Some interesting rookie news also, enjoy!
Normally but the Broderick ongoing situation changes the grand scheme of things . I think you will see a different starting 4 positionally .So I wouldnt read too much into the moving around yet. Moves in otas don't often translate to the regular season. They can, but staffs.. particularly new staffs, tend to experiment to see who is strongest where before proper camp practices start..
I think they are just looking at what their best options are for everyone.. not just forcing them into a position... which is a great thing...
The praise of Mason and the " better than I thought he was" pretty much seals his departure.
Normally....sure. But Mccarthy said he wanted to get the left side stabilized immediately, and that's why the changes were made.So I wouldnt read too much into the moving around yet. Moves in otas don't often translate to the regular season. They can, but staffs.. particularly new staffs, tend to experiment to see who is strongest where before proper camp practices start..
I think they are just looking at what their best options are for everyone.. not just forcing them into a position... which is a great thing...
The issue with him at LT is that he doesnt have optimal size and length for LT... sometimes that doesnt matter, but every draft guru thought he was gonna be a guard or RT at most...troy was a natural lt at washington thier heavy pass attack led by penix when they lost the bcs game to michigan, can move him to LT and if Jones will miss time it gives Dunker a inside on starting at LG and perhaps jones can compete at LG.
We have two quick footed OTs, with Max been the heavier one while also Troy is the better pass protector, even if his length ain't ideal his quickness makes up for it so it makes sense to have him on the left side.The issue with him at LT is that he doesnt have optimal size and length for LT... sometimes that doesnt matter, but every draft guru thought he was gonna be a guard or RT at most...
i think its a good thing they are looking at him at LT, but as others have said, its otas, and stuff they do here is often just informational experimentation that the media overanalyzes.. they need to figure out everyones best spot so the line gets as much time as possible to gel
The issue with him at LT is that he doesnt have optimal size and length for LT... sometimes that doesnt matter, but every draft guru thought he was gonna be a guard or RT at most...
i think its a good thing they are looking at him at LT, but as others have said, its otas, and stuff they do here is often just informational experimentation that the media overanalyzes.. they need to figure out everyones best spot so the line gets as much time as possible to gel
Read it, thanks for pointing it out. I get that the team desires a vet #2, but if you were going into the season starting Will Howard if Rodgers didn't sign...how is it Howard is not good enough to be #2?Home page article, good read.
Talks about Mason and QB2 currently and how the coaching staff view him.
Salute the nation
In short put your men in the best position to succeed. That corresponds with their place on the field and well as the scheme they play within.Is this what being proactive looks like?
I like it!!!!
Try some guys out everywhere and may the best men win. For Rodgers to be more effective he definitely needs to have the confidence that his blind side isn’t going to get him killed.
If the options can be explored and tweaked to the best possible OL available. No complacency, no laziness…explore ALL possibilities that are worth exploring.
Something easily figured out in training camp. I have them compete and see who rises to the top..Read it, thanks for pointing it out. I get that the team desires a vet #2, but if you were going into the season starting Will Howard if Rodgers didn't sign...how is it Howard is not good enough to be #2?
I still think Mason is gone. Can't see them carrying 4.