• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

Troglodyte said:
You don’t get it…

Click to expand...

you really don't understand a single goddamned thing you repost, do you?


Is Mississippi Safe?​

The A+ grade indicates that the rate of crime is much lower than that of the average US state. Mississippi ranks in the 96th percentile for safety, meaning it is safer than 96% of states but less safe than 4%. This analysis applies only to Mississippi's official city boundaries. See the table below for nearby states.

The crime rate in Mississippi is 18.31 per 1,000 residents in the typical year. Mississippi Residents generally consider the south part of the state to be the safest. Your chance of being a victim of crime in Mississippi varies by city – ranging from 1 in 40 in the northwest cities to 1 in 67 in the south.

When looking at total crime counts (rather than per capita rates), the west parts of Mississippi see the most incidents – about 14,370 per year. In contrast, the central part of the state has the fewest, with approximately 3,400 crimes annually.


1756215831992.png
Click to expand...

someone on social media posts a meme that your bias agrees with and instead of seeing if that is correct, you rush over here to post the meme like the sub one-dight IQ genital wart you are.
 
Troglodyte said:
😂 **** sandwich time! Begin your mental gymnastics. You see, I don’t blindly accept what Trump says as fact, I’m not in your cult…

Click to expand...

Oh Good Lord. You realize this article proves no point, right???

1. What Trump said was true. The city did go 12 days without a homicide. He didn't lie. You fail.
2. The fact that there have been murder-free periods previously DOES NOT MEAN taking over the police force and bringing in Federal troops is not helping. It demonstrably is.

You posting **** like this is like screaming at the end of the 1st quarter of a football game "We got this, we're gonna win!!"

Keep rooting against making DC safe and saving lives. You and Democrats are on the wrong size of an obvious argument, defending crime.

You remain reprehensible.
 
These are the people @Troglodyte and radical liberals worship. Keep being on the wrong side of the argument, we thank you. Even Joe Scarborough and PMSNBC are attacking Dems.

‘Yes or No!?’ Chicago’s Dem Mayor Refuses FIVE Times to Answer Scarborough on Whether He’d Accept More Cop Funding​


Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough was made to press Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson for an answer after the Democrat repeatedly refused to say if he’d accept more police resourcing from the Trump administration, moments after he demanded President Donald Trump restore $800 million in grants for violence prevention programs

Johnson appeared on MSNBC on Tuesday to continue to push back against Trump’s suggestion on Friday that he may send National Guard troops to Chicago and New York City, as he has in Washington, D.C., as part of a crackdown on crime

The mayor blasted Trump from the outset for threatening his city with a “military occupation” that he said was both “illegal” and “unconstitutional.” He added that it was unnecessary, citing “a precipitous decline in violent crime in every single category” under his leadership.

Listing statistics, he continued: “If this president was actually serious about driving violence down in the city of Chicago and American cities across this country, he would work with mayors to make sure that we have the necessary investments to continue to do the work that we have been doing.”

Scarborough, who has advocated for cooperation between cities and the federal government on crime, asked what a “productive relationship with the Trump administration looks like?”

“An excellent question,” Johnson said. “First of all, he could start by restoring the over $800 million that was taken away from violence prevention efforts back in April.” He continued to detail work with community-led conflict resolution organizations and trained mental health professionals that, in some cases, have circumvented the need for a police officer to turn up at “that scene.”

Scarborough agreed that these were “great programs” before asking whether the mayor would also accept federal funding that would put extra police officers on the street in a line of questioning that quickly escalated into a heated back-and-forth.


SCARBOROUGH: So let me ask you, Mr. Mayor, those all sound like great programs. I’m curious, would you also like to get federal funding to help put 5000 more cops on the street in Chicago? Would that help drive down crime?

JOHNSON: Well, look, policing by itself is not the full strategy.

SCARBOROUGH [INTERRUPTING]: No, I understand that. You’ve talked about the other things you want. And I said those are good and important programs. But I’m asking also, would 5000 more police officers on the street in Chicago be helpful to go along with all of those social programs that a lot of cities are engaging in and having success with?

JOHNSON: Well, look, here’s the best way I can put it, Joe, is that in the 90s, when I was in high school, we had 3000 more police officers, and we had 900 people being murdered every single year in Chicago. It’s just not policing alone. Of course we want more detectives.

SCARBOROUGH: Of course I know policing alone, but, of course it’s not policing alone. You’ve told me everything else you want. I’m curious, and this does come down to an ideological difference between people: do you believe that the streets of Chicago would be safer if there were more uniformed police officers on the streets of Chicago?

JOHNSON: I believe the city of Chicago and cities across America would be safer if we actually had, you know, affordable housing. Look, I’m not saying –

SCARBOROUGH: That not the question I asked. My question is, and I just need a yes or no. Do you believe the streets of Chicago would be safer if you got all of those other extraordinary programs put back into place, which do have a history of being successful, if that’s complimented by having 5000 more cops on the streets of Chicago.

JOHNSON: I don’t believe that we should narrow it down to just police officers is what I’m saying –

SCARBOROUGH: I’m not –

JOHNSON [CONT’D]: – that is an antiquated approach. I’m saying we’ve invested in detectives.

SCARBOROUGH: Are you hearing what I’m saying? I’m agreeing with you that all of these other social programs are extraordinarily important. I just need a yes or a no. And then this will be the last time I ask if you get all of those other social programs that $800 million that New York City does, Los Angeles, other people do with great success? Would an additional 5000 cops on the streets in Chicago help compliment those programs to make Chicago safer?

JOHNSON: Look, we are working hard to make sure that our police department is fully supported. I don’t believe that just simply putting out an arbitrary number around police officers is the answer. What I’m saying is policing and affordable housing. It’s policing and mental and behavioral health care services. It’s policing and youth employment. It’s a full package. Of course, we want to make sure that our police department is fully supported.
Click to expand...

Watch above via MSNBC.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Oh Good Lord. You realize this article proves no point, right???

1. What Trump said was true. The city did go 12 days without a homicide. He didn't lie. You fail.
2. The fact that there have been murder-free periods previously DOES NOT MEAN taking over the police force and bringing in Federal troops is not helping. It demonstrably is.

You posting **** like this is like screaming at the end of the 1st quarter of a football game "We got this, we're gonna win!!"

Keep rooting against making DC safe and saving lives. You and Democrats are on the wrong size of an obvious argument, defending crime.

You remain reprehensible.
Click to expand...
Don't push too hard. Vermin will go out and kill an innocent person to prove their point. Physically that is, not with drugs on a widespread distributed/mandated level which is so much more profitable. And much easier to get away with.

Coming up on 5 years since I lost my Stepdad to their genocide. I'll never forget.
 
Last edited:
"White dudes for Harris"

a man in a suit and tie is laughing while sitting at a table .
 
Do you … no, you don’t. You simply do not read what you post. From this very post:
Troglodyte said:
Point stands.

Click to expand...
If you had read it, you’d have come across this little gem..

In a city where 83% of residents are Black and 90% of its voters are Democrats
Click to expand...

So what is your point again, smooth brain? That there’s violence in a Democratically controlled city where the residents are at or below poverty level? I Well, glory be and sakes alive. Ain’t that something. Retard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top