• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

**** the Patriots

hey dick, point out where it stated in the 70s that steroids were illegal.
also, while you're at it, name the other teams taking roids.

meanwhile, i can assure you that video recording your opponents in the 2000s and beyond was illegal, and only ONE team was called on it. Only ONE team lost draft picks over this. Only ONE team had a coach fined for this. Only ONE franchise was fined. Care to guess who that is?

go **** yourself with your father's dildo while calling out your mother's name.

Show me the rule that states it was and is still illegal. The league sent out a "memo" (assuming you're incapable of knowing the difference, "memos" are not included in the NFL bylaws aka "rules") out at the beginning of 2007 saying you're not allowed to film signals and use them in game. Likewise, they have to be from an "approved" spot. The fact that you and some here cling to this notion that "videotaping" is illegal and the reason for the Steelers poor record against the Pats is so beyond pathetic.

Here are a few nuggets from your idol:
“We didn’t lose the game because of any 'Spygate,' because of them having any additional things,” Cowher told 93.7 The Fan on Wednesday. “[If] they’re guilty of anything they’re guilty of arrogance because they were told not to do something but it was something everybody does. They got caught doing it with a camera.” "Stealing someone’s signals was a part of the game and everybody attempted to do that. We had people that always tried to steal signals,” said Cowher, whose 2004 team won 16 consecutive games before losing to the Patriots in the AFC title game. “What happened when we lost that game is they outplayed us. It had nothing to do with stealing signals or cheating or anything else.

Enjoy!
 
Show me the rule that states it was and is still illegal. The league sent out a "memo" (assuming you're incapable of knowing the difference, "memos" are not included in the NFL bylaws aka "rules") out at the beginning of 2007 saying you're not allowed to film signals and use them in game. Likewise, they have to be from an "approved" spot. The fact that you and some here cling to this notion that "videotaping" is illegal and the reason for the Steelers poor record against the Pats is so beyond pathetic.

Here are a few nuggets from your idol:
“We didn’t lose the game because of any 'Spygate,' because of them having any additional things,” Cowher told 93.7 The Fan on Wednesday. “[If] they’re guilty of anything they’re guilty of arrogance because they were told not to do something but it was something everybody does. They got caught doing it with a camera.” "Stealing someone’s signals was a part of the game and everybody attempted to do that. We had people that always tried to steal signals,” said Cowher, whose 2004 team won 16 consecutive games before losing to the Patriots in the AFC title game. “What happened when we lost that game is they outplayed us. It had nothing to do with stealing signals or cheating or anything else.

Enjoy!
whatever you want to tell yourself to remedy the butt hurt that is proven that only ONE team was fined, lost draft picks, had their ugg-boot wearing ***** *** Qb suspended, coach fined and are FOREVER tainted as cheaters.

though, i'm positive once the limp wristed ***** at QB retires, you'll slither back under the rock you came from and go back to being a CFL fan.
 
deflategate never happened, right?

the Pats just became geniuses at holding onto the ball.

UPDATED-Patriots-Fumble-Rate-Histogram-Comparison-00-06-v-07-141.png
 
http://www.businessinsider.com/espn-report-patriots-spygate-scandal-2015-9

According to a bombshell report from ESPN's "Outside the Lines," the Spygate scandal — in which the Patriots were caught videotaping opponents' defensive signals — is perhaps the primary reason the NFL tried to nail them for Deflategate.

The report details Spygate as we've never heard it, painting a picture of systematic cheating that went way further and looks way worse for the Patriots than people previously realized.

First, the Patriots had a detailed, efficient system for finding out opponents' plays. ESPN's Don Van Natta Jr. and Seth Wickersham describe a scene in Patriots coach Bill Belichick's office before a season-opener against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers:

"[A backup quarterback named John] Friesz was told that the Patriots had a tape of the Bucs' signals. He was instructed to memorize them, and during the game, to watch Bucs defensive coordinator Monte Kiffin and tell [offensive coordinator Charlie] Weis the defensive play, which Weis would relay over the radio headset system to quarterback Drew Bledsoe."

Van Natta and Wickersham report that although the Patriots lost that game, they realized a "schematic" edge over other teams. They "streamlined the system," finding a more efficient way to note the plays and relay the information, cutting out the quarterbacks, with only a few people, including Belichick.

Soon, advanced scouts would be sent to the games of upcoming Patriots' opponents to film the play signals. The scouts would go undercover as media members, with media credentials listed under "Patriots TV" or "Kraft Productions" and were prepared with excuses of what to say they were filming if security asked.

According to Van Natta and Wickersham, "Each video sequence would usually include three shots: the down and distance, the signal, and, as an in-house joke, a tight shot of a cheerleader's top or skirt."

The tapes would then go to a Belichick confidant named Ernie Adams, an "amateur historian of pro football," who would have the tapes edited and match the notes of the play calls and signals to the action on the field.

The Patriots started a library of videotapes from teams all across the league. A former Patriots assistant coach told ESPN "It got out of control."

According to the report, the system grew to the point that the Patriots would add players cut from upcoming opponents to look at Adams' tapes and judge their effectiveness.

But wait, there's more!

The effectiveness of the spying is reportedly debated among former Patriots staffers, some of whom say Adams wasn't good at his job.

Other methods of cheating reportedly include:

Sending low-level Patriots employees to sneak into the visiting locker room during pregame warm-ups and steal the play sheet. As Van Natta and Wickersham note, "The practice became so notorious that some coaches put out fake play sheets for the Patriots to swipe."
Sending employees through the visiting team's hotel to try to swipe playbooks and scouting reports.
"Scrambling and jamming" opponent radio headsets to interfere with opponent communication.
 
deflategate never happened, right?

the Pats just became geniuses at holding onto the ball.

UPDATED-Patriots-Fumble-Rate-Histogram-Comparison-00-06-v-07-141.png

I noticed you didn't attach any graphs showing that their fumble rate last year was in line with recent history.

Also funny how you quickly dismiss simple chemistry. Then again, I wouldn't take you for a guy that knew about basic gases. I'm sure your tires stay just the same PSI in those cold winters down there. You should call up the dozens of institutes that did their own studies and found that NE's footballs (along with the Colts who ironically had 3 of the 4 balls they tested under the 12.5 PSI minimum) all fell into the expected range of the Ideal Gas Law. I'm sure they had much more to gain by doing this study than a company who has been proven to be hired guns (i.e. read up about Exponent claiming second hand smoke doesn't cause cancer. Let me know if you need any more lessons, I'm here all week!
 
I kind of agree with the idea of pulling out the old Miami game where they beat the Patriots with the wild cat.

That might be our only hope. Get the running game going, control the clock. Maybe mix up the defense enough to slow down Brady for a series or two. No turnovers. Maybe win something like 27-24.

If Tomlin and Haley believe "next man up" with Landry Jones and expect to run the exact offense that Roethlisberger does, you are going to fail in a big way.

I'd take Jones off the field completely. Run a wildcat with Bell AND Williams. Double TE sets and try to pound it down their throats. They are thin in the front-7 right now anyhow. Man up on them and grind it out. I think Bell can throw enough to keep them honest on the outside because Brown is so good at getting separation one-on-one he's not like a small window to throw to. And on the other side, you can throw up jump balls for Coates.

I'd take my chance with that.
 
whatever you want to tell yourself to remedy the butt hurt that is proven that only ONE team was fined, lost draft picks, had their ugg-boot wearing ***** *** Qb suspended, coach fined and are FOREVER tainted as cheaters.

though, i'm positive once the limp wristed ***** at QB retires, you'll slither back under the rock you came from and go back to being a CFL fan.

"Limp wristed *****." That's adorable. I'd call Big Ben a limp dicked ***** but we all know he doesn't stay limp for long when cornering girls in the bathroom of a bar.
 
I kind of agree with the idea of pulling out the old Miami game where they beat the Patriots with the wild cat.

That might be our only hope. Get the running game going, control the clock. Maybe mix up the defense enough to slow down Brady for a series or two. No turnovers. Maybe win something like 27-24.

If Tomlin and Haley believe "next man up" with Landry Jones and expect to run the exact offense that Roethlisberger does, you are going to fail in a big way.

I'd take Jones off the field completely. Run a wildcat with Bell AND Williams. Double TE sets and try to pound it down their throats. They are thin in the front-7 right now anyhow. Man up on them and grind it out. I think Bell can throw enough to keep them honest on the outside because Brown is so good at getting separation one-on-one he's not like a small window to throw to. And on the other side, you can throw up jump balls for Coates.

I'd take my chance with that.

Actual football talk, nice. We are a bit thin in the Front 7 so I would expect a very heavy dosage of Bell/Williams. You still have a ton of playmakers on offense. Pound the ball consistently, hope to draw the defense in, then take some shots with DHB, Coates, and AB down field. I'd expect to see a lot of end arounds with your speedy receivers as well.

Not that it matters much because AB is always open, but he'll be double covered all game with Ryan on him and McCourty helping over the top. That will leave some single coverage for DHB and Coates.
 
Actual football talk, nice. We are a bit thin in the Front 7 so I would expect a very heavy dosage of Bell/Williams. You still have a ton of playmakers on offense. Pound the ball consistently, hope to draw the defense in, then take some shots with DHB, Coates, and AB down field. I'd expect to see a lot of end arounds with your speedy receivers as well.

Not that it matters much because AB is always open, but he'll be double covered all game with Ryan on him and McCourty helping over the top. That will leave some single coverage for DHB and Coates.

If you want to talk like this we will talk football. Other wise you can **** off for coming here to talk **** when were starting Landry.
 
If we run the wildcat they can't double team on the outside vs. either Brown or Coates.

They will adjust with 8 in the box, maybe 9 in the box and play very tight on the WR's on the outside to prevent Bell from throwing short, easy passes (and dare him to put some air under them).

But I kind of think if we practice with Bell all week throwing some 9-routes or back shoulder throws or even WR screens, that's all you need.
 
I noticed you didn't attach any graphs showing that their fumble rate last year was in line with recent history.

Also funny how you quickly dismiss simple chemistry. Then again, I wouldn't take you for a guy that knew about basic gases. I'm sure your tires stay just the same PSI in those cold winters down there. You should call up the dozens of institutes that did their own studies and found that NE's footballs (along with the Colts who ironically had 3 of the 4 balls they tested under the 12.5 PSI minimum) all fell into the expected range of the Ideal Gas Law. I'm sure they had much more to gain by doing this study than a company who has been proven to be hired guns (i.e. read up about Exponent claiming second hand smoke doesn't cause cancer. Let me know if you need any more lessons, I'm here all week!


the balls were tested at halftime, dipshit.

in the first half, Mr Wonderful was ******* atrocious. How bad was he? He completed 10 of 15 passes, with TWO of those completions to the Colts. He was also throwing short little bitchy dink and dunk passes. Why? because his long passes were picked off.

1st Interception:
3rd and 1 at NE 17

1st and 10 at NE 49

(3:09 - 1st) (Run formation) T.Brady pass deep middle intended for B.Tyms INTERCEPTED by M.Adams [E.Walden] at IND 6. M.Adams to IND 6 for no gain (B.Tyms)

2nd Interception:
3rd and 1 at NE 17

(1:25 - 2nd) (Run formation) C.Fleming reported in as eligible. T.Brady pass deep left intended for R.Gronkowski INTERCEPTED by M.Adams at NE 33. M.Adams to NE 23 for 10 yards (N.Solder)

Now, wonder what could have possibly changed in the 2nd half, when facts show it was 14-10 at the end of the 2nd quarter, to allow Mr. Bundchen to go 11-15 for two touchdowns?
 
If you want to talk like this we will talk football. Other wise you can **** off for coming here to talk **** when were starting Landry.

I'd talk **** if Ben was playing, too, so no worries there. After all, Brady is 8-2 against the Steelers :third:

Also, thanks for the avatar update! Really compliments his figure.
 
the balls were tested at halftime, dipshit.

in the first half, Mr Wonderful was ******* atrocious. How bad was he? He completed 10 of 15 passes, with TWO of those completions to the Colts. He was also throwing short little bitchy dink and dunk passes. Why? because his long passes were picked off.

1st Interception:
3rd and 1 at NE 17

1st and 10 at NE 49

(3:09 - 1st) (Run formation) T.Brady pass deep middle intended for B.Tyms INTERCEPTED by M.Adams [E.Walden] at IND 6. M.Adams to IND 6 for no gain (B.Tyms)

2nd Interception:
3rd and 1 at NE 17

(1:25 - 2nd) (Run formation) C.Fleming reported in as eligible. T.Brady pass deep left intended for R.Gronkowski INTERCEPTED by M.Adams at NE 33. M.Adams to NE 23 for 10 yards (N.Solder)

Now, wonder what could have possibly changed in the 2nd half, when facts show it was 14-10 at the end of the 2nd quarter, to allow Mr. Bundchen to go 11-15 for two touchdowns?

Oh my God. You do realize you're completing defeating your point, right? The balls were supposedly "underinflated" in the first half and when the officials took them into the locker room to test at the half, they pumped them back up to 13 PSI. (It should be noted that the NFL had zero idea about the ideal gas law and its effect on PSI). So why did Brady have a better second half playing with balls that were pumped back up?

Take a lap.
 
I'd talk **** if Ben was playing, too, so no worries there. After all, Brady is 8-2 against the Steelers :third:

Also, thanks for the avatar update! Really compliments his figure.

You're welcome. I figured you'd enjoy looking at his ****.
 
Oh my God. You do realize you're completing defeating your point, right? The balls were supposedly "underinflated" in the first half and when the officials took them into the locker room to test at the half, they pumped them back up to 13 PSI. (It should be noted that the NFL had zero idea about the ideal gas law and its effect on PSI). So why did Brady have a better second half playing with balls that were pumped back up?

Take a lap.
you're an idiot.
 
I kind of agree with the idea of pulling out the old Miami game where they beat the Patriots with the wild cat.

That might be our only hope. Get the running game going, control the clock. Maybe mix up the defense enough to slow down Brady for a series or two. No turnovers. Maybe win something like 27-24.

If Tomlin and Haley believe "next man up" with Landry Jones and expect to run the exact offense that Roethlisberger does, you are going to fail in a big way.

I'd take Jones off the field completely. Run a wildcat with Bell AND Williams. Double TE sets and try to pound it down their throats. They are thin in the front-7 right now anyhow. Man up on them and grind it out. I think Bell can throw enough to keep them honest on the outside because Brown is so good at getting separation one-on-one he's not like a small window to throw to. And on the other side, you can throw up jump balls for Coates.

I'd take my chance with that.

Have Bell run the wildcat with bootlegs to each side and running toward the LoS. Right before he gets hit, throw. Roughing the Passer, first down. Every. Play. If they let up, before he throws, kick in the gear. Win! win!
 
I am all messed up going into this week. It's like ESPN and the Nancy ****-boy League is hollaring "dead team walking" and we should just lay down at the Cheaters feet. We'll **** that...and **** them all. I have hope and I believe that this team has the pride to pull off something epic. They ARE the Pittsburgh ******* Steelers and that has to amount to something. If not, then let's just say **** it and cripple that ***** Bwady and deflate the football as we jam it up his pansy ***!
 
You can F Bomb the PATS all you want but it doesn't change the fact that we have a very injured team in critical areas that would struggle to beat ANY of the other 30 NFL teams this week. The the unfortunate part is the Patriots are the team we have to play this week.

F bomb away. Just words.

On a lighter side, I remember working in the steel miller during college summer break in 1970 and we had a guy that used the F bomb so much that our first helper decided to keep count of every word he said for @ an hour to see what percentage was the F bomb. It was nearly 50%! Seriously, I never knew there was so many variations of the F Bomb.:becky:
 
Top