The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

[Tim Steelersfan]

$2-3 Million to fix the J6 Capitol damages, 1270 Americans convicted of federal charges.

$1-2 Billion in BLM damages, 120 federal convictions.

Would you please STOP injecting facts into the discussion!??

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Caught again jumping all over the place.

Yes, multiple individuals participating in or embedded within Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests recorded themselves committing acts of property destruction, arson, and violence. These self-recorded videos and livestreams were subsequently used by local and federal law enforcement to identify, arrest, and convict them.

Not only that, every MSM outlet and tens of thousands of individuals caught it on camera and shared it on the news and social media.

SMDH

 

[jitter77]

Anyone involved in vandalism should be prosecuted properly whether it is BLM, J6, the pool etc etc.... They are all separate instances and comparing them just resorts to whataboutism. In the Hearn case it's was clear they had no real evidence. They had him on camera and he was not in / near the water long enough among other things. Anyone involved in the phony prosecution should be looked at. For trump to keep up the charade after this "new" evidence along with the fact there was no evidence of gashes after draining the pool is comical. If Trump had just said from the get go that we tried an experimental procedure on the pool and it didn't work out, that would have been the end of it. I don't know if he is trying to create a false narrative for distraction, ego, or if he is really that delusional. He does seems to be getting wilder and more erratic with his remarks in general which doesn't bode well for the final couple years. I just hope he doesn't damage the party where the repubs can't win because I can't imagine the dems putting out a good candidate.

 

[Troglodyte]

Yes, it demonstrably IS. You cannot be this uneducated....wait.

The Congressional Research Service (which provides legal analysis to Congress) states: "Mere suspicion is not enough to satisfy this standard, but probable cause requires less than evidence which would justify a conviction." -- https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/HTML/R46601.html

The Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School explains that probable cause exists when the facts would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed and notes that it is a lower standard than what is required at trial.-- https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/probable_cause

"Probable cause is more than reasonable suspicion but much less than beyond a reasonable doubt." -- https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/legal-standards-proof.html

"One reason charges are sometimes dropped after an arrest - the police may have had enough evidence to establish probable cause at the time of the arrest, but prosecutors later decide that the evidence is not strong enough to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."



OK, you are this stupid. Yes, due to the low standards with probable cause, you CAN be arrested and charged. For someone who believes oneself to be so brilliant, it's a surprise you don't leverage AI before spouting off your stupidity.

View attachment 18025



Re-read everything posted above. Then read it 3 more times. Then do some research.

You can send $19.95 for the education to TimIsFlogsDaddy@venmo

What part of mere suspicion is not enough didn’t you understand?

Who’s right, Pirro or Trump?