The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

[Tim Steelersfan]

OMG - more Blue Oyster Cult. This video is epic lol (sorry it won't embed)

https://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2025/10/03/1751142141360652056/1024x576_MP4_1751142141360652056.mp4

 

[Superman]

 

[stillwright]

https://x.com/xerias_x/status/1974117304767275047?t=TMRKd0jO9OM375t0kvvsEQ&s=19

 

[stillwright]

TPUSA halftime show....

https://x.com/1109Patricia/status/1974039170088636734?t=4ciQ_vZVnxdSHisNW-XYrw&s=19

 

[Troglodyte]

Nothing good normally ever comes after "trust me" this is no exception. Just another partisan shill with an axe to grind.

Does that go for Trump? Go on record.

And what military rank did you achieve? Thoughts so.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

I'll start.
Seaman, E-3. Proudly served on a PBR in the brown water Navy 1969-1971
Your turn Flog. Thought so.

 

[SteelerInLebanon]

I'll start.
Seaman, E-3. Proudly served on a PBR in the brown water Navy 1969-1971
Your turn Flog. Thought so.

Flogs uniform is a Brown shirt he wore in Biden's Corvid snitch service.

 

[speedicut]

Does that go for Trump? Go on record.

And what military rank did you achieve? Thoughts so.

Franco's Italian Army 1974-1980

 

[speedicut]

Franco's Italian Army 1974-1980

Funny true story..
When I came down to Alabama I watched a Steeler game ( MNF I think) with this girl and she said ' why is it Franco's Italian Army when Frank O'Harris is obviously Irish? "

 

[Sarge]

I laugh at this idea that a person can’t be critical of a military leader if they didn’t serve, or can’t talk about a subject if they don’t have a college degree, or have an opinion on abortion if they’re not a woman. It’s a ridiculous notion on its face, and just another way to justify stifling dialogue.

 

[Djfan]

I laugh at this idea that a person can’t be critical of a military leader if they didn’t serve, or can’t talk about a subject if they don’t have a college degree, or have an opinion on abortion if they’re not a woman. It’s a ridiculous notion on its face, and just another way to justify stifling dialogue.

Yes. If you don't have strong logic and facts to win a debate, you must find a way to redefine who is allowed to have valid voices in the conversation. This is the only way to disallow logic and facts - own the narrative.

The liberal way.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

I laugh at this idea that a person can’t be critical of a military leader if they didn’t serve, or can’t talk about a subject if they don’t have a college degree, or have an opinion on abortion if they’re not a woman. It’s a ridiculous notion on its face, and just another way to justify stifling dialogue.

And what's rich is the person demanding credentials of others, while sharing his opinion, never reveals anything about his own qualifications, or lack thereof.

 

[Djfan]