WARS.

You can project power via airstrikes, you cannot take and hold ground with airstrikes. You can only defeat a determined enemy by closing with and destroying them with firepower, maneuver and shock effect. You only do that with infantry, tanks, and artillery on the ground.

Putting men on the ground is going to be hard to do in that part of the world because the Strait of Hormuz is very narrow and easily interdicted with mines. We replaced the Frigates and Mine Sweepers that we used to keep Hormuz open with in the 80s and 90s with the failed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) platform. That will add a huge degree of difficulty to any seaborn invasion which will be necessary to actually defeat the Iranian Mullahs.

We can either smash them quickly with overwhelming force and merciless action or we can get embroiled in a years long quagmire. The former is cheaper in blood and treasure than the latter.

How much does geography hinder us in a country much larger than Iraq?

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Let me school you non-military people on something.

That's a problem because AIRSTRIKES AND BOMBING DO NOT WIN WARS.

You can project power via airstrikes, you cannot take and hold ground with airstrikes. You can only defeat a determined enemy by closing with and destroying them with firepower, maneuver and shock effect. You only do that with infantry, tanks, and artillery on the ground.

Putting men on the ground is going to be hard to do in that part of the world because the Strait of Hormuz is very narrow and easily interdicted with mines. We replaced the Frigates and Mine Sweepers that we used to keep Hormuz open with in the 80s and 90s with the failed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) platform. That will add a huge degree of difficulty to any seaborn invasion which will be necessary to actually defeat the Iranian Mullahs.

We can either smash them quickly with overwhelming force and merciless action or we can get embroiled in a years long quagmire. The former is cheaper in blood and treasure than the latter.

To be clear, I’m not even sure why we’re there. Yes, Muzzies Bad, I got no love for Muzzies, but most of the oil going thru the Strait goes to Europe and China. Let them figure out. Trump can sign an EO banning exports of our oil and we’ll take care of ourselves.

 

[Badcat]

Nukes. We've used them before.

You want to nuke a land that has historical landmarks for Christianity? Kill hundreds of thousands of innocent children and women? The problem isn't people, it's their culture and forced religion. This is Iran in the 1960's, before the religion of hate took power. It's starting to happen here...