Oh no! Trump says Pirro is 100% wrong and it WAS vandalism. What’s your take now?
Eh…That’s just Donald being Donald, not worth getting all upset over.
The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
Eh…That’s just Donald being Donald, not worth getting all upset over.
you're on record here for saying people should be imprisoned to prevent them from preventing crimes. your fLip fLops are Legendary. Loser.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,224
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 113
So… being wrongfully arrested and charged with a crime is no big deal, but mask mandates and social distancing is a bridge too far. Dude.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,224
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 113
When criminals come up for parole, they need to compel a board into believing that they will not commit more crimes.The pedophile and felon Trump didn’t require that of the J6 traitors when he pardoned them. Carry on.
yet that is not the hypocritical hill you chose to die on.
Republicans take Trump seriously but not literally.
Democrats take Trump literally but not seriously.
While a generalization, current Democrats don't appear to have much of a sense of humor, replaced by incessant whining.
Thank you for finally, and for the first time ever - doing some research. The weekends aren't news days for me this summer. I'm either on the road every weekend, or outside 8-10 hours/day rebuilding my deck.
No, they always have some cause or crisis to be alarmed about in order to justify their existence.
Problem for us Conservatives is that we have to be just as motivated in order to get the Left, i.e. the government, to leave us alone when the truth is that we'd rather have a beer and a cigar and be out waxing our cars or barbecuing some ribs.
Last edited:
The dodge and deflect Queen strikes again. Lose the argument change the argument.
Wrongful arrests, detainments happen often, despite your inferences they are rare.
Charges are dropped fairly often
Depending on the jurisdiction and the type of offense, studies have found that anywhere from 20% to more than 50% of criminal cases are eventually dismissed before trial.The reasons vary widely:
- Insufficient evidence
- Witnesses refusing to cooperate
- Problems with search warrants
- Constitutional violations
- Plea agreements involving other charges
- Laboratory or forensic problems
- Discovery that the wrong person was arrested
What usually happens?
A typical sequence looks something like this:- Police make an arrest based on probable cause.
- Prosecutors review the evidence.
- New evidence emerges, or existing evidence proves unreliable.
- Charges are reduced or dismissed.
By all means, continue to make the case that what happened to Hearn is a once in a lifetime event, Halley's comet type event.
Last edited:
Back on the topic of winning. I'm pretty excited about this. $2K for prep year education. Room and board included. If my kids were preparing to go to college today, I'd highly encourage them to take advantage of this first.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,224
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 113
No, dodge and deflecting is changing your argument that probable cause comes after an arrest.
So, are you sticking with Pirro or has Dear Leader set you straight and you’re going back to believing that Hearn vandalized the pool?
LMAO
Those were literally not my words. But since you've deflected to the topic...You're clearly not aware that "probable cause" is a very low standard, right? Meaning police have a reasonable basis to believe that a specific person committed a crime is all it takes.
There's also a lower standard whereby someone can be detained on "reasonable suspicion"
You believe in order to be detained/arrested, 100% of verifiable evidence must be documented/obtained prior to an arrest.
Well played, Court Jester. Yer next trick?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,224
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 113
No it’s not. Police can’t arrest people because of a guess or suspicion.LMAO
You're clearly not aware that "probable cause" is a very low standard, right?
Detained. Not arrested and charged. Quit trying to change the argument.
Detained isn’t arrested and charged. Dodge! Deflect!
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,224
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 113
Gee did I say being wrongfully arrested is no big deal?
Dude.
You need to stop reading things that are not there just because it affords you a comeback.
All that’s being said is that false arrests are made frequently, AND ITS UNFORTUNATE!
Better?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,752
- Reaction score
- 18,267
- Points
- 113
Just for ***** and giggles, why were there no charges against all the damages, fires, injuries, deaths and destruction of federal and private property during BLM/artifacts protests? And the harms to police officers?
Yet for J6, with relatively little damage, and the shooting, by police, of one protester, and the clear involvement of FBI/CIA assets in encouraging folks to enter the velvet ropes, you scream, biitch, moan and bring your pFucking hypocrisy to insane levels.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,224
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 113
WTF, many people were arrested and charged with crimes during the BLM protests.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,752
- Reaction score
- 18,267
- Points
- 113
$2-3 Million to fix the J6 Capitol damages, 1270 Americans convicted of federal charges.
$1-2 Billion in BLM damages, 120 federal convictions.
From Mike Rowe today. What say you liberal left?
I'm not what you'd call a keen observer of the political climate in our country, but I do pay attention, broadly, to what's going on within our two parties. Watching the latest from Bill Maher, I was reminded of how we struggle to reconcile our support for an idea we might like, if it’s promoted by a politician we hate. And vice versa. Here though, we have an opportunity - Democrats, in particular - to speak out loudly and clearly against an ideology that has been proven, demonstrably, to be a really bad idea.
It’s alarming to see how quickly communism has been embraced by so many, but it's even more alarming, to see how many have yet to condemn it, in favor of sheltering under a “big tent.” This week, Gavin Newsom dismissed concerns over Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and progressive candidates winning key primaries, stating he would gladly campaign for them. He argued that the party must be in the "addition, not subtraction business" to retake control of Congress.
Not that anyone asked me, but…wow. The candidates that Newsom is referring to here are not subtle. They have clearly articulated precisely what they want, and exactly what they will try to accomplish if they gain power. No borders. No police. No prisons. No Senate. From each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities, and so forth. They are literally quoting Karl Marx, and they are literally on the record as desiring to completely dismantle our government and replace it with actual communism. And the Governor of California says he will campaign on their behalf, if doing so will result in a Congressional win. Truly amazing.
Seems to me, that this is best opportunity Democrats will ever have to make some kind of reasonable appeal to Independents, and those not on board with this administration. This is a chance to affirmatively distance themselves from an ideology that has caused more human suffering than any other scheme dreamt up by man. And yet, they have not.
I understand how unpopular President Trump is in the eyes of many. But if the DSA continues to grow in popularity, and the Democrats actually campaign on their behalf, I think it’ll be the largest political blunder in my lifetime. Unless of course, I’m wrong, and the DSA expands to swallow the Democratic Party, and communism winds up on the ballot. In which case, Ronald Reagan’s warning will haunt us all.
“Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction.”
I'm not what you'd call a keen observer of the political climate in our country, but I do pay attention, broadly, to what's going on within our two parties. Watching the latest from Bill Maher, I was reminded of how we struggle to reconcile our support for an idea we might like, if it’s promoted by a politician we hate. And vice versa. Here though, we have an opportunity - Democrats, in particular - to speak out loudly and clearly against an ideology that has been proven, demonstrably, to be a really bad idea.
It’s alarming to see how quickly communism has been embraced by so many, but it's even more alarming, to see how many have yet to condemn it, in favor of sheltering under a “big tent.” This week, Gavin Newsom dismissed concerns over Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and progressive candidates winning key primaries, stating he would gladly campaign for them. He argued that the party must be in the "addition, not subtraction business" to retake control of Congress.
Not that anyone asked me, but…wow. The candidates that Newsom is referring to here are not subtle. They have clearly articulated precisely what they want, and exactly what they will try to accomplish if they gain power. No borders. No police. No prisons. No Senate. From each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities, and so forth. They are literally quoting Karl Marx, and they are literally on the record as desiring to completely dismantle our government and replace it with actual communism. And the Governor of California says he will campaign on their behalf, if doing so will result in a Congressional win. Truly amazing.
Seems to me, that this is best opportunity Democrats will ever have to make some kind of reasonable appeal to Independents, and those not on board with this administration. This is a chance to affirmatively distance themselves from an ideology that has caused more human suffering than any other scheme dreamt up by man. And yet, they have not.
I understand how unpopular President Trump is in the eyes of many. But if the DSA continues to grow in popularity, and the Democrats actually campaign on their behalf, I think it’ll be the largest political blunder in my lifetime. Unless of course, I’m wrong, and the DSA expands to swallow the Democratic Party, and communism winds up on the ballot. In which case, Ronald Reagan’s warning will haunt us all.
“Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction.”
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 18,224
- Reaction score
- 7,011
- Points
- 113
BLM rioters weren’t so stupid as to record and themselves committing felonies and share it online.
Caught again jumping all over the place.
Yes, multiple individuals participating in or embedded within Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests recorded themselves committing acts of property destruction, arson, and violence. These self-recorded videos and livestreams were subsequently used by local and federal law enforcement to identify, arrest, and convict them.