The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 4,795
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 831
- Points
- 113
Your "winning" seems to equal my "bumbling". I thought Bush would be the worse President of my lifetime and now I've been proven wrong.
#winning
Attachments
your "writing a book" seems to equal my "not doing a ******* thing but bitching and whining".
Yer righting a book? Gud Lawd I's hope youz gotz urself a dam gud pruf reeder.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 4,795
- Points
- 113
Other than the constant bitching from establishment, inside-the-beltway entities, I continue to give Trump extremely high grades on what is actually HAPPENING in the real world.
The economy continues to improve.
Immigration is being enforced, illegals are being deported, and attempts to enter illegally are way down.
Foreign relations are understandably tense since America/Trump is refusing to foot the bill for the free world at every turn while they take advantage of our costly military protection. I don't put any stock (in fact I like it) that Euro-socialists are upset at Trump. That tells me he's doing his job.
Trade relationships with Asia are headed in the right way. Same with NAFTA and trade with Mexico/Americas.
The court system in America is entering a golden age of conservatism and traditional constitutional law instead of "broad interpretations" and legislation from the bench.
He continues to pound away at federal COSTS and overall size, demanding reductions and spending freezes on almost every department he has control over.
This cost savings extends to a re-examination of Obamacare as a federal necessity considering it's exploding costs and lack of competition.
He is standing up for police, the rule of law, and military families. Simple concepts that seem to have been eroded under Obama.
He is pushing on major tax reform, which should have been on every President's first year agenda since Clinton (Trump might be the first to actually do something instead of those phonies).
I don't really know what I'm supposed to be unhappy about. Other than my continued hatred and frustration at senators/congressman that have been there for 20+ years.
The economy continues to improve.
Immigration is being enforced, illegals are being deported, and attempts to enter illegally are way down.
Foreign relations are understandably tense since America/Trump is refusing to foot the bill for the free world at every turn while they take advantage of our costly military protection. I don't put any stock (in fact I like it) that Euro-socialists are upset at Trump. That tells me he's doing his job.
Trade relationships with Asia are headed in the right way. Same with NAFTA and trade with Mexico/Americas.
The court system in America is entering a golden age of conservatism and traditional constitutional law instead of "broad interpretations" and legislation from the bench.
He continues to pound away at federal COSTS and overall size, demanding reductions and spending freezes on almost every department he has control over.
This cost savings extends to a re-examination of Obamacare as a federal necessity considering it's exploding costs and lack of competition.
He is standing up for police, the rule of law, and military families. Simple concepts that seem to have been eroded under Obama.
He is pushing on major tax reform, which should have been on every President's first year agenda since Clinton (Trump might be the first to actually do something instead of those phonies).
I don't really know what I'm supposed to be unhappy about. Other than my continued hatred and frustration at senators/congressman that have been there for 20+ years.
This, in itself, tells me he is on the right track.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 5,975
- Reaction score
- 13,614
- Points
- 113
He gunna win da pull-it-sir
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,392
- Reaction score
- 14,848
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
You are one hundred percent right for once, Obama was worse. That is what you meant isn't it?
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
BWAhahahahaha
It's all over but the crying
Bernie Sanders : 'Democratic brand is pretty bad'
(CNN)Sen. Bernie Sanders said Thursday he agreed with Democratic congressman Tim Ryan's claim that the Democratic brand is worse than President Donald Trump's in some parts of the country.
Democratic lawmaker: Pelosi is worse than Trump in some areas of the country
"I speak as the longest serving independent in American congressional history, the Democratic brand is pretty bad," Sanders told CNN's Anderson Cooper on "AC360."
Democrats need to "make it clear to working people of this country that the Democratic Party is on their side," Sanders exclaimed. "The Democrats need a progressive agenda. They need to rebuild the party in states they have ignored for decades, where they have almost no presence right now and create a 50-state party."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/23/polit...ic-brand-bad-anderson-cooper-cnntv/index.html
-----------------------------
Run Left Dems, Run Left!
hahahahahahaha
It's all over but the crying
Bernie Sanders : 'Democratic brand is pretty bad'
(CNN)Sen. Bernie Sanders said Thursday he agreed with Democratic congressman Tim Ryan's claim that the Democratic brand is worse than President Donald Trump's in some parts of the country.
Democratic lawmaker: Pelosi is worse than Trump in some areas of the country
"I speak as the longest serving independent in American congressional history, the Democratic brand is pretty bad," Sanders told CNN's Anderson Cooper on "AC360."
Democrats need to "make it clear to working people of this country that the Democratic Party is on their side," Sanders exclaimed. "The Democrats need a progressive agenda. They need to rebuild the party in states they have ignored for decades, where they have almost no presence right now and create a 50-state party."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/23/polit...ic-brand-bad-anderson-cooper-cnntv/index.html
-----------------------------
Run Left Dems, Run Left!
hahahahahahaha
The Dems have drifted too far left, and have lost the center left. The problem is, they elected too many lefties, and they are at a loss as to what to do.
Winning. Trump has brought the fight to our corrupt media, and now we are fighting back. May she win!
-------------------------------------------
Sarah Palin sues NY Times over editorial tying her to Giffords shooting
Former Alaska Governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin filed a lawsuit against the New York Times Tuesday over an editorial that tied her to the January 2011 shooting of an Arizona congresswoman.
Palin's attorneys claim the paper defamed her in the June 14 editorial, published hours after House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., was shot and wounded by a deranged man while Scalise was practicing with the GOP's baseball team in Alexandria, Va.
"We have not reviewed the claim yet but will defend against any claim vigorously," New York Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha told Fox News.
Palin is being represented by Kenneth Turkel, Shane Vogt and S. Preston Ricardo in the suit. Turkel and Vogt were part of the team that secured Hulk Hogan a $115 million award at trial from Gawker Media Group. Gawker appealed, but the two sides eventually settled for $31 million and Gawker and its founder, Nick Denton, were forced to file for bankruptcy.
We published an editorial last night on the shooting at the G.O.P. men's baseball team practice field in Alexandria.
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 15, 2017
We're sorry about this and we appreciate that our readers called us on the mistake. We've corrected the editorial. https://t.co/t1FZ3iEYQJ pic.twitter.com/k7WW5uJIQO
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 15, 2017
The editorial, attributed to The Times' editorial board and titled "America's Lethal Politics," initially linked Palin's rhetoric to the shooting that killed six people and wounded 13 others, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
The paper posted a correction the next day admitting that "no such link was established."
The editorial also claimed, incorrectly, that a now-infamous ad from Palin's political action committee put "Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs[sic]." The Times also corrected that statement, admitting that the crosshairs on the map targeted "electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers."
"The Times used its false assertion about Mrs. Palin as an artifice to exploit the [Scalise] shooting," Palin's attorneys stated in the suit.
"The Times published and promoted its Editorial Board's column despite knowing ... the false assertion that Mrs. Palin incited [Tucson shooter Jared] Loughner to murder six people," the suit added. "In doing so, the Times violated the law and its own policies."
Palin is seeking damages in an amount to be determined by a jury.
-------------------------------------------
Sarah Palin sues NY Times over editorial tying her to Giffords shooting
Former Alaska Governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin filed a lawsuit against the New York Times Tuesday over an editorial that tied her to the January 2011 shooting of an Arizona congresswoman.
Palin's attorneys claim the paper defamed her in the June 14 editorial, published hours after House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., was shot and wounded by a deranged man while Scalise was practicing with the GOP's baseball team in Alexandria, Va.
"We have not reviewed the claim yet but will defend against any claim vigorously," New York Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha told Fox News.
Palin is being represented by Kenneth Turkel, Shane Vogt and S. Preston Ricardo in the suit. Turkel and Vogt were part of the team that secured Hulk Hogan a $115 million award at trial from Gawker Media Group. Gawker appealed, but the two sides eventually settled for $31 million and Gawker and its founder, Nick Denton, were forced to file for bankruptcy.
We published an editorial last night on the shooting at the G.O.P. men's baseball team practice field in Alexandria.
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 15, 2017
We're sorry about this and we appreciate that our readers called us on the mistake. We've corrected the editorial. https://t.co/t1FZ3iEYQJ pic.twitter.com/k7WW5uJIQO
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 15, 2017
The editorial, attributed to The Times' editorial board and titled "America's Lethal Politics," initially linked Palin's rhetoric to the shooting that killed six people and wounded 13 others, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
The paper posted a correction the next day admitting that "no such link was established."
The editorial also claimed, incorrectly, that a now-infamous ad from Palin's political action committee put "Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs[sic]." The Times also corrected that statement, admitting that the crosshairs on the map targeted "electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers."
"The Times used its false assertion about Mrs. Palin as an artifice to exploit the [Scalise] shooting," Palin's attorneys stated in the suit.
"The Times published and promoted its Editorial Board's column despite knowing ... the false assertion that Mrs. Palin incited [Tucson shooter Jared] Loughner to murder six people," the suit added. "In doing so, the Times violated the law and its own policies."
Palin is seeking damages in an amount to be determined by a jury.
I believe this is what young kids today call a ***** slap, no?
-----------------------------------------------
CNN faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story
The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump’s — and forcing out the staffers responsible for it, The Post has learned.
The cable network’s coverage of Trump transition-team member Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner’s pending purchase by AT&T— and the widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can’t survive a merger.
CNN immediately caved after Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.
Scaramucci got an unusual public apology but still hired a top Manhattan lawyer to put further pressure on CNN and “look after [his] interests in this matter,” one source said.
-----------------------------------------------
CNN faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story
The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump’s — and forcing out the staffers responsible for it, The Post has learned.
The cable network’s coverage of Trump transition-team member Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner’s pending purchase by AT&T— and the widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can’t survive a merger.
CNN immediately caved after Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.
Scaramucci got an unusual public apology but still hired a top Manhattan lawyer to put further pressure on CNN and “look after [his] interests in this matter,” one source said.
You want me to build that wall. You need me to build that wall....
Looks like it's in the works. Great news.
------------------------------------------------
Trump administration plans border wall models in summer
The agency in charge of U.S. border security plans to start building prototypes for President Trump’s proposed wall with Mexico later this summer.
Ronald Vitiello, Customs and Border Protection’s acting deputy commissioner, said Tuesday that four to eight companies will get contracts for prototypes in San Diego that could be models for the roughly 2,000-mile border. Companies will have 30 days to complete the models.
Vitiello says it’s impractical to build a wall on about 130 miles of border where there are already natural barriers, like lakes or canyons.
Trump’s budget proposal for 2018 includes $1.6 billion for 74 miles of wall in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley and San Diego. There are currently 654 miles of fencing.
Earlier this month, Trump mentioned building the wall with solar panels.
“Think of it,” Trump told a crowd at a rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. “The higher it goes, the more valuable it is. Pretty good imagination, right?”
Trump has been criticized by some of his supports for what they see as a lack of attention to one of his key campaign promises. Construction has not begun and there has been resistance from Congress. The White House insists that the plan is on track.
Days after taking office on Jan. 20, Trump signed an executive order calling for a "physical wall along the southern border." But the order didn't include specific details or say how it would be funded or how much it might cost.
Looks like it's in the works. Great news.
------------------------------------------------
Trump administration plans border wall models in summer
The agency in charge of U.S. border security plans to start building prototypes for President Trump’s proposed wall with Mexico later this summer.
Ronald Vitiello, Customs and Border Protection’s acting deputy commissioner, said Tuesday that four to eight companies will get contracts for prototypes in San Diego that could be models for the roughly 2,000-mile border. Companies will have 30 days to complete the models.
Vitiello says it’s impractical to build a wall on about 130 miles of border where there are already natural barriers, like lakes or canyons.
Trump’s budget proposal for 2018 includes $1.6 billion for 74 miles of wall in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley and San Diego. There are currently 654 miles of fencing.
Earlier this month, Trump mentioned building the wall with solar panels.
“Think of it,” Trump told a crowd at a rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. “The higher it goes, the more valuable it is. Pretty good imagination, right?”
Trump has been criticized by some of his supports for what they see as a lack of attention to one of his key campaign promises. Construction has not begun and there has been resistance from Congress. The White House insists that the plan is on track.
Days after taking office on Jan. 20, Trump signed an executive order calling for a "physical wall along the southern border." But the order didn't include specific details or say how it would be funded or how much it might cost.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
oh noes!
Democrats Despair over Neil Gorsuch: ‘We’ve Got Another Scalia’
Democrats fume over early Gorsuch rulings
During his less than three months he has occupied late Justice Antonin Scalia's seat on the high court, Gorsuch is sending signals that he could be one of its most conservative jurists. He has often aligned himself with the judicial stalwarts of the right, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
"We've got another Scalia," declared Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/28/democrats-gorsuch-supreme-court-rulings-240030
--------------------------------
heh heh
Wait till they see the next two picks by President Trump!
Democrats Despair over Neil Gorsuch: ‘We’ve Got Another Scalia’
Democrats fume over early Gorsuch rulings
During his less than three months he has occupied late Justice Antonin Scalia's seat on the high court, Gorsuch is sending signals that he could be one of its most conservative jurists. He has often aligned himself with the judicial stalwarts of the right, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
"We've got another Scalia," declared Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/28/democrats-gorsuch-supreme-court-rulings-240030
--------------------------------
heh heh
Wait till they see the next two picks by President Trump!
Now they will lose too much support and money if they move toward the center.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 4,795
- Points
- 113
I still think their problem is they can't decide between the race-baiting, every minority is a victim, anti-white/anti-christian rhetoric and the ultra-white, euro-socialist ideologies. They are having a tough time merging those two platforms. Hard to sell "be like Norway" to latinos and blacks. Hard to sell "white privilege" to middle America.
And both platforms are probable too far left as well.
And both platforms are probable too far left as well.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Samsung Electric to open $380 million home appliance plant in U.S.
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd has agreed to open a $380 million home appliance manufacturing plant in South Carolina, the United States, it said on Wednesday.
The South Korean firm said this year it was in talks to build a home appliances plant in the United States amid worries about protectionist policies under U.S. President Donald Trump put pressure on global companies to generate jobs in the country.
In February, President Trump tweeted "Thank you, @samsung! We would love to have you!" in reference to the possibility of a new Samsung plant.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-samsung-elec-us-plant-idUSKBN19J1TM?il=0
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd has agreed to open a $380 million home appliance manufacturing plant in South Carolina, the United States, it said on Wednesday.
The South Korean firm said this year it was in talks to build a home appliances plant in the United States amid worries about protectionist policies under U.S. President Donald Trump put pressure on global companies to generate jobs in the country.
In February, President Trump tweeted "Thank you, @samsung! We would love to have you!" in reference to the possibility of a new Samsung plant.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-samsung-elec-us-plant-idUSKBN19J1TM?il=0
Funding to build a border wall was approved by Congress in 1996.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Ahhhhhh...life is good.
CNN Complains That White House Takes Questions From Conservatives
CNN reporter Jim Acosta complained Tuesday that White House deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was taking too many questions from conservatives.
CNN found itself in another scandal early Tuesday after the conservative group Project Veritas released an undercover video in which a health news producer for the network was recorded saying that CNN’s coverage of Trump-Russia connections was “mostly bullshit.”
Sanders asserted that the video was “a disgrace to all of media.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/27/c...ite-house-takes-questions-from-conservatives/
CNN Complains That White House Takes Questions From Conservatives
CNN reporter Jim Acosta complained Tuesday that White House deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was taking too many questions from conservatives.
CNN found itself in another scandal early Tuesday after the conservative group Project Veritas released an undercover video in which a health news producer for the network was recorded saying that CNN’s coverage of Trump-Russia connections was “mostly bullshit.”
Sanders asserted that the video was “a disgrace to all of media.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/27/c...ite-house-takes-questions-from-conservatives/
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
STEAMROLLING!
Republicans steamrolling Democrats to confirm Trump judicial nominees
While the media and Democrats are obsessed with increasingly bizarre Trump-Russia conspiracy theorie, an enormous change to the federal judiciary is well underway.
Liberal nightmare: Trump could appoint half federal judiciary. Yet Democrats, so blinded by the light of #TheResistance, appeared oblivious to the approaching Tsunami of Trump lower court nominations.
Today the first waves of the Trump judicial nomination tsunami hit the beaches in D.C.
Those ten nominees received mostly rave reviews
The second wave of conservative nominees landed on Wednesday ….
So it’s full steam ahead for nominees, damn the torpedoes and the obstruction of Democrats.
Liberals, who are still licking their Special Election wounds, don’t appear *woke* about what is happening.
They are too busy chasing Russian phantoms, insane conspiracy theories, and pumping millions of dollars and celebrity endorsements into failed virtue-signaling candidates
http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/0...ling-dems-to-confirm-trump-judicial-nominees/
Republicans steamrolling Democrats to confirm Trump judicial nominees
While the media and Democrats are obsessed with increasingly bizarre Trump-Russia conspiracy theorie, an enormous change to the federal judiciary is well underway.
Liberal nightmare: Trump could appoint half federal judiciary. Yet Democrats, so blinded by the light of #TheResistance, appeared oblivious to the approaching Tsunami of Trump lower court nominations.
Today the first waves of the Trump judicial nomination tsunami hit the beaches in D.C.
Those ten nominees received mostly rave reviews
The second wave of conservative nominees landed on Wednesday ….
So it’s full steam ahead for nominees, damn the torpedoes and the obstruction of Democrats.
Liberals, who are still licking their Special Election wounds, don’t appear *woke* about what is happening.
They are too busy chasing Russian phantoms, insane conspiracy theories, and pumping millions of dollars and celebrity endorsements into failed virtue-signaling candidates
http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/0...ling-dems-to-confirm-trump-judicial-nominees/