• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Epstein Problem

 
Troglodyte said:
Why is Trump saying the Epstein files are a hoax? Awfully defensive wouldn’t you say?


Click to expand...
why didn't Biden act on this?
why didn't Kamala bring this up?
why didn't Merrick Garland act on this?
why didn't Lisa Monaco?
why didn't Ben Mizer or Vanita Gupta?

why didn't they? this was in their lap for four years.

are you suggesting there was not a file for four years, then supermagicallyexpadociouslly this file appears in the DOJ?

most everyone doesnt give a damn who is in there, or gets this out in the public eye, but it seems only one side is trying to pin this on OrangeManBad. That side is typically marked by pussyhats, smells of cat piss and lack of personal accountability.
 
ZonaBurgh said:
Yep, not sure why this is even up for discussion.
Click to expand...
because dipshits like Flog and Fibs are trying to pin this on Trump. and if he's NOT in the files, they'll say it was all smoke and mirrors, a sideshow and dismiss it.
 
Whether or not Trump is innocent or guilty sending his previous trial lawyer to interview Maxwell is a bad look. The DOJ should have had someone from each side be witnesses at least. Now both sides still have ammo. I read this was the first time Maxwell had spoke to federal prosecutors which makes 0 sense. Plenty of people before Trump had the chance to do the right thing and did not. Now the ball is in trumps corner so we will see what happens
 
Superman said:
why didn't Biden act on this?
why didn't Kamala bring this up?
why didn't Merrick Garland act on this?
why didn't Lisa Monaco?
why didn't Ben Mizer or Vanita Gupta?

why didn't they? this was in their lap for four years.

are you suggesting there was not a file for four years, then supermagicallyexpadociouslly this file appears in the DOJ?

most everyone doesnt give a damn who is in there, or gets this out in the public eye, but it seems only one side is trying to pin this on OrangeManBad. That side is typically marked by pussyhats, smells of cat piss and lack of personal accountability.
Click to expand...
WTF are you talking about? Did you miss the campaign? Democrats weren’t the ones threatening to unseal and weaponize the Epstein files. WHO WAS? That’s right, TRUMP. And he is certainly acting like he gives a damn who’s in there.
 
Troglodyte said:
WTF are you talking about? Did you miss the campaign? Democrats weren’t the ones threatening to unseal and weaponize the Epstein files. WHO WAS? That’s right, TRUMP. And he is certainly acting like he gives a damn who’s in there.
Click to expand...
OOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I see.

so justice is not to be served unless and/or until the directive comes from the top down.

thanks for that. and by that, I mean lowering, again, the collective IQ of the board while simultaneously wasting the precious bandwidth Al Gore's solar panels generated.

#retard
 
Others have mentioned this multiple times. But if the dems who were in power saw anyway of taking Trump down they would have done so. Most especially with epstien involvement.
They would have cannibalize their own to do so. I mean the guy is a threat to democracy, Hitler and everything else wrapped into 1 person.
So why didn't they?
 
Troglodyte said:
Idiot, political parties don’t possess the files, the DOJ does. Your fellow idiot Trump decided to weaponize the files, promising if he was elected, he would use them to incriminate Democrats. **** changed when HIS DOJ informed him of what the files exposed.

You voted for a pedophile.
Click to expand...

you'll need to cite proof that Trump said this. Specifically the part in red. No, not "named individuals" - but just as you said "Democrats".
 
Troglodyte said:
What did I miss?
Click to expand...
Evidence No. 89564-C that Flog hasn't the mental intellect of a pfucking brick to read the links ze posts prior to determining what they're about.
 

The Inside Scoop on Jeffrey Epstein​

I was his lawyer. I know things that court orders won’t allow me to disclose.​

By
Alan Dershowitz. <----DEMOCRAT

I was Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer. I know the facts, some of which I can’t disclose because it is privileged or subject to court-imposed sealing orders. But what I can disclose makes several important things clear:

Epstein never created a “client list.” The FBI interviewed alleged victims who named several “clients.” These names have been redacted. They should be disclosed but the courts have ordered them sealed. I know who they are. They don’t include any current officeholders. We don’t know whether the accusations are true. The courts have also sealed negative information about some of the accusers to protect them. Neither the Justice Department nor private defense lawyers are free to disregard court sealing orders. The media can and should petition the courts for the release of all names and information so the public can draw its own conclusions.

There has also been speculation about incriminating videos taken by hidden cameras in Epstein’s guest bedrooms. There are videotapes, but they are of public areas of his Palm Beach, Fla., home. Epstein reported the theft of money and a licensed firearm from a drawer in his living room, so the police installed a video camera. I am not aware of video cameras in guest bedrooms.

Open records show an acquaintance between Epstein and Mr. Trump many years ago. That relationship ended when Mr. Trump reportedly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, long before becoming president. I have seen nothing that would suggest anything improper or even questionable by Mr. Trump.
It is clear from the evidence that Epstein committed suicide. What isn’t clear is whether he was assisted by jail personnel. That seems likely to me, based on the evidence of allegedly broken cameras, transfer of his cellmate and the absence of guards during relevant time periods.

I have absolutely no doubt that Epstein never worked for any intelligence agency. If he had, he would surely have told me and his other lawyers, who would have used that information to get him a better deal. (He wasn’t satisfied with the so-called sweetheart deal he got, which required him to spend 1½ years in a local jail and register as a sex offender.) My sources in Israel have confirmed to me that he had no connection to Israeli intelligence. That false story—recently peddled by Tucker Carlson—probably emanated from credible allegations that Robert Maxwell (1923-91), father of Epstein’s former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, worked with the Mossad.

Conspiracy stories attract readers, viewers and listeners. They are also fodder for political attacks. The Epstein case has generated more than its share of such theories, and there is nothing more annoying to gossip mongers than when stubborn facts (or the absence of facts) get in the way of a juicy theory. Sorry to disappoint you, but there is really nothing much to see here, beyond what has already been disclosed.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
If they had had anything, they wouldn't have had to have POTUS create a false narrative about Russia to malign him. They would have just released the negative intel they had.
Click to expand...
This is where I keep landing, Dems had control of this info for 4 years. If they have stuff on him why haven’t they used it?

But Trump’s sudden backtrack makes no sense either. It’s perplexing.

I mean we don’t need files, we don’t need contact lists, we don’t need grand jury testimony, we don’t need video or victim names or details. Just tell us who raped the kids. Should not be complicated.
 
Troglodyte said:
They quote Trump. Are you denying Trump said that? BTW Trump now effectively controls Paramount and CBS. Although I’m sure that doesn’t get coverage from your sources either.
Click to expand...
Just playing the same game you Liberals do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top