The Epstein Problem

[Troglodyte]

I understand perfectly. What don't you understand about the term "leak"? From the dictionary:

2. an intentional disclosure of something secret or private.
"one of the employees was responsible for the leak"

or "Former FBI Director James Comey leaked classified information to a reporter."

And again, it's all unsealed now, by law. If they know there's incriminating Trump info in there, why aren't they telling anyone?

So the Biden administration had full knowledge of everything that was in the millions of files and could have, and would have, leaked details? This is just dumb. Obviously the Trump administration didn’t know or they wouldn’t have campaigned for their release before doing an about face.

 

[Troglodyte]

There were thousands that were not sealed.
What don’t you understand about the fact that Biden could have released all the files by executive order as easily as Trump did?

You’re utterly ******* clueless. It wasn’t an executive order, retard.

As rabid as you people were in trying to be rid of Trump, you would think releasing the files would be a sure way to go about it.
What do you think was keeping them from doing so? Something to hide?

Uh, Trump is the one who told republicans that supporting the release of the files would be viewed as hostile.

 

[Troglodyte]

No asswipe, ALL names are being redacted. ALL. VICTIMS and abusers.

Nonsense. Musk’s name wasn’t redacted in the email inquiring about the next wild party.

I provided you the Google search of why the victims are naming names, address that.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

 

[Booted]

Only the people I hate are in the Epstein files.

 

[Sarge]

Only the people I hate are in the Epstein files.

Pretty much. This whole thing is such a tired charade.

 

[Troglodyte]

Tibs,

My participation here has waned. The reason being that politics of this world are a garbage dump. Trump is arrogant and petty, but does some pretty impressive things. The dem leadership is over reactive and mis-focused, and not trustworthy. (There are more offenses on both sides, but I want to be brief here).

So, the question is "Can this all be discussed rationally?"

In a rational world, we could all agree that Trump needs to grow up and not be a middle school puke on social media, or in interviews.

In a rational world we.can agree that there is a lot of theft of public money, inconsistent application of justice and reporting, that swift justice for leadership crimes and wrongs must be dealt with harshly, that protection of the citizenry is a huge priority, that going into debt to leverage votes or kickbacks, or . . . . Is needing punishment, and this list goes on.

The sad part is that this rational world does not exist on this side of the grave. So, we are left with petty, ego driven, partial truths and suspicions, driven by loyalty to a political party, at the cost of reason, conversation, respect, integrity, etc.

So, there you have it. We can all continue down this road, or put on the brakes, and call others to rational conversation. You choose. I have chosen.

I'm glad you're still showing up here. Perhaps we can have more civil conversation again.

Djfan

No.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

Pretty much. This whole thing is such a tired charade.

 

[IndySteel]

 

[Tibs]

I mean... I guess not?

 

[IndySteel]