You can be a hardcore Steeler fan and have dissenting opinions on things... its isn't a hive mind here... just check a Dri Archer thread to see that....
Interesting thing on the Ben case in Georgia. The prosecutors and police could not find even enough evidence for probable cause, to indict or to proceed with charges and additional investigation. That is a much lower standard than preponderance of evidence and much less than reasonable doubt. Crimes committed here were the false ID by the child to obtain alcoholic beverages, consuming alcoholic beverages while under age, lying to a police officer, and had they gone further likely false swearing and possibly conspiracy to commit. The bar owner would also be guilty of serving a minor.
I learned early on as a police officer that one must stay focused and not rush to judgement when investigating crimes. One must look for both culpatory evidence and exculpatory evidence in every case and with the same zeal. An easy way to look at this is to treat the accused as if he was your brother and the alleged victim as if she were your sister. The failure to do that will result in someone innocent being charged and possibly convicted and in cases where a crime was committed and the wrong person convicted a guilty person goes free.
One must look at the reason a woman would lie about something like this. Revenge for any type of slight real or imagined, wanting the activity to be more than sexual gratification, possible thoughts of now being pregnant from unprotected sex, concerns that now many people including her present boy friend will know she was unfaithful, second thoughts after a consensual act. I am not saying that any of these things did happen just listing some possibilities that I have known to have taken place in sexual assault cases.
There are others but these are actual things I have discovered in the investigation of alleged crimes, sometimes people lie. Many times in the past these folks who do this repeatedly have found that telling a lie to police officers and judges will get the police to arrest someone on their say so who is later found not guilty but if they can not make bail they are punished anyway and if they do make bail they are then out the cost of posting bond.
Yes. I am a Steeler fan. Not a Ben fan. Not a front office fan. I've been a fan before these jerks and will be after. What is your point, *******?
I'm going to answer my own question. You are one of those little cunts who don't understand **** about anything, so go **** yourself.
Maybe your opinionated self, so full of certainty on this subject, could do us all a favor an establish who deserves which of your chosen monikers above?
Produce the evidence (not some bs media story) backing up your small-minded rage at Ben, and educate everyone here who has posted to the contrary
Or show yourself to be the proper bearer of your vindictive slurs because you have been lazy in your pursuit of facts, wrong in your small-minded personal conviction of Ben and a general ******** in this thread.
Which one is it?

After ben's quote in this Morning's Post Gazette about how he prefers the football, I HIGHLY doubt that Brady's lawyer will call Big Ben to testify.
Sorry for the link. I'm not privy to the problems between the parties but I agree after reading the rules and the link has been removed. From what I read in a "certain" Pittburgh newspaper, Big Ben doesn't care what football they give him, he just goes out and plays football.
That sure would NOT be a witness I would call in Tom Brady's case. Perhaps the story was leaked to keep Big Ben off the witness list of Brady. I highly doubt Roger Goodell will call him as a rebuttal witness!