Pickett had the far superior first game. And tgats why just stat grabbing can absolutely lead to bad conclusions
Pickett threw three picks, two of which hit the wr in the hands and deflected for a int and one that was a desperation hail mary at the end of the game.
Browning threw one Td.. it was a garbage time Td, off a drive that started-down 3 tds with 4 minutes left and against pure prevent… up until that drive he was 5-11 for 37 yards in over a half
He finished 8-14 for 68 yards and a td
Ahhh, yes, nuance and context. Thank you. Just goes to show that stats are only part of the equation.
I hope next gen does something on his completion probability because he had a few that I would say were very low probability with lack of separation and the tight window he had to throw it into.
Yet another thing I hate about current football and the over-reliance on stupid "fantasy" stats and computer analysis .... "next gen", "analytics".... like when I hear the Monday morning mouthpieces say some stupid crap like, "that QB pass in the corner of the end zone, according to analytics, had a 10.6% chance of being a touchdown." Really? Exactly 10.6%? Where do they get this stuff?
Here's a good, reliable stat for you: Does the QB in question win, regardless of nerdy stats and over-analysis? How's his QB's 4th quarter comeback win tally?
As a post-script, I still hold Kenny accountable for his less-than-stellar progression reads and pocket awareness.. but those things are fixable. Bottom line, he's winning when it counts.