- Joined
- Jul 18, 2014
- Messages
- 1,254
- Reaction score
- 865
- Points
- 113
I can't even comprehend that a referee said that there may be a "10 second runoff" associated with James catch being spotted at the 1.
There's no rational football explanation for that other than the league was desperately trying to **** the Steelers. I can only assume the ref determined the ball should be down at the 1, 1st down Steelers and he was told by New York, "Give them a 10 second runoff" and he had to get back on the line and say, "We can't there's no flag and we can't do a runoff without an offensive penalty."
More talking with New York... "No Catch!"
At this point I absolutely believe that's what happened.
Thing of it is though that this exact scenario happened to the Lions when they played the Falcons earlier in the year. Golden Tate caught a pass that looked like he scored on; they reviewed it, determined he didn't score, then hit them with a 10 second run off but the ball would be spotted at the one. However, there were like 8 seconds on the clock, so when hit with the runoff, the game ended, and the Lions didn't get a play, and lost the game as a result.