• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

Ron Burgundy said:
Why do Liberals suddenly want to get into the military?
(I know, to get their sex change operations paid for.)
Click to expand...

It's also funny that after decades of paranoia the Left now finds themselves siding with the FBI and CIA.

 
The "left" is siding with all the weird and kinky stuff these days JonBoy

44625-Zuckerberg.jpg
 
(i) states how their respective agencies are complying with 8 U.S.C. 1611(a), which provides that an alien who is not a “qualified alien” as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1641 is, subject to certain statutorily defined exceptions, not eligible for any Federal public benefit as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1611(c);

(ii) provides a list of Federal benefit programs that their respective agencies administer that are restricted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1611; and

(iii) provides a list of Federal benefit programs that their respective agencies administer that are not restricted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1611.
Click to expand...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...rica-promoting-opportunity-economic-mobility/

Behind the scenes of all the Cohen and Syria media circus, this just happened a few days ago.
 
Now that this thread has been rudely interrupted by one members blatant capitalistic braggadocio and self-aggrandizing , can we get back to trump winning....we are closing in on record setting territory here and Tibsy ain't happy about it.

L5oDzyC.jpg


Oh yeah, remember the " not sending their best people " Trump quote ?

5sH0ouD.jpg
 
Maybe adding Gorsuch to the Supreme Court wasn't a bad thing after all. If he continues like this, I'll concede Trump nominating him can be listed as a rare accomplishment for the President. Of course we'll have to wait and see if this was a one-time moment of clarity for Gorsuch or the start of something big, namely that he won't rubber stamp Trump's misguided and half-baked policies.

Gorsuch votes with liberal wing of court to nix immigrant deportation rule
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/17/supreme-court-strikes-down-key-deportation-provision.html

Justice Neil Gorsuch provided the decisive vote Tuesday in a Supreme Court ruling striking down a key provision that made it easier to deport immigrants convicted of violent crimes, in a blow to the Trump administration.

President Trump's Supreme Court pick has largely sided with the conservative members of the bench since his appointment, but sided with the liberal wing on Tuesday.

The court said the part of the law in question is too vague to be enforced.

The court's 5-4 decision concerns a provision of federal immigration law that defines a "crime of violence." Conviction for a crime of violence subjects an immigrant to deportation and usually speeds up the process.

A federal appeals court in San Francisco previously struck down the provision as too vague, and on Monday the Supreme Court agreed. The appeals court based its ruling on a 2015 Supreme Court decision that struck down a similarly worded part of another federal law that imposes longer prison sentences on repeat criminals.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the 2015 decision "tells us how to resolve this case."

The decision is a loss for Trump's administration which, like President Barack Obama's administration before it, had defended the provision at issue before the Supreme Court. And it comes amid an ongoing focus on immigration by Trump.
Click to expand...
 
Tibs said:
Maybe adding Gorsuch to the Supreme Court wasn't a bad thing after all. If he continues like this, I'll concede Trump nominating him can be listed as a rare accomplishment for the President. Of course we'll have to wait and see if this was a one-time moment of clarity for Gorsuch or the start of something big, namely that he won't rubber stamp Trump's misguided and half-baked policies.

Gorsuch votes with liberal wing of court to nix immigrant deportation rule
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/17/supreme-court-strikes-down-key-deportation-provision.html
Click to expand...

Not a big deal. If the law is too vague, it's too vague. Introduce a bill that clearly addresses it. But it's nice to know that you want convicted violent criminals to be protected. (WTF?) And while you're strutting around with spastic nipples over this, you must have missed the part where Obama had the same stance as Trump. Doh!
 
For the record, Scalia didn't like this law for the same reasons.

And don't interpret ruling against this case was left-leaning. If anything, Gorsuch's dissent was done because he's a HARD right-leaning justice for right-leaning reasons. Just because in this case it overlapped with the left-leaning justices (who voted against it for liberal reasons), doesn't make Gorsuch all of a sudden liberal. Just free thinking (which further proves what a good selection he is).
 
deljzc said:
For the record, Scalia didn't like this law for the same reasons.

And don't interpret ruling against this case was left-leaning. If anything, Gorsuch's dissent was done because he's a HARD right-leaning justice for right-leaning reasons. Just because in this case it overlapped with the left-leaning justices (who voted against it for liberal reasons), doesn't make Gorsuch all of a sudden liberal. Just free thinking (which further proves what a good selection he is).
Click to expand...

zf1vMwO.jpg
 
It's over!

more winning!


Rosenstein assured Trump he is not a target of any part of Mueller probe

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told President Trump last week at the White House that he "isn't a target of any part" of the Mueller probe, Bloomberg reports, citing two people familiar with the matter. CNN is reporting separately that Rosenstein told Trump "that he's not a target in the investigation of his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen," specifically.

https://www.axios.com/rod-rosenstei...ion-571386a7-4443-4c5c-a412-5b891ec546c1.html
 
Spike said:
It's over! more winning! Rosenstein assured Trump he is not a target of any part of Mueller probe
Click to expand...

That's a spit-laugh reaction that you think this is 'more winning' or helping Trump in any way. This buys Rosenstein more time to hang around and takes the air out of Trump's sail to fire him. They're toying with Trump at this point. Maybe Giuliani will help lessen the damage, but the cat's out of the bag. This is a pigs slipping on ice moment for Trump, not sure how he's gonna reel this back in.

pigchase.gif
 
Last edited:
Rudy G can help. He knows the people out to get Trump, and is a media star, meaning news media channels struggling for ratings might actually give him air time.
 
ha ha - even more insights of a doomed campaign


‘MAXIMIZE TRUMP’
Hillary Clinton on Election Night: ‘They Were Never Going to Let Me Be President’

A new book from Amy Chozick has revelations and rumors about a doomed campaign

Chozick writes that the Clinton campaign, which she covered from the beginning, had reacted furiously to the prospect of a Joe Biden run, as floated first in an August 2015 Maureen Dowd Times column and then in a reported story by Chozick. In the book, she writes that “Biden had confided (off the record) to the White House press corps that he wanted to run, but he added something like ‘You guys don’t understand these people. The Clintons will try to destroy me.’”

From early on, the Clinton camp saw Trump as an enemy to encourage, Chozick writes. During the campaign, as had been previously reported, there was an effort to elevate Trump into a so-called Pied Piper in order to tie him to the mainstream of the Republican Party.

“An agenda for an upcoming campaign meeting sent by [Campaign Manager] Robby Mook’s office asked, ‘How do we maximize Trump?’” Chozick writes, describing a time when the GOP primary was still crowded.

Even as Trump surged in the polls, the Clinton camp still saw him as a danger to stronger candidates rather than such a candidate in his own right, Chozick reports, so that in August 2015, “when the main GOP debate came on, everyone pushed their pizza crust aside and stared transfixed at the TV set… [Campaign Manager] Robby [Mook] salivated when the debate came back on and Trump started to speak. ‘Shhhhh,’ Robby said, practically pressing his nose up to the TV. ‘I’ve gahtz to get me some Trump.’ Robby thought Rubio would be the nominee. Podesta was bullish on Kasich.

Bill and Hillary, still stuck in the 1990s, feared the Bush surname most of all.”

By the time of the conventions, though, as Trump was selected as the Republican nominee, the Clinton campaign was still trying to figure out how to improve her negative favorability ratings.

“A week earlier, she’d cut off Joel and the pollster John Anzalone, as they walked her through the almost daily reminder that half the country disliked her,” Chozick writes. “You know, I am getting pretty tired of hearing about how nobody likes me,” she said.

“‘Oh, what’s the point? They’re never going to like me,’ Hillary told this friend.”

That sense of resignation about the candidate’s limitations infected her campaign, writes Chozick

“The Deplorables always got a laugh, over living-room chats in the Hamptons, at dinner parties under the stars on Martha’s Vineyard, over passed hors d’oeuvres in Beverly Hills, and during sunset cocktails in Silicon Valley,” Chozick continues.

“‘I really messed up,’ [Clinton] told aides that night,” Chozick writes of the evening when the candidate’s Deplorables shtick went public.

On the night of the election, Chozick describes a dejected Clinton when she was told by campaign staffers that it was over.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/hillary-clinton-they-were-never-going-to-let-me-be-president?ref=home
 
WINNING!


Senate Confirms Climate Change Denier To Lead NASA

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday narrowly confirmed Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.), a former Navy pilot with no scientific credentials and who doesn’t believe humans are primarily to blame for the global climate crisis, to lead NASA.

Bridenstine will become the first elected official to hold the NASA administrator job. He joins a Cabinet already loaded with people who question that climate change is real and that human activity is the primary cause.

The final vote ― which was 50-49 along party lines ― came one day after the Senate narrowly advanced Bridenstine’s nomination, thanks to an about-face from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and a key vote from Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.). Rubio, who in September told Politico that he worried about Bridenstine’s nomination “could be devastating for the space program,” said in a statement Wednesday that he decided to support the nominee in order to avoid “a gaping leadership void” at NASA.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jim-bridenstine-nasa-confirmation_us_5ad8aab7e4b03c426dac081c


---------------------------------------

DbKs21cW4AE8xzN.jpg
 
Coach said:
Rudy G can help. He knows the people out to get Trump, and is a media star, meaning news media channels struggling for ratings might actually give him air time.
Click to expand...

Hopefully its a stepping stone to AG. He should've had that position from the start. Sessions sucks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top