The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
are you seriously in such denial that you refuse to believe that Hillary's ******* campaign started all this Russia ****? really?
As George Carlin once said, "They're all in the same club and you ain't in it. The GOP doesn't seriously go after Democrats when they're in charge in order to keep Democrats from seriously going after Republicans when they're in charge. Remember all the screaming the Dems did about the hated Boosh, a lot of that was because they were pissed about Clinton being impeached, but they never brought a single charge. Just the same, when they impeached Clinton the GOP stopped there and didn't seek further penalties or remove him from office.
For better or worse, our government stops short of charging previous Presidents with crimes. Pretty soon you will arrive at banana republic status if you do that. Any number of things Hildebeast should have gone to jail for (Whitewater, CattleGate (Martha Stewart went to jail for less), Vince Foster), and they will NEVER charge The First Black President with anything. Simply isn't going to happen.
That's why I've always said that Bomma is the first Affirmative Action President. Not because He's (half) black but because He is held to a lower standard because of His skin color.
RINO swamp creatures.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,300
- Reaction score
- 19,399
- Points
- 113
I don't know. The left seems to awfully worried about the confederacy these days. I mean, how long ago was that?Just sayin.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,300
- Reaction score
- 19,399
- Points
- 113
Personally speaking, I think the reason the two sides don't go after each other is to ensure that no one knows how complicit they are in the same ****.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 1,022
- Reaction score
- 585
- Points
- 113
Actually it's more like the establishment -- career politicians -- on both sides of the aisle are more interested in serving THEIR collective interests, rather than the interests of the average American.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 5,838
- Reaction score
- 4,788
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Taking back the courts
Senate approves Trump nominee to serve as judge
The Senate has confirmed another of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees.
The Senate by a vote of 84-10 confirmed Trevor McFadden of Virginia to serve as a judge on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
McFadden has served in the Trump administration as a deputy assistant attorney general. He is the ninth judicial nominee of Trump's presidency to win confirmation.
President Donald Trump is having more success getting judges confirmed than Democrat Barack Obama did at this early stage in their presidencies.
That disparity is expected to increase this week as the GOP-led Senate pushes through more of Trump's choices.
The Senate will next turn its attention to the appellate courts. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has teed up votes this week for four more judicial nominees.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/30/latest-cornyn-differs-with-moore-on-muslims-in-congress.html
Senate approves Trump nominee to serve as judge
The Senate has confirmed another of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees.
The Senate by a vote of 84-10 confirmed Trevor McFadden of Virginia to serve as a judge on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
McFadden has served in the Trump administration as a deputy assistant attorney general. He is the ninth judicial nominee of Trump's presidency to win confirmation.
President Donald Trump is having more success getting judges confirmed than Democrat Barack Obama did at this early stage in their presidencies.
That disparity is expected to increase this week as the GOP-led Senate pushes through more of Trump's choices.
The Senate will next turn its attention to the appellate courts. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has teed up votes this week for four more judicial nominees.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/30/latest-cornyn-differs-with-moore-on-muslims-in-congress.html
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
HAPPY HALLOWEEN FROM THE WHITE HOUSE
Wishing everyone a safe and Happy Halloween!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
Wishing everyone a safe and Happy Halloween!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
WINNING!
EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Bars Government-Funded Science Advisers From Panels
The nation’s top environmental protection official signed a directive Tuesday aimed at preventing conflicts of interest while bolstering the independence and integrity of scientists who advise the government.
Under the new policy announced by Scott Pruitt, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, researchers and scientists who currently receive grants from the agency are not eligible to fill open slots on three science advisory groups.
“Whatever science comes out of EPA shouldn’t be political science,” Pruitt, appointed by President Donald Trump, told reporters during a press conference at EPA headquarters in Washington.
“From this day forward, EPA advisory committee members will be financially independent from the agency.”
Otherwise qualified applicants, including those from parts of the country seen as excluded from public service under the Obama administration, will have a leg up as the EPA changes under the Trump administration.
The remarks by Pruitt, former attorney general of Oklahoma, focused on three major panels among the EPA’s 22 advisory committees.
In the past three years, members of the Science Advisory Board, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, and the Board of Scientific Counselors received about $77 million in direct EPA grants while serving, according to agency calculations.
http://dailysignal.com/2017/10/31/e...government-paid-science-advisers-from-panels/
EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Bars Government-Funded Science Advisers From Panels
The nation’s top environmental protection official signed a directive Tuesday aimed at preventing conflicts of interest while bolstering the independence and integrity of scientists who advise the government.
Under the new policy announced by Scott Pruitt, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, researchers and scientists who currently receive grants from the agency are not eligible to fill open slots on three science advisory groups.
“Whatever science comes out of EPA shouldn’t be political science,” Pruitt, appointed by President Donald Trump, told reporters during a press conference at EPA headquarters in Washington.
“From this day forward, EPA advisory committee members will be financially independent from the agency.”
Otherwise qualified applicants, including those from parts of the country seen as excluded from public service under the Obama administration, will have a leg up as the EPA changes under the Trump administration.
The remarks by Pruitt, former attorney general of Oklahoma, focused on three major panels among the EPA’s 22 advisory committees.
In the past three years, members of the Science Advisory Board, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, and the Board of Scientific Counselors received about $77 million in direct EPA grants while serving, according to agency calculations.
http://dailysignal.com/2017/10/31/e...government-paid-science-advisers-from-panels/
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Nikki Haley tells United Nations: You're not the boss of U.S.
Ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the United Nations Wednesday in a defiant speech to the 193-member General Assembly before it adopted a resolution calling for an end to the U.S. economic embargo on Cuba.
Haley called the long-standing debate “political theater.”
“Let’s be honest about what we really see going on here,” Haley said. “This assembly does not have the power to end the U.S. embargo. It is based in U.S. law, which only the United States Congress can change.”
The United States voted Wednesday against the U.N. resolution condemning the American trade embargo against Cuba after abstaining last year, during the administration of Barack Obama, for the first time in 25 years.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article182180446.html
Ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the United Nations Wednesday in a defiant speech to the 193-member General Assembly before it adopted a resolution calling for an end to the U.S. economic embargo on Cuba.
Haley called the long-standing debate “political theater.”
“Let’s be honest about what we really see going on here,” Haley said. “This assembly does not have the power to end the U.S. embargo. It is based in U.S. law, which only the United States Congress can change.”
The United States voted Wednesday against the U.N. resolution condemning the American trade embargo against Cuba after abstaining last year, during the administration of Barack Obama, for the first time in 25 years.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article182180446.html
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 831
- Points
- 113
If all our politicians are so corrupt, why do American citizens keep electing them?. Maybe the American people need to be tried and convicted.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Hillary was corrupt - but fortunately Americans could see right through her
Donna Brazile admits Clinton campaign rigged the DNC against Bernie
RIGGED: Donna Brazile Claims Team Clinton Bought Off DNC
In a blistering piece in POLITICO published early Thursday morning, former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Donna Brazile eviscerates her predecessor, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and accuses Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of rigging the primary process against Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
Brazile writes that when she took over the DNC — after Wasserman Schultz was forced to resign — she promised the progressive Democratic challenger Sanders that she'd "get to the bottom" of allegations that Clinton had stacked the deck inside the DNC.
Brazile says she "followed the money," through Wasserman Schultz and straight to Clinton, whom Brazile alleges "bought" the DNC before she was ever declared the party's official candidate. Clinton financed the DNC and used her influence with Wasserman Schultz to curb the party's spending, making the DNC entirely dependent on Clinton's campaign and fundraising efforts — and cutting any challengers out of the picture.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/23070/rigged-former-dnc-chair-donna-brazile-accuses-emily-zanotti
Donna Brazile admits Clinton campaign rigged the DNC against Bernie
RIGGED: Donna Brazile Claims Team Clinton Bought Off DNC
In a blistering piece in POLITICO published early Thursday morning, former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Donna Brazile eviscerates her predecessor, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and accuses Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of rigging the primary process against Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
Brazile writes that when she took over the DNC — after Wasserman Schultz was forced to resign — she promised the progressive Democratic challenger Sanders that she'd "get to the bottom" of allegations that Clinton had stacked the deck inside the DNC.
Brazile says she "followed the money," through Wasserman Schultz and straight to Clinton, whom Brazile alleges "bought" the DNC before she was ever declared the party's official candidate. Clinton financed the DNC and used her influence with Wasserman Schultz to curb the party's spending, making the DNC entirely dependent on Clinton's campaign and fundraising efforts — and cutting any challengers out of the picture.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/23070/rigged-former-dnc-chair-donna-brazile-accuses-emily-zanotti
Nikki Haley tells United Nations: You're not the boss of U.S.
Ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the United Nations Wednesday in a defiant speech to the 193-member General Assembly before it adopted a resolution calling for an end to the U.S. economic embargo on Cuba.
Haley called the long-standing debate “political theater.”
“Let’s be honest about what we really see going on here,” Haley said. “This assembly does not have the power to end the U.S. embargo. It is based in U.S. law, which only the United States Congress can change.”
The United States voted Wednesday against the U.N. resolution condemning the American trade embargo against Cuba after abstaining last year, during the administration of Barack Obama, for the first time in 25 years.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article182180446.html
Nikki--hit all day. Might have to go rub one out for patriotism.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
More WINNING
Senate confirms two more federal judges, bringing total to five this week
The Senate confirmed two more appeals court picks Thursday, closing out a week that saw them devote all their time to filling the federal judiciary with President Trump’s nominees.
Including the two latest picks, they confirmed four circuit judges and one district judge this week — overcoming Democratic filibuster attempts for each.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/2/senate-confirms-two-more-federal-judges/
Senate confirms two more federal judges, bringing total to five this week
The Senate confirmed two more appeals court picks Thursday, closing out a week that saw them devote all their time to filling the federal judiciary with President Trump’s nominees.
Including the two latest picks, they confirmed four circuit judges and one district judge this week — overcoming Democratic filibuster attempts for each.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/2/senate-confirms-two-more-federal-judges/
Infatuation? Learn the word's definition.
How about "disdain" ..and it certainly wouldn't be mind numbing.
The only ones infatuated by Hillary were all those libtard crybabies on election night.
Unemployment is at the lowest rate in 17 years!
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hiring-rebounds-in-october-unemployment-rate-falls-to-4-1-1509712307
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hiring-rebounds-in-october-unemployment-rate-falls-to-4-1-1509712307
Sorry to be a day late on this, but I just wanted to comment that Obama was hip deep in this as well. Do I have proof? No, I only have what I saw with my own eyes. After Bernie came close to upsetting Clinton in CA Obama called Sanders into the White House. I don't know which news agency it was but someone had their cameras rolling when the meeting ended and those two came walking out. Obama looked a little more smug than usual which we all know is EXTREMELY smug but also had his brows knitted as though he was pissed and Bernie? Bernie literally looked like he had been worked over with a rubber hose, with only his clothing concealing the beating he received. If the DNC used a fair process to pick a candidate what in the hell happened there? Well the simplest explanation is Obama told Bernie he was not receiving the nomination no matter what and he needed to back off campaigning and support Hillary. Bernie wasn't having any of it at first but was semi-literally beaten into submission. They will never tell you this but they new Bernie would have taken the country in directions they didn't want. Oh "they" BTW are the Clintons, the Obamas, the Bushes, the Rothchilds. You all do realize that if Clinton was elected it would have meant that only (3) families held the most powerful seat in the free world for (3) DECADES? And if HRC made it in next up would have been Michelle Obama......then Chelsea Clinton. Anyway historians will look back at 11/8/16 as a bloodless coup.
The Left and MSM never ceases to amaze me and make me laugh. Here's their latest semi-brain dead moment:
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...h-penalty-for-already-dead-vegas-shooter.html
MSNBC's Eli Stokols mad Trump didn't want death penalty for already dead Vegas shooter
By Brian Flood | Fox News
Wall Street Journal reporter and MSNBC contributor Eli Stokols is upset that President Trump called for the death penalty when discussing New York City terrorist Sayfullo Saipov but didn’t mention the death penalty when discussing the already-dead Las Vegas shooter.
“The unifying thread is sort of the broad politics of Donald Trump, the ethno-centric nationalism. He did not react this way when a white person shot dozens of people in Las Vegas… We need to give this guy the death penalty,” Eli Stokols told MSNBC host Nicole Wallace.
Wallace didn’t mention that the Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock, is already dead.
Trump took to Twitter to condemn Saipov after he killed eight people on Tuesday in lower Manhattan in what is being described as a terror attack. Saipov reportedly wanted to fly an ISIS flag in his hospital room and "wanted to kill as many people as he could," according to a federal criminal complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
“NYC terrorist was happy as he asked to hang ISIS flag in his hospital room,” Trump tweeted. “He killed 8 people, badly injured 12. SHOULD GET DEATH PENALTY!”
Donald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump
NYC terrorist was happy as he asked to hang ISIS flag in his hospital room. He killed 8 people, badly injured 12. SHOULD GET DEATH PENALTY!
11:43 PM - Nov 1, 2017
While both attacks are tragic and horrifying, Stokols attempted to paint Trump as someone who is harder on an ISIS-affiliated terrorist than a deranged white man who gunned down fellow Americans. Paddock opened fire on a country music festival in Las Vegas last month, killing 58 people and injuring over 500 more, in what is the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history.
The problem for Stokols is that Paddock was killed by suicide as police closed in on his Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino hotel room. Since he’s dead, he’s obviously not a candidate for the death penalty – making the MSNBC correspondent’s point essentially meaningless.
Trump did refer to Paddock “demented” and a “very sick individual,” so it’s not like the President spoke kindly about him. He simply didn’t call for the death penalty… because you can’t kill someone who is already dead.
The Gateway Pundit called Stokols “moronic,” while the Media Research Center said the Wall Street Journal needs to “needs to better police the people that it has in important positions… if it wants people to take its journalism seriously.”
Stokols issued the following comment to Fox News: “I am aware the Vegas shooter is already dead; and I did not mean to sound critical of President Trump for failing to call for the death penalty in that case. I understand how ridiculous that sounds. I was making a broader point about the president’s responses to Las Vegas, where he did not push for a policy change, and Charlottesville, where he did not call for the death penalty after a driver crashed into a crowd, in comparison to his more emotionally charged rhetoric following the terrorist attack this week — calling to end the visa lottery, labeling the driver an ‘animal’ and urging for the death penalty. As I acknowledged Thursday night, I did not distinguish clearly enough between the different circumstances in my on-air remarks, which I regret."
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...h-penalty-for-already-dead-vegas-shooter.html
MSNBC's Eli Stokols mad Trump didn't want death penalty for already dead Vegas shooter
By Brian Flood | Fox News
Wall Street Journal reporter and MSNBC contributor Eli Stokols is upset that President Trump called for the death penalty when discussing New York City terrorist Sayfullo Saipov but didn’t mention the death penalty when discussing the already-dead Las Vegas shooter.
“The unifying thread is sort of the broad politics of Donald Trump, the ethno-centric nationalism. He did not react this way when a white person shot dozens of people in Las Vegas… We need to give this guy the death penalty,” Eli Stokols told MSNBC host Nicole Wallace.
Wallace didn’t mention that the Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock, is already dead.
Trump took to Twitter to condemn Saipov after he killed eight people on Tuesday in lower Manhattan in what is being described as a terror attack. Saipov reportedly wanted to fly an ISIS flag in his hospital room and "wanted to kill as many people as he could," according to a federal criminal complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
“NYC terrorist was happy as he asked to hang ISIS flag in his hospital room,” Trump tweeted. “He killed 8 people, badly injured 12. SHOULD GET DEATH PENALTY!”
Donald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump
NYC terrorist was happy as he asked to hang ISIS flag in his hospital room. He killed 8 people, badly injured 12. SHOULD GET DEATH PENALTY!
11:43 PM - Nov 1, 2017
While both attacks are tragic and horrifying, Stokols attempted to paint Trump as someone who is harder on an ISIS-affiliated terrorist than a deranged white man who gunned down fellow Americans. Paddock opened fire on a country music festival in Las Vegas last month, killing 58 people and injuring over 500 more, in what is the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history.
The problem for Stokols is that Paddock was killed by suicide as police closed in on his Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino hotel room. Since he’s dead, he’s obviously not a candidate for the death penalty – making the MSNBC correspondent’s point essentially meaningless.
Trump did refer to Paddock “demented” and a “very sick individual,” so it’s not like the President spoke kindly about him. He simply didn’t call for the death penalty… because you can’t kill someone who is already dead.
The Gateway Pundit called Stokols “moronic,” while the Media Research Center said the Wall Street Journal needs to “needs to better police the people that it has in important positions… if it wants people to take its journalism seriously.”
Stokols issued the following comment to Fox News: “I am aware the Vegas shooter is already dead; and I did not mean to sound critical of President Trump for failing to call for the death penalty in that case. I understand how ridiculous that sounds. I was making a broader point about the president’s responses to Las Vegas, where he did not push for a policy change, and Charlottesville, where he did not call for the death penalty after a driver crashed into a crowd, in comparison to his more emotionally charged rhetoric following the terrorist attack this week — calling to end the visa lottery, labeling the driver an ‘animal’ and urging for the death penalty. As I acknowledged Thursday night, I did not distinguish clearly enough between the different circumstances in my on-air remarks, which I regret."
Here ya go Tibsy, you can now update the Hungarian dictionary with the real meaning of infatuation.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 5,838
- Reaction score
- 4,788
- Points
- 113
Hilarious! Thanks Tibs, I love this stuff! I confess I still log onto to CNN and MSN once every day at work and giggle like a kid all the way through the political sections (which is 2/3 of their page) at how sad and miserable the tone is. I ******* eat that **** up with a spoon. The feeling of pathetically, desperate hope that they can possibly nail Trump with something.....anything is so over the top. It bleeds and seeps out of every single article like an infection. When something does actually happen that they can paint Trump in an even more negative light, like one of his silly tweets, you can tell that every single reporter on staff runs to their computer, drops their pants and jerks/rubs themselves off in ecstasy as they type their apocalyptic diatribe. It's comedy gold.
Let's face it, CNN's company motto at the top of their web page ought to read - CNN: We are ******* miserable. Usually all I have to do is read the headlines to start cracking up.....the articles are pretty much unnecessary. The ******* end of the world comes every single day for these people. Then the next morning they have to get up and suffer through it all over again. It's beautiful and I hope they get to do it another 7 years or so. Then after Trump is gone, I hope the American people elect someone they despise even more than Trump. I wonder how many years of that it would take for most of these outlets to become trustworthy and reputable news organizations? Hopefully we'll get to find out.
Let's face it, CNN's company motto at the top of their web page ought to read - CNN: We are ******* miserable. Usually all I have to do is read the headlines to start cracking up.....the articles are pretty much unnecessary. The ******* end of the world comes every single day for these people. Then the next morning they have to get up and suffer through it all over again. It's beautiful and I hope they get to do it another 7 years or so. Then after Trump is gone, I hope the American people elect someone they despise even more than Trump. I wonder how many years of that it would take for most of these outlets to become trustworthy and reputable news organizations? Hopefully we'll get to find out.
Last edited: