- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,526
- Reaction score
- 20,699
- Points
- 113
She likes @Ron Burgundy for his truck.

She likes @Ron Burgundy for his truck.

She looks so cute rumbling down the street in it.She likes @Ron Burgundy for his truck.
I have a small truck and big hands and feet.It's not the size of the truck, it's how you use it.
It won 3rd place in its class at both the 2024 and 2025 Carlisle Ford Nationals.Whoa. How does everyone think that stacks up to the luxury S10?
Friend of mine on his first jump broke both ankles, that was enough of a deterrent to never think about jumping out of a perfectly good airplane.Same here. Mrs. Burgundy rarely wears makeup, says it dries out your skin, and only washes her face with plain water for the same reason.
She turned 60 this year but looks like she's about 45. Went skydiving this year to celebrate her birthday.
Burg himself doesn't skydive, not afraid of jumping but with two knew knees I'm afraid of landing.
She got herself a pair of Ariat cowboy boots when we were in Nashville and I got her another pair for Christmas.
Supe, DBS, and Ark can vouch for Mrs. B.
So you’re disregarding the victims that want more transparency.
Do you want the perps exposed? Does Bondi? Does Blanche? You act as if Trump and the administration hasn’t acted extremely suspicious.
I suck at this? You neglected to highlight the part about victims still going to the FBI with information during Biden’s term.
An internal investigation of the Department of Justice’s handling of the Epstein case, released in 2020, made no mention of Ms. Farmer’s original complaint.
The newly released report leaves Ms. Farmer’s name redacted, describing her only as a professional artist. She had been hired by Mr. Epstein to acquire art on his behalf.
The complaint says that she had taken photos of her younger sisters — ages 16 and 12 — for her personal art work, and Ms. Farmer clarified in an interview that the photos included nude images. “Epstein stole the photos and negatives,” the handwritten F.B.I. report says. The report also says that Mr. Epstein had asked Ms. Farmer to take pictures of young girls at swimming pools and threatened to “burn her house down” if she told anyone about the photos.
Ms. Farmer said she did not hear from the F.B.I. until a decade later, when a fuller investigation ensued, ending in a 2008 plea deal for Mr. Epstein in Florida. She said she had lived in fear after trying to report Mr. Epstein.
This is a strawman argument that if you suspect the DOJ of cover up then you want the victims exposed. Again, there aren’t 100+ pages of victims identities, the grand jury document wasn’t exclusively patient identities.Nope, I'm pointing out that the MAJORITY do not.
I've already answered your question posed. You've yet to answer mine. Do you want the victims exposed, so as to face potential suiciding? Or is getting DJT so important to you that you are ok with gambling that this "might" be the hook that lands him and any of these victims suffering irreparable harm is ok?
Maybe step outside your bubble…Bill Clinton’s FBI Buried Epstein Bombshell Allegations
Another bizarre piece of the Clinton-Epstein puzzle has come to light. And I have questions.
According to a report from the New York Times, Bill Clinton’s FBI sat on a bombshell complaint about Jeffrey Epstein for nearly a decade. This revelation has me wondering whether Bill Clinton's cozy relationship with the pedophile financier played any role in that inexcusable inaction.
Former Epstein employee Maria Farmer filed a formal report with the FBI on September 3, 1996, alleging that Epstein possessed child pornography and threatened to burn down her house if she spoke out. Yet, federal authorities under the Clinton administration did absolutely nothing with the information for almost 10 years.
I'm sure @Troglodyte will let us know how outraged he is at this reporting.
Why didn't you care beforehand? You don't give a **** about the files you only care about hurting Trump. Period. You don't give one **** what Epstein did.How so?
The Trump campaign championed the release of the Epstein files.
After the election, Trumps DOJ paraded the files and Bondi bragged about how they were sitting on her desk.
Then nothing.
Then Elon and Trump have their falling out and Musk drops the bomb that Trump is in the Epstein files.
Trump started declaring that the Epstein files were a democratic hoax and any Republican supporting their release would be viewed as hostile toward the administration.
Trump reluctantly releases the files after bi-partisan pressure. They are heavily redacted and it’s met with bipartisan criticism.
That’s actually an improvement.
I had to put nerf bars on my truck for Mrs. Fan.She looks so cute rumbling down the street in it.
She occasionally complains about it being lifted but not having step bars.
how goddamned ironic, FlogMaybe step outside your bubble…
Ureña alleged that if the Department of Justice does not do so, it would confirm suspicions that the Department is releasing data selectively to "to imply wrongdoing about individuals who have already been repeatedly cleared by the very same Department of Justice, over many years, under Presidents and Attorneys General of both parties."
This is a strawman argument that if you suspect the DOJ of cover up then you want the victims exposed.
Again, there aren’t 100+ pages of victims identities, the grand jury document wasn’t exclusively patient identities.
Maybe step outside your bubble…
do you even bother reading any link you provide, before you provide it? it states right there...So now DOJ is telling us what we’re supposed to believe about what the release reveals.
And why would they consider it weaponization if the claims were credible? WTF? Wouldn’t that be justice?
andThe documents included an email sent by an unnamed federal prosecutor with the U.S. attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York on Jan. 7, 2020.
aaaaaaaaaandAmong the files was also a letter Epstein appeared to have written to former physician Larry Nassar, a convicted child molester, that was postmarked three days after Epstein died and referenced Trump.
"Our president also shares our love of young, nubile girls," the letter read. The document's authenticity is unknown. Accompanying it was an FBI request to conduct a handwriting analysis of it.
interestingly, this email was dated the day after the Holy Insurrection from which you clutch your pearls at its mere whisper.The U.S. attorney’s office "didn’t want any of this to be a surprise down the road," the prosecutor wrote.
Despite not being registered as an investment professional, Epstein was a fund manager for various wealthy individuals – with portfolios each worth at least $1bn.
He was officially worth more than $500m in cash and owned six properties across America and the Virgin Islands.
Flog sees "2+2=4" and thinks the answer is 3, since there are three numbers listed.So what I posted was true, that the Clinton admin worked to keep Epstein information under wraps.
Your reply....something nearly fully unrelated, that now 30 years later Clinton supports releasing all of the information.
Does your smooth brain look at those two pieces of information and say that somehow the latter wipes out the former?Probably so.
Flog sees "2+2=4" and thinks the answer is 3, since there are three numbers listed.
Flog makes Forrest Gump look like a literal rocket scientist.
Your explanation is laughable. As if there was no other way to redact the grand jury document without redacting all 100+ pages in its entirety.You clearly do.
I already explained this to you.
Who’s being transparent and who threatened those in his own party that wanted transparency? You realize that Trump considers you a “bad Republican”? Or at least did until you stopped supporting the release of the files.So what I posted was true, that the Clinton admin worked to keep Epstein information under wraps.
Your reply....something nearly fully unrelated, that now 30 years later Clinton supports releasing all of the information.
Does your smooth brain look at those two pieces of information and say that somehow the latter wipes out the former?Probably so.
do you even bother reading any link you provide, before you provide it? it states right there...
and
aaaaaaaaaand
interestingly, this email was dated the day after the Holy Insurrection from which you clutch your pearls at its mere whisper.
and let me be as clear as can be - if Trump or any other individual is guilty of committing any sexual assault or rape or pedophilic act on Epstein Island, then they should be publicly drawn and quartered.
That said, in 1993 Clinton was in the White House and we experienced the first attempt to take down the WTC - and NAFTA was approved. While Trump is a real estate developer/investor, he's got his money in other things. Enter Epstein - a financier.
I've said it before - the dude's circle was with the elite at the time, financial and political. Thus, it shouldnt be any surprise to see certain names associated with him. Amassing his wealth didnt come from working 80 hours per week as a cab driver.
To step back, wouldnt it be almost expected that someone helping another person invest millions to begin developing a personal relationship? I don't know about you, but I'd want to know precisely who someone is before letting them have access to my millions, if i had it. That would be why Epstein began "courting" people. To show he had done this for himself and could do such for a client, thus building a comfort level.
Yes, it could also be a front to his pedo and sex assaults - its not something you'd just advertise on the inside back page of Rolling Stone magazine. And quite obviously, it was a front. The question is - who knew? And of those who knew, who continued having a relationship with him - professional and/or personal?
When you look at the names and flight logs, also look at their status at that time. When did flights happen? When did those individuals stop? By many accounts, Trump cut off any communication and mingling with Epstein at some point. ******* Billy Blythe could have been being used to build a comfort level with potential clients, or current clients. I mean, a former POTUS hanging out on the island would certainly break down some walls.
We all know that Bill had an insatiable desire for sex. Its well documented. Does that mean he'd diddle kids? no.
We all know that Trump was bagging some hot pieces of ***, too (IMO, he should have stopped with Karen McDougal). Does that mean he'd diddle kids? no.
and, as usual, you read absolutely nothing.You’ve gone off the rails again. I told you I don’t idolize or worship Clinton like MAGA does Trump. Nothing Clinton might have done exonerates Trump.
Why didn't you care beforehand? You don't give a **** about the files you only care about hurting Trump. Period. You don't give one **** what Epstein did.